Cont: Brexit: Now What? Part 6. Pick up sticks...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Erm, the war finished in 1945.

Yes, but a pointless (and incorrect) argument about exactly how long after the war he was born proved and effective distraction from the point that she said that "What did you do in the War?" was a legitimate question to ask a politician who wasn't born at the time.
 
Yes, but a pointless (and incorrect) argument about exactly how long after the war he was born proved and effective distraction from the point that she said that "What did you do in the War?" was a legitimate question to ask a politician who wasn't born at the time.

If your parents were actively part of a genocide expedition - voluntarily or conscripted - it is quite legitimate to point it out.
 
If your parents were actively part of a genocide expedition - voluntarily or conscripted - it is quite legitimate to point it out.

No it isn't, nobody's to blame for what their parents did before they were even born. And in your case your accusation against Jean Claude Juncker's father - that he was an SS officer - wasn't even true.
 
What has any of it got to do with Brexit?


All politicians in charge of state affairs are rightly open to probity.


Michel H's belief that everybody in the EU should be 'altruistic' and hand over a trade deal 'with a smile', needed to be countered.


There are power struggles going on. The Brexiteers perception that it is a case of German dominance might be mistaken, but you can understand where the reservation comes from.

Juncker likely grew up in a household and education environment that resented the Brit, just like Brits of the Baby Boomer generation seeing the Germans as baddies, as depicted in comics and popular culture.

Juncker should come clean and own up to exactly what his dad did in the war. Come clean and we can all get over it.
 
All politicians in charge of state affairs are rightly open to probity.


Michel H's belief that everybody in the EU should be 'altruistic' and hand over a trade deal 'with a smile', needed to be countered.


There are power struggles going on. The Brexiteers perception that it is a case of German dominance might be mistaken, but you can understand where the reservation comes from.

Juncker likely grew up in a household and education environment that resented the Brit, just like Brits of the Baby Boomer generation seeing the Germans as baddies, as depicted in comics and popular culture.

Juncker should come clean and own up to exactly what his dad did in the war. Come clean and we can all get over it.

Oh please. :rolleyes:
 
The Wehrmacht is simply an umbrella term to describe the overall armed forces.

Fact is:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/luxemb...fb_comment_id=789601597762064_789674804421410


Lucky Juncker: his dad got to live to >90 whilst his fellow Jews did not.

OK, so we are all an accident of history. However, the idea that EU leaders today are somehow automatically benign is naive. Juncker has publicly said he resents the British press for mentioning his father's role in WWII.

Let's be realistic, EU members jockey for position just like they have always done.

Michel H assuming it's all now hunky-dory tree-hugging compliance is blinkered.

So what? You claimed he was in the SS. The SS is NOT an umbrella term for the German armed forces. Not all Wehrmacht were Nazis and you have demonstrated no evidence that he was an officer or that his sins were passed on genetically to his son and what this means for Brexit.
 
If people are going to have a go at Rees-Mogg for being 'an upper class twit', then there is clearly an intuitive feeling amongst people that your background (for example, what your parents did) is an important part of understanding what makes a politician tick.

You have noticed Juncker thinks it's OK to patronise females and touch them.

In this respect, he is not much different from Trump.

I am sure he is a very nice chap otherwise.

I am glad Thersa May confronted him, as he has been making fun of her.
There needs to be a term equivalent to godwins law, but for trump.
 
It's just more and more of this every day.

Today I listened to an interview on BBC. They were grilling an official in Turkey about their own issues with suppressed journalists and academics, but the official just pivoted every question to "what about those Kurdi terrorists?"

Pakistan being questioned about whether Chinese buying their government bonds means having some leverage over them, it's turned around to "what about America? China holds American debt, too!"

Point out nuts and bolts realities of geopolitical trade in the modern era, get an oblique reply about 'grasping hold of our own destiny' or some other useless platitude.
 
Luxembourg was German occupied, that's how Juncker's father got to join the German army.

Not only occupied, which would explain nothing, but also annexed to Germany. Which is the real fact that constrained young Luxembourgish men to enroll in the German army.

And yes there might have been some volunteers among them, but you still do no prove it might have been the case of Juncker's father. And by the way I am still waiting for an evidence he was an officer in the Wehrmacht
 
Truth is, world war history is still relatively recent so what you did in the war is a relevant question in determining a politician's motivation and psyche.

As a matter of fact there are not much politicians left who played a role during WWII. Last week the USA just buried a former president who enrolled during WWII.

Furthermore in the case at hand Jean-Claude Juncker was born almost ten years after the end of WWII. How could then what he "did in the war is a relevant question in determining his motivation and psyche"?
 
They were his fellows in that they were equally Luxembourgers, entitled to live their lives in peace and free from persecution and assault, just as much as he was.
So when you said "fellow Jews", you actually meant to say "fellow Luxemburgers who, unlike him, were Jews"? Because that is definitely not what "fellow Jews" means.
 
Lucky Juncker: his dad got to live to >90 whilst his fellow Jews did not.

Which has nothing to do with Juncker senior at all, anymore than it has to do with 90+% of the population of occupied-Luxembourg.

They did not control what the Nazis chose to do, so you implying there is somehow some relationship between these things is your usual desperate nonsense.
Juncker has publicly said he resents the British press for mentioning his father's role in WWII.

I'm not bloody surprised.
The tabloid press in this country (which includes the Telegraph and usually the Times) is hopeless at doing actual journalism.
The Sun's implicatin was that his father was a Nazi, and they didn't give a toss whether it was true or not.

Luxembourg was German occupied, that's how Juncker's father got to join the German army.

Yeessss.

Now can you see why that has no implication at all on whether he was a Nazi?

Can you see why people who were born in Germany before the war might be more likely to be Nazis, than someone who was born in Luxembourg and only became "German" when their country was annexed in 1940? Who only became a soldier because he was conscripted?
 
It's what I read somewhere.

Where? We know he wasn't in the SS, so if you read he was an SS officer then it was clearly wrong; the only question is whether both claims were wrong.

Juncker's father was working-class, which implies he worked his way up and committed himself to its ideals.

Or that he remained a conscript. Before you can discuss the implications of him having been an officer, you have to establish that he was an officer. "I read it somewhere" isn't good enough.

Truth is, world war history is still relatively recent so what you did in the war is a relevant question in determining a politician's motivation and psyche.

However, stuff people make up about what your father did in the war is not.

Dave
 
Juncker has publicly said he resents the British press for mentioning his father's role in WWII.

How does this make him unreasonable, exactly?

Attacking the father of the president of the European comission because you want your country to exit the EU is an extremely low form of character assasination. It's not even a character assasination, it's just spewing random feces, hoping they stick somewhere.

It's low even by Brexit standards and that's saying something.

I mean come on, it's like saying the UK sucks, because a second cousin twice removed of their reigning monarch brutalized Congo. I'm sure many Britons would resent that too.

McHrozni
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom