"But Global Warming is a HOAX!!!"

[IsThisTheLife]

I very much agree. We have to decarbonise the system in which we live. Be it energy supply, urban design, or supply chain issues etc.

Turkeys voting for Christmas. You really have no idea, do you?

 

[lobosrul5]

Turkeys voting for Christmas. You really have no idea, do you?

We didn't start the fire... we just burned the ******* world to the ground for the next generations.

 

[IsThisTheLife]

We didn't start the fire... we just burned the ******* world to the ground for the next generations.

Do you have any idea what kind of a world we'll be living in without so-called "fossil fuels"?

I'm guessing not.

 

[lobosrul5]

BTW, to reiterate;

in case you ignoramuses haven't noticed, over the last few decades it's been discovered that the solar system is awash in hydrocarbons, in the form of methane - several major bodies having literal oceans of the stuff.

... and?

Thus, you might want to rethink your assumptions about the origins of "fossil fuels" - maybe they aren't "fermented plants, fish and dinosaurs"?

LOL.

Are you telling me dead trees aren't fossil fuels, or that they weren't recently plants?

ETA: what difference does it even make what the source of c02 emitted hydrocarbons is? If you are implying god, or aliens, put them there it doesnt matter.

 

[lobosrul5]

Do you have any idea what kind of a world we'll be living in without so-called "fossil fuels"?

I'm guessing not.

We would've never existed. Getting off* fossil fuels is not the same as saying humanity should've never used them.

*or IMO (but I'm an eval moderate), probably just reducing them by 50 or 75% is enough

 

[catsmate]

BTW, to reiterate;

in case you ignoramuses haven't noticed, over the last few decades it's been discovered that the solar system is awash in hydrocarbons, in the form of methane - several major bodies having literal oceans of the stuff.

Thus, you might want to rethink your assumptions about the origins of "fossil fuels" - maybe they aren't "fermented plants, fish and dinosaurs"?

LOL.

What has this to do with the measurable and deleterious effects on the Earth's ecosphere from adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere?

 

[IsThisTheLife]

Sorry dude, but you're making no sense to me.

 

[IsThisTheLife]

What has this to do with the measurable and deleterious effects on the Earth's ecosphere from adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere?

LoL.

 

[lobosrul5]

Sorry dude, but you're making no sense to me.

Likewise.

 

[IsThisTheLife]

Jaysus, you're all just immune to reason, aren't you?

 

[lomiller]

Do you have any idea what kind of a world we'll be living in without so-called "fossil fuels"?

I'm guessing not.

And you do know?

Thus, you might want to rethink your assumptions about the origins of "fossil fuels" - maybe they aren't "fermented plants, fish and dinosaurs"?

LOL.

Fossil fuels have distinct isotope signatures that show their origin. All the hydrocarbons we use were previously living material.

 

[lobosrul5]

Jaysus, you're all just immune to reason, aren't you?

What reason? The earth is just ~10,000 years old and Jesus put oil and coal in the earth because he loves us and wants us to be warm?

I'm genuinely curious on just wth you mean?

 

[IsThisTheLife]

I suggest that advocates of "anthropogenic global warming" acquaint themselves with the percentage of the atmosphere that is CO2, as a start to having the faintest *********** idea.

 

[Hercules56]

I suggest that advocates of "anthropogenic global warming" acquaint themselves with the percentage of the atmosphere that is CO2, as a start to having the faintest *********** idea.

Evidence shows, from the geologic record, that CO2 ppm moving from say 100 to 500 ppm makes a big difference in our climate.

 

[Pixel42]

It's gone up from 280 ppm (2.8%) to 420 ppm (4.2%) in the last couple of centuries.

 

[Pixel42]

Can't wait to see what the imaginary gotcha is going to be.

 

[lobosrul5]

Can't wait to see what the imaginary gotcha is going to be.

Its only a few hundred parts per million, nothing in that small of quantity can be bad!! (nevermind that arsenic is lethal at 25ppm).

 

[IsThisTheLife]

Evidence shows, from the geologic record, that CO2 ppm moving from say 100 to 500 ppm makes a big difference in our climate.

98%+ of the free CO2 in the biosphere is in solution in the oceans.

As the oceans warm they out-gas CO2.

Atmospheric CO2 follows global warming, a truth established decades ago.

The tale we're being told, the opposite, IS A LIE.

 

[lobosrul5]

98%+ of the free CO2 in the biosphere is in solution in the oceans.

As the oceans warm they out-gas CO2.

Atmospheric CO2 follows global warming, a truth established decades ago.

The tale we're being told, the opposite, IS A LIE.

Co2 within the ocean does not have a greenhouse effect as co2 in the atmosphere does. This is not a clever gotcha.

 

[IsThisTheLife]

Co2 within the ocean does not have a greenhouse effect as co2 in the atmosphere does. This is not a clever gotcha.

No such thing.

ETA >> I suggest you take a deep dive into ice core (CO2) and dendrochronological (temperature) evidence.

Atmospheric CO2 follows global temperature, established decades ago.