Can Jesus Inspire Science?

[epix]

So we can take it that your equation or multiple identity is total bollocks? We know that you can't compute anything.

That IS NOT my "equation or multiple identity," coz I'm not the author of the article in Wikipedia. And why is it so that I'm not the author?

Well?

Come on. It's easy . . .

How about "We know that you can't compute anything."

I guess God is not the only omniscient deity around here.

 

[Mudcat]

I asked you to look INSIDE GoD, or to look between "Go" and "D". To make sure that you don't fail again to follow a simple instruction, post what you see between Go and D.

Simple instructions my ascii controller. You haven't explained anything for those of us who have no idea what you are going on about. How am I suppose to look into something when I haven't the first idea what it is I am looking at in the first place? Break it down into it's simplest possible components and start from there if you'd be so kind.

 

[SezMe]

I asked you to look INSIDE GoD, or to look between "Go" and "D". To make sure that you don't fail again to follow a simple instruction, post what you see between Go and D.

I did (#53) and you did not respond.

 

[dafydd]

That IS NOT my "equation or multiple identity," coz I'm not the author of the article in Wikipedia. And why is it so that I'm not the author?

Well?

Come on. It's easy . . .

How about "We know that you can't compute anything."

I guess God is not the only omniscient deity around here.

It didn't come from Wikipedia. You said it was high school math, prove that you know something about the subject or shut up about it and move on to your next fail.

 

[dafydd]

I did (#53) and you did not respond.

How can he respond? The ''equation'' is bollocks.

 

[epix]

Only one problem there. You cannot look into an imaginary being.

You cannot look, coz of your religion-induced dogma, but others can. Others could look into an imaginary scenario and saw particles like Higgs boson. They learned some of its imaginary properties so they could recognize its presence under real but hypothetical conditions.
http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/higgs-boson-betting.jpg

The history of evolution is full of imaginary creatures for whom there is no fosilized record at all.

And most importantly

One over the Bond Number, ie. 1 / Bo is sometimes referred to as the Jesus number, Je, since bodies can walk on water if they have a large Jesus number, that is if Je > > 1.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_number
you can "expand" the knowledge of mathematics and imagine a number that REALLY doesn't exist. LOL.

 

[epix]

Simple instructions my ascii controller. You haven't explained anything for those of us who have no idea what you are going on about. How am I suppose to look into something when I haven't the first idea what it is I am looking at in the first place? Break it down into it's simplest possible components and start from there if you'd be so kind.

Okay.

A B C

Can you answer what appears between A and C?

Think it over before you shoot.

 

[epix]

I did (#53) and you did not respond.

What was there to respond to?

It looks to me that what's "inside" your GoD is:

² = 2

which makes no sense .... which makes perfect sense.

If the question whether ² = 2 is a true or false statement doesn't make sense to you, then the same question regarding o = O wouldn't make sense to you either.

 

[Mudcat]

Okay.

A B C

Can you answer what appears between A and C?

B

Think it over before you shoot.

This is what you asking me to look at:

Bo = Eo = 2Go² = 2De²

But since you are such an epix fail you seem to be confused about what you are looking at, so let me translate for you:

B times o equals E times o equals 2 times G times o to the 2nd power equals 2 times D times e to the 2nd power

BoEoGoDe in that equation are all variables but beyond that I do not know what it goes to. In other words, epix fail, you making a fuss over nothing.

 

[dafydd]

You cannot look, coz of your religion-induced dogma,

I am an atheist, I have no dogma induced by religion. I have never seen any proof of the existence of any god or gods. It's all quite simple but apparently not simple enough for you to understand.

 

[dafydd]

What was there to respond to?



If the question whether ² = 2 is a true or false statement doesn't make sense to you, then the same question regarding o = O wouldn't make sense to you either.

What do o and O represent?

 

[dafydd]

The history of evolution is full of imaginary creatures for whom there is no fosilized record at all.

.

Wrong. It is the bible that is imaginary.

 

[epix]

B

This is what you asking me to look at:
But since you are such an epix fail you seem to be confused about what you are looking at, so let me translate for you:

BoEoGoDe in that equation are all variables but beyond that I do not know what it goes to. In other words, epix fail, you making a fuss over nothing.

What are you babbling about? Others, like SezMe, didn't have a bit of problem to follow a simple instruction.

It looks to me that what's "inside" your GoD is:

² = 2

which makes no sense .... which makes perfect sense.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7867421&postcount=53

When faced with something else than what the Holy Father in Oxford teaches, even a simple arrangement poses a problem to you. I haven't seen such a dramatic failure of reason, like in your case. You scare me - more than the literal creationists.

 

[epix]

So you were serious about your little highlighted letters in that formula. Amazing.

Since, out of necessity, you've restricted your world view to the single notion that "religion sucks" and can't expand beyond that, lots of things you may come across would appear amazing to you.

 

[dafydd]

What are you babbling about? Others, like SezMe, didn't have a bit of problem to follow a simple instruction.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7867421&postcount=53

When faced with something else than what the Holy Father in Oxford teaches, even a simple arrangement poses a problem to you. I haven't seen such a dramatic failure of reason, like in your case. You scare me - more than the literal creationists.

You would know all about failures of reason, you do nothing else but fail.

 

[slingblade]

the Holy Father in Oxford

Who?

Last I looked, the Pope was nowhere near Oxford.

 

[epix]

Who?

Last I looked, the Pope was nowhere near Oxford.

You don't know where His Serene Knowledge lives? In Oxford, Oxford, Oxford.

A mystery buyer has acquired the Internet address Vatican.xxx, which combines the Holy See with an extension specifically used for pornographic material.

http://global.christianpost.com/news/unknown-buyer-obtains-vatican-xxx-web-domain-65490/
Now you know how to surf the net for more info on perverted, soaked-with-evil Christianity. I guess His Serene Knowledge mortgaged his house to build himself a tall cyber-minaret to blow his scientific trumpet from. Lols.
Keep on hacking . . .

 

[Andrew Wiggin]

I dunno if anybody has mentioned it yet (I havent read all of the thread), but in Australia the hand rail/bar in the car above the window is commonly referred to as a "Jesus bar".

Mainly because when you grab hold of it, you're usually screaming "JESSSSUUUSSSS!!!!!!!"

I've generally heard versions using the vulgar term for excrement.

 

[Andrew Wiggin]

You don't know where His Serene Knowledge lives? In Oxford, Oxford, Oxford.

[email protected]?

 

[slingblade]

You don't know where His Serene Knowledge lives? In Oxford

Who?