Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Bell said:
Thanks for pointing me to those posts.

On one side there are pieces of AA77 and body parts and DNA of its passengers and crew found inside the Pentagon.

On the other hand we have witnesses claiming AA77 flew along a path that could not have led to it crashing into the Pentagon.

Which of these should we accept as hard evidence?
Click to expand...


This is a legitimate question, but doesn't change the body of evidence CIT obtained one bit. If you've read the thread, you witnessed mutliple lies by your fellow debunkers. None of them agreed with Caustic Logic (who by the way never came back to defend his writings, just lately with the testimony of Albert Hemphill proven to be terribly wrong again) that the CIT witnesses are conspiring in a cover-up.

Why? Why not acknowledge the evidence, if so obviously made up? I'll leave you with this question.
 
funk de fino said:
From that thread.



That was proven. They mislead at best and lied at worst eh?

A flyover is up there with DEW and no planes. Complete stupidity.
Click to expand...


You never commented on #165, funk, i noticed. You never apologized to twinstead (and you should, even if he doesn't get it) for misleading him. You have no credibility.
 
I can't for the life of me understand why these people don't understand what the word corroboration means. They keep attacking the least important evidence in the investigation, eyewitness testimony, which can be highly unreliable in the first place, and ignore the big elephant in the room--the physical evidence. DNA, plane parts, radar, etc. Unless you can corroborate eyewitness testimony with the physical evidence, it doesn't mean squat. People make mistakes, DNA doesn't. If you just went by the testimony of a crime, then you would have 200 people having killed Jon-Benet Ramsey.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Maybe you're interested in reading the first six pages of this thread where i tried to nail the jelly to the wall. The amount of lies and evasions by the shills and useful idiots is quite astonishing. The rest of the thread, after the very informed mudlark showed up and unintentionally ruined my evil plans, is also quite interesting.
Click to expand...
CIT makes up delusions, you believe them. You have made your case, you are right, you believe idiots who make up lies. CIT witnesses point south; why is 911 truth directionally challenged?

With the FDR there is no doubt where 77's flight path was, and with CIT witnesses pointing to the real flight path defined by the FDR and multiple RADAR sites, it is insanity to support CIT's moronic conclusion of a flyover.

roscoe_the_first said:
May I introduce you all to something called:

EYEWITNESSESS ...
Click to expand...
All the eyewitnesses say 77 impacted the Pentagon. They all agree with 77 impacting the Pentagon. Good job reminding the world terrorists murdered Passengers on Flight 77 by impacting the Pentagon. You are such a great human; thanks
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
This is a legitimate question, but doesn't change the body of evidence CIT obtained one bit. .
Click to expand...

Your "evidence" consists of a handful of of people that say they saw something. We have the statements of hundreds of people that report seeing something else, things that are explained only by a 757 crashing into the Pentagon.

When faced with conflicting witnesses, look to the physical and forensic evidence to see which eyewitness are mistaken.

Lets do that.

How do you explain the fact that the entire 757 and the body remains of everyone that boarded the plane at Dulles airport was found inside the Pentagon as soon as the fires cooled enough for investigators to get inside?

We have hundreds of eyewitnesses to the above and thousands of investigators that examined the evidence in detail afterwords.
 
There is no sense in presenting any evidence that is not available to the general public either via the internet, or at a local museum, as they will simply use the truther default/escape clause, which states that unless they can put their hands on it, and have it independently verified by DRG, the evidence is faked, planted, and/or does not exist at all, except on paper.

Forget it...if these guys can't physically go in, touch the DNA, and then have Steven Jones (why not, he tries all other sorts of sciences he is unqualified in) verify it, they will say it is fake/fabricated.

TAM:)
 
Childlike Empress said:
Bell: I guess i shouldn't reply to this post, but as you took a break and maybe aren't familiar with the evidence, i also refer you to the thread linked in #132, especially post #139 (if you want me to reply to further posts of yours on this topic) and #165 (if you want to see the company you're in here).
Click to expand...
I have revisited the thread to which you refer. What I find most remarkable is that it is you who is pointing folks to it.
 
Welp, the eyewitnesses in the video prove that the government lied about the flight path, also it proves we need a new investigation... now what?
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
beachnut, your lies are documented quite well in #165 and several posts by mudlark troughout the linked thread. I cashed in at least three yellow cards for calling you what you are, that's more than enough.
Click to expand...
CIT are liars and you can't prove 77 flew over the Pentagon. The FDR destroys your failed support for the insane fly over nut cases known as CIT. They make up idiot lies and you support them without any evidence.

RADAR data alone proves CIT are liars and failures at analyzing what happen on 911. CIT are liars and your no evidence support reinforces their failure. Why can't the OP author find the RADAR data to correct his delusions on 911? Why can't you? Why do you support liars so poorly?

It is funny, all the witnesses you point out show 77 impacting the Pentagon. lol, you are not doing very good at supporting CIT, you are debunking them. http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/6783/location.jpg

You debunk yourself and Paik points to the south flight path; what is new? FDR and RADAR supports my position, made up lies and moronic fantasy supports your position. How do CIT remain clueless for over 8 years?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Now what? That's your own decision. I spend time with people i detest on the internet. If i were a US citizen, i would do more.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, the heros of CIT haven't put up their "report" section on their website: http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/report.html

It's been "under construction" for a year now. How can a soldier of "operation accountability" (LOL!) report his success stories?

I hope it's just a matter of time before we see

"OPERATION ACCOUNTABILITY: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"
 
Childlike Empress said:
Needless to say, you didn't watch the video evidence of the testimonies presented. Because my posts are by any standards less remarkable.
Click to expand...
There was no need for me to revisit the videos, I suffered through them when first I read the thread. I was, instead, searching for the victory over the NWO shills and debunkers that you implied was yours. I suspect that your idea of victory is different from mine. Probably a translation thing...
 
Childlike Empress said:
Better think about what YOU do about it. EOT.
Click to expand...
I know what I would do if I truly believed I had evidence that the government lied about and/or had a hand in the 9/11 attacks. I would take said evidence to any one in the government that I thought I could remotely trust. I would also do the same with anyone I thought I could trust in the mainstream media. Not to mention the media and governments of other countries. After that I would stand outside of the White House, Ground Zero, senators' offices every day demanding they respond to the evidence.

What would you do?
 
Redtail said:
I know what I would do if I truly believed I had evidence that the government lied about and/or had a hand in the 9/11 attacks. I would take said evidence to any one in the government that I thought I could remotely trust. I would also do the same with anyone I thought I could trust in the mainstream media. Not to mention the media and governments of other countries. After that I would stand outside of the White House, Ground Zero, senators' offices every day demanding they respond to the evidence.

What would you do?
Click to expand...

I have no dog in this fight, and I'm not trying to disparage what Redtail's saying, because he (or she) is totally correct.

That being said, when people do the things listed above they get called "loons" or worse.

Not saying they're right or wrong, but that is what happens, isn't it? What's a person to do, really?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom