Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Try looking at the videos.

Don't have a theory old chum, just want a new independant enquiry. Got a problem with that have you?
Click to expand...
I am not going to watch 10 youtubes. I have done a lot of research on the subject, thanks.

As for an independent inquiry - no problem at all. Please have at it, and report the results here.

Just one small thing, since you made a claim ("my government" is lying about a plane) - Could you posit a better explanation for what happened at the Pentagon?

Thanks! :)
 
roscoe_the_first said:
The first didn't get as much funding as the Clinton enquiry and took one and a half years to get underway.
Click to expand...

How about you look at the cost of the investigtion in total, in addition to your cherry picking of the 911 commission cost.

Will you pay? If not who will pay?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Is this the best the best you can do? Wait until I report this back into the real world. The average Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorist on JREF is a half wit as this post of yours proves.
Click to expand...

CIT and No planers are utter scumbags that even the rest of the 911 TM ignore. Ignored by pondlife, how low can one get?
 
They need to convince somebody who CAN pay that a new investigation needs to be done. Why, with evidence this compelling, it should happen any day, right?

Right?
 
carlitos said:
I am not going to watch 10 youtubes. I have done a lot of research on the subject, thanks.
Click to expand...

What you mean is that you don't want to see anything that you don't have the moral fortitude to deal with.

carlitos said:
As for an independent inquiry - no problem at all. Please have at it, and report the results here.
Click to expand...

Thanks we will, since you BCTs are now rapidly becoming a minority.

carlitos said:
Just one small thing, since you made a claim ("my government" is lying about a plane) - Could you posit a better explanation for what happened at the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

Dunno. That's why one has a enquiry doesn't one?

Thanks! :)
 
Last edited:
You can't even explain what you mean when you said:

Not arguing there wasn't a plane Sonny. It just wasn't where your government says it was.
Click to expand...

That's all I'm asking. There were 4 planes. Which one wasn't "where my government said it was" and how do you know?

I don't think asking for clarification on this is too much. You made a vague claim that I can't understand.
 
funk de fino said:
CIT and No planers are utter scumbags that even the rest of the 911 TM ignore. Ignored by pondlife, how low can one get?
Click to expand...

The scary thing is that the CIT/No Planers are rapidly becoming the majority viewpoint of the 911 Truth Movement.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
No it's you who has a condition called Cognitive Dissonance.
Click to expand...

You have no iodea what that means.

Look up the word BELLYFEEL from the book 1984 by George Orwell. This describes your condition.
Click to expand...

CT cliche handbook page 34.


Would I pay for something that may remove a criminal organisation out of my life? Absolutely!
Click to expand...

Are you willing to pay for a new investigation into 911? How much if so?
 
Hi roscoe the first. I know you're posting fast and furious here, but could you please just take a moment and explain where you are coming from here?

carlitos said:
You can't even explain what you mean when you said:

Not arguing there wasn't a plane Sonny. It just wasn't where your government says it was.
Click to expand...

That's all I'm asking. There were 4 planes. Which one wasn't "where my government said it was" and how do you know?

I don't think asking for clarification on this is too much. You made a vague claim that I can't understand.
Click to expand...
 
As I stated, I'm not watching those movies. You can't summarize, in your own words, what the big deal is?
 
carlitos said:
Look, I have been completely civil here. You made a vague claim about "my government" lying about an airplane's location. I politely asked you to clarify. You point me to 10 youtube videos, which I couldn't even watch if I wanted to right now.
Click to expand...

And I answered. Look at the videos and comment on them.

carlitos said:
I can explain my version of all 4 plane impacts in a few short sentences. Why can't you please explain your claim about one of these planes? Heck, cut and paste it from somewhere else if you like.
Click to expand...

You were present at all four plane impacts then? You do get about a bit.

Here let me give you a clue.

The word EYEWITNESSESS is the key
 
Last edited:
Well, I don't see this getting anywhere. If I was pointing to a bunch of movies with eyewitnesses in them, I could at least summarize what the big deal about it was.

Hey Joe - Check out this link to "eyewitnesses." In this video you see ______ claiming _______, which means that totally ____________!

If these movies are so breathtaking in their importance, why is roscoe the first unable to summarize them cogently? What is the point?

ETA - Yes, all the evidence - physical, documentary and eyewitness.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom