Which blows the whole, “god doesn’t reveal himself to us because that would remove freewill” argument right out of the water. So why did people in the past get evidence (miracles, etc), even if they didn’t believe it, while we get nothing?
I really don't understand your quote, but whatever.
I didn’t limit the type of evidence. What about written records, what about eyewitness accounts, what about others reporting some of the miracles – I think dead people getting out of their tombs and walking about would be reported by at least someone else (no I’m not referring to Jesus here but the Saints that left their tombs and wandered about).
It was reported in the scriptures, which like I have said many times before, is the 'only' evidence that exists. I even gave you a link.
Very, seems as if it doesn’t exist and all those stories were made up based on a number of different urban legends and then later edited and combined.
Your opinion.
Never argued that. But Jesus being physical should have left tons of evidence in some fashion if he were indeed physical, regardless of the spiritual side of things.
And what would the evidence prove?
To answer my own question....nothing really, as the physical aspect does 'nothing' for the believers.
OK, if you don’t like that then how about irrational, or delusional, or wishful thinking, or believing in myth or fairy tales? Ahem, I never claimed to be nice. Recall where I pointed out your hypocrisy, which you are even now compounding.
I never asked you to be nice. Just don't call the belief of others moronic.