No, Bjarne, it has been done before. Early in this exchage, I thin half a year ago, I referred you to a site where you could find a skeleton protocol for measuring the gravity of a building. That was a US college homepage, because it was used as a college assignment.
I have never "got" such message.
Did they do exact systematically central measurement to test the existing speculation or only random measurements for fun?
Where are your source?
How big was the building?
It has probably been done hundreds of times before.
The systematic way it is done is important.
What I mean; - systematical test of inner central gravity (of a mass), have probably never been done before.
Nowhere people do such measurement for fun. - Not today, - not last year - and not 10 years ago, and not tomorrow.
It is pretty expensive. Before you measure you'll have a reason with doing that.
My reason to do this is very clear.
I don't believe anyone ever seriously have doubted the old speculation, and declare open war to it.
Hence also not that there ever have been a wish to test the old speculation.
Furthermore first after gravimeter devices have been more sophisticated (the last decade) (decades?) - It really makes sense to do it.
And, of course, there was the deep-bore measurement, which we told you about, but which you insisted on ignoring.
I still chose to ignore that, because inside the earth you cannot observe where ADG contribution comes from, but only guessing and accused the inner core for what you want.
Once in the eighties there was some strange measurement result in a mine in Australia.
That had leads to a search for a fight force, in many mines, and different places.
A lot of drilling where necessary to determinate the underground contents, and still there was several uncertainties where unexpected measurements could be caused by unknown contents nearby or deeper beneath.
Even in the ice core measurements you can invent mountains or rocks beneath that maybe do or do not exist, or as mentioned, - the inner core doesn’t answer back if you accuse that for having a weight or size, - that you want it to.
You are not breaking new ground at all, you are just wading in the footsteps of others, producing sloppy data, which you don't know how to use.
Reality has spoken; If you are clever, - drop that unsound speculation now.
Next time reality speaks, it will be with a bulldozer technique.
You can’t save the dying (in fact already dead) thesis, - it is already too late.
.