Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Firstly show me the letter. Anyone could have written this or altered it.

Secondly even if he did write this he couldn't have seen the plane fly into the pentagon from where he was standing. He, like you, assumed the plane flew into the pentagon.

Once again. Nobody but nobody saw any plane fly into the pentagon, they assumed it did because that is the easiest explanation for them to swallow.

Anyone could have altered it? Oh dear... you better ask your fellow truthers about that:

http://www.911-strike.com/lagasse.htm

"There was no steep bank, but a shallow bank with a
heavy uncoordinated left rudder turn causing a severe yaw into the building
with the starboard side of the cockpit actually hitting at about the same
time the wing was involved with the trailer."

Given that your OP talks about "eyewitnesses," it is curious that you are now accusing your own eyewitnesses of lying.

Great thread!
 
Last edited:
Anyone could have altered it? Oh dear... you better ask your fellow truthers about that:

Please explain to me this phrase:

your fellow truthers?
Given that your OP talks about "eyewitnesses," it is curious that you are now accusing your own eyewitnesses of lying.

Great thread!

yes but you are cherry picking the evidence aren't you?

Lagasse said the plane flew to the north side of the CITCO garage in 2006. did he say this or did he not|?

why is this important? Do you know?

Why does Lagasse say the letter you posted in 2003 and then insist that the plane was to the north of the CITCO garage in 2006
 
Last edited:
yes but you are cherry picking the evidence aren't you?

Lagasse said the plane flew to the north side of the CITCO garage. did he say this or did he not|?

why is this important? Do you know?

I am cherry picking evidence? Wow. You mean quoting the parts where he said the plane hit the Pentagon in response to your question whether he saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

Uh, Lagasse said "it was not over Arlington
National Cemetery but closer to Columbia pike itself, there is a small grove
of trees that would have shielded anyone on 27 from seeing the aircraft
until it was literally on top of them."

So pulling out a map..... South of CITGO. Thanks babe, again, GREAT THREAD!
 
I am cherry picking evidence? Wow. You mean quoting the parts where he said the plane hit the Pentagon in response to your question whether he saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

Uh, Lagasse said "it was not over Arlington
National Cemetery but closer to Columbia pike itself, there is a small grove
of trees that would have shielded anyone on 27 from seeing the aircraft
until it was literally on top of them."

So pulling out a map..... South of CITGO. Thanks babe, again, GREAT THREAD!

He was in the gas station itself when he saw the plane to the north of the CITCO garage . Nobody said it was over arlington cemetery, the phrase "closer to Columbia Pike" does not mean 'Over Columbia Pike'. Nice try, no banana. Everyone said it was over the navy annex. Completely inconsistent with the Black box data and light pole damage.

Shall I mention the speed at this point or can you only deal with one thing at a time?
 
Last edited:
The scary thing is that the CIT/No Planers are rapidly becoming the majority viewpoint of the 911 Truth Movement.

Yes well since Bush left office, and the distance from the event has increased, all that seem to be left are the crazies.

I mean look at the delusions espoused by some of them in the thread alone...

1. They have all the evidence.
2. People believing the official account are in the minority.
3. Science is on THEIR side.

This trend toward the "Fanatic" truther is going to continue as time goes on. Think of how crazy the flat earthers and moon hoaxers are.

TAM:)
 
Is this the illegitimate red-headed step-child baby of Craig and Aldo stopping in for a drive-by? I told them they should have practiced safe moonbattery! Now they have this thing they have to live with.

I think they got irritated by the "Whats going on with Captain Bob and his stooges" thread. The bait was set, and along comes roscoe. Coincidence, or a successful hunt for a new ball of wool...I'll let you decide.

pS: and at the rate he is getting yellow cards, I doubt he will survive the weekend here.

TAM:)
 
The plane disappeared behind trees from the policeman's point of view.

and Sean Boger hit the deck. Neither saw a plane hit the pentagon.

Many people saw the plane hit the Pentagon including Sean Boger. He watched it happen. The C130 pilot also saw it disappear at the Pentagon. The ATC guys watched it drop off screens at the Pentagon area.
 
Yes well since Bush left office, and the distance from the event has increased, all that seem to be left are the crazies.

I mean look at the delusions espoused by some of them in the thread alone...

1. They have all the evidence.
2. People believing the official account are in the minority.
3. Science is on THEIR side.

This trend toward the "Fanatic" truther is going to continue as time goes on. Think of how crazy the flat earthers and moon hoaxers are.

TAM:)

You know calling me a truther is straight out of Orwell's 1984. Truth is now a lie.
 
He was in the gas station itself when he saw the plane to the north of the CITCO garage . Nobody said it was over arlington cemetery. Everyone said it was over the navy annex. Completely inconsistent with the Black box data and light pole damage.

Shall I mention the speed at this point or can you only deal with one thing at a time?

Hmmm, you got your map out already? Wow, that was fast. (rolls eyes)

So Lagasse lied about seeing the plane hitting the Pentagon, and Boger lied about the plane hitting the Pentagon (I believe that you said something about ducking right? yeah, he never said that, but, hey, you are a truther) And I guess Morin lied about it hitting the Pentagon.

Funny, although you say that Lagasse could not see the plane hit the Pentagon, you never mention that he would have seen the fantasy pull up and over, right?

Anyway, roscoe was talking about "eyewitnesses" folks. Roscoe thinks his eyewitnesses were lying.

Great Thread, truther.
 
You know calling me a truther is straight out of Orwell's 1984. Truth is now a lie.

What about sock? Do you like sock better? Does it better describe you?

come on, the way you post, the words you use, the way in which you post them, and the content...I mean apart from Aldo, Craig, and Bob, there are no other people who believe CIT crap any more, so you must be one of those three, correct?

TAM:)
 
You know this dude is running back to his favorite CT website where he is bragging how he Pwned the Sheeple at JREF. :rolleyes:

Any chance this is Aldo's daughter?
 
Why even engage this child?

I like to hope that, when asked to affirm an actual theory or make an actual claim, perhaps someone might see how wrong they are. The fact that it hasn't happened yet makes me naive, I suppose. :)

ETA - I could be wrong, but a fair bunch of these guys claim to be British for some reason. I wonder why that is?
 

Back
Top Bottom