Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

carlitos said:
I like to hope that, when asked to affirm an actual theory or make an actual claim, perhaps someone might see how wrong they are. The fact that it hasn't happened yet makes me naive, I suppose. :)

ETA - I could be wrong, but a fair bunch of these guys claim to be British for some reason. I wonder why that is?
Click to expand...
P'sh - because they know if the government knew they were Americans, they'd have a one-way ticket to a FEMA camp.
 
Papermache said:
P'sh - because they know if the government knew they were Americans, they'd have a one-way ticket to a FEMA camp.
Click to expand...

Hah! Like Britain would not extradite a truther to the US. Britain eats out of the US' hand as it is ;) :p
 
 
bio said:
wow - thank you for these posts.

the eyewitnesses speak a clear language: They are 100 % debunking the official version.
Click to expand...

wow - thank you for these posts.

the eyewitnesses speak a clear language: They are 100 % stating that the plane hit the Pentagon.
 
16.5 said:
wow - thank you for these posts.

the eyewitnesses speak a clear language: They are 100 % stating that the plane hit the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

nobody saw the hit actually, but this is for me not the most interesting point:

They debunk the official flight path clearly. Follow up question is then: What had kicked down the light poles?
 
bio said:
nobody saw the hit actually, but this is for me not the most interesting point:

They debunk the official flight path clearly. Follow up question is then: What had kicked down the light poles?
Click to expand...

Uh, yes actually they did. I quoted them above in this very thread. Lagasse said what knocked over the light poles. I am simply going to have to insist that you read the entire thread, Bio.

Have you seen CIT's raw video that they promised to release? they were going to torrent it, but all we have so far is this cleverly edited garbage with misleading voiceovers.

Have you seen the RAW unedited video yet?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
May I introduce you all to something called:

EYEWITNESSESS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcrZNxDrh4s&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=Q--0Leuh9Ag&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=iYVoqmSfcEo&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=G8L6gIzbz7A&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=KSHAs2dEWCg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=bKbT9r-6IPQ&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=yysF6JpN1RU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=Anbuh-SdT3o&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=B42ZpMqKvVs&feature=related
Click to expand...

how could it be, that the plane did not fly as it was planned? The plan was, that it flew more southerly, but it was flying too northerly. Do you have any speculation?

For me it is clear, that the taxi-driver is lying, he indirectly admits it.
 
Last edited:
bio said:
how could it be, that the plane did not fly on its route as it was planned? The plane was, that it flew the south route, but it was flying more northerly. Do you have any speculation?

For me it is clear, that he taxi-driver is lying, he indirectly admits it.
Click to expand...

How do you explain the fact that the entire 757 and the body remains of everyone that boarded the plane at Dulles airport was found inside the Pentagon as soon as the fires cooled enough for investigators to get inside?

We have hundreds of eyewitnesses to the above and thousands of investigators that examined the evidence in detail afterwords.
 
Last edited:
bio said:
For me it is clear, that the taxi-driver is lying, he indirectly admits it.
Click to expand...

Really, then you've seen the raw video then?

And lying about what? Even the Buffet Slayer admits that Lloyde was mistaken, he could not have been on the bridge where he insisted he was. So you think an eighty year old man who was, by the time that hidden video was shot, confused about the events of the day was also "indirectly" admitting to foreknowldge of mass murder?

Really. Well, good for you. hey it is on You Tube, it has got to be true.
 
BigAl said:
How do you explain the fact that the entire 757 and the body remains of everyone that boarded the plane at Dulles airport was found inside the Pentagon as soon as the fires cooled enough for investigators to get inside?
Click to expand...

And the explanation backed up by evidence, off course.
 
bio said:
wow - thank you for these posts.

the eyewitnesses speak a clear language: They are 100 % debunking the official version.
Click to expand...


Maybe you're interested in reading the first six pages of this thread where i tried to nail the jelly to the wall. The amount of lies and evasions by the shills and useful idiots is quite astonishing. The rest of the thread, after the very informed mudlark showed up and unintentionally ruined my evil plans, is also quite interesting.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
May I introduce you all to something called:

EYEWITNESSESS
Click to expand...
Yes, all the witnesses point to the flight path of Flight 77 found in the FDR, which was found in the Pentagon with all the DNA from the passengers on Flight 77.

Your delusions have been debunked by science, and witnesses; even the witnesses you present. You failed due to lack of evidence. You failed due to lack of knowledge. Do you know what a FDR is? Do you know where Flight 77's FDR was found? Do you understand the final track in the FDR matches the damage track in the Pentagon?

You presented videos of eye witnesses pointing to the flight path of 77, the real flight path and you have no clue they are pointing to the south. Next time when you find delusions on the Internet get a map and see how stupid the videos are you posted. Do you fall for paranoid conspiracy theories often?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Maybe you're interested in reading the first six pages of this thread where i tried to nail the jelly to the wall. The amount of lies and evasions by the shills and useful idiots is quite astonishing. The rest of the thread, after the very informed mudlark showed up and unintentionally ruined my evil plans, is also quite interesting.
Click to expand...

Wow the amount of lies in that one post is REALLY astonishing.

Now, perhaps you can do what the incompetent frauds at PFFT and CIT can't do: give us the calculations for that flight path, you know bank angle, G force, etc. Don't worry for the time being about the descent and fantasy pull up and over.

Say, did you ever explain why you think that CIT's right hand man Cap'n Bobby is a snake oil salesman?
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Maybe you're interested in reading the first six pages of this thread where i tried to nail the jelly to the wall. The amount of lies and evasions by the shills and useful idiots is quite astonishing. The rest of the thread, after the very informed mudlark showed up and unintentionally ruined my evil plans, is also quite interesting.
Click to expand...

CIT are liars. They are clueless. You have been suckered by them.
 
Bell: I guess i shouldn't reply to this post, but as you took a break and maybe aren't familiar with the evidence, i also refer you to the thread linked in #132, especially post #139 (if you want me to reply to further posts of yours on this topic) and #165 (if you want to see the company you're in here).
 
Childlike Empress said:
Bell: I guess i shouldn't reply to this post, but as you took a break and maybe aren't familiar with the evidence, i also refer you to the thread linked in #132, especially post #139 (if you want me to reply to further posts of yours on this topic) and #165 (if you want to see the company you're in here).
Click to expand...

How do you explain the fact that the entire 757 and the body remains of everyone that boarded the plane at Dulles airport was found inside the Pentagon as soon as the fires cooled enough for investigators to get inside?

We have hundreds of eyewitnesses to the above and thousands of investigators that examined the evidence in detail afterwords.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Bell: I guess i shouldn't reply to this post, but as you took a break and maybe aren't familiar with the evidence, i also refer you to the thread linked in #132, especially post #139 (if you want me to reply to further posts of yours on this topic) and #165 (if you want to see the company you're in here).
Click to expand...

Thanks for pointing me to those posts.

On one side there are pieces of AA77 and body parts and DNA of its passengers and crew found inside the Pentagon.

On the other hand we have witnesses claiming AA77 flew along a path that could not have led to it crashing into the Pentagon.

Which of these should we accept as hard evidence?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Bell: I guess i shouldn't reply to this post, but as you took a break and maybe aren't familiar with the evidence, i also refer you to the thread linked in #132, especially post #139 (if you want me to reply to further posts of yours on this topic) and #165 (if you want to see the company you're in here).
Click to expand...

From that thread.

funk de fino claims that CIT are deceptive about his testimony and "edited it to try and shoehorn it into their falsehoods".
Click to expand...

That was proven. They mislead at best and lied at worst eh?

A flyover is up there with DEW and no planes. Complete stupidity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom