Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It not proves my theory, no off course not, but it is just one of MANY broad hints that shows a direction

Assuming the anomaly still hasn't been sorted, it may show a direction towards a refinement of GR, but it definitely doesn't show a direction towards your idea. Unless you can demonstrate it does.
 
It not proves my theory, no off course not, but it is just one of MANY broad hints that shows a direction

What do you mean ?
I thought you read up on everything in his thories seeing that you think you have found something new.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Assuming the anomaly still hasn't been sorted, it may show a direction towards a refinement of GR, but it definitely doesn't show a direction towards your idea. Unless you can demonstrate it does.

Measure Central Gravity and realizing that ADG is stable (in a homogenous mass) must start a chain reaction.

Then the cabala will almost solve it self, - off course dark matter, the cause of the mercury anomaly, a misunderstood "inertia", etc…..is doomed to be thrown out of the window.

IT ALL FITS

If you think this is not true...show me just one single peice that not fit..

PLEASE Not confused repeated RC..big blue junkyard .bla bla bla, - but simple cow logic understandable fact.
 
Measure Central Gravity and realizing that ADG is stable (in a homogenous mass) must start a chain reaction.

If ADG is measured to be constant, then yes we will have to rethink a lot.

Then the cabala will almost solve it self, - off course dark matter, the cause of the mercury anomaly, a misunderstood "inertia", etc…..is doomed to be thrown out of the window.

Not necessarily. How do you know those things in particular will need to be different?

IT ALL FITS

If you think this is not true...show me just one single peice that not fit..

Burden of proof is on you, not me.
I'm not going to spend the time working out a mathematical framework for your crackpot idea just to show you it's wrong.

So show me something that does fit, and how it fits. Don't just say it does.
 
Not necessarily. How do you know those things in particular will need to be different?

Even if we replace the expression; curvature with stretch, it is off course still an abstract “picture” of space, like it always have been, and always will be.

The prevailing understands of ADG can be compared with a picture of the citizens in USA.
Let say a sect believes that the citizens living by the coast eat solid food, the further away from the coast people only eat soup, and the deeper we get into the country the soup gets thinner and thinner until it is only water. In the central state of USA people live at air, and exactly in Central America people never eat.

Exactly so silly is our understanding of central gravity, included; what mass attraction is, and what causing ADG.

Now replace the lunch in USA with space consuming matter.
In the centre of a mass, - it must be a bigger space- vacuum since that area is encircled by space consuming matter.
Already at this point you “should” be able to smell what “dark matter” really is and the cause of “black holes”.
If still not try to put a hamburger exactly in the centre of 1000 hungry people that not have eaten in 3 days.
What would happen if there was 1 hamburger and 100.000 hungry people ?
This is a picture showing you that central space also is affected. Also central matter demands space doesn’t matter what so ever.

Now place 2 hungry lions between hamburgers.
Is it difficult to figure out what will happen?
This is a “picture” of mass attraction, as well as ADG.
The bigger the Lions are the more the hamburger is affected.
Almost the same what happens to the hamburger happens to space between the Moon and the Earth.

And by the way, if this really is so, can you see the other consequences too?
I mean can you see HOW matter and space is connected?

If not:
Space and matter is almost “woven together”
If you move matter you MUST disturb the whole Universe.
And since matter and space is connected, space must move when matter moves.
And the same thing opposite. When space moves matter woven into that space MUST move as well.

And so it goes like I said; a unstoppable chain reaction.

Just follow this main thread steep by step, let the chain reaction lead you and you will come to the exact same conclusion, like I already have explained several times. – ( The Mercury Anomaly. Resistance against motion, Cosmological redshift. etc etc. etc. etc.)
NOT because I have invented it, but because it is logical consequences that automatically follows like I said; a chain reaction.

You have properly often hear, that according to Einstein gravity is ONLY , the curvature of space. Not even a force.

But what about mass attraction?
Try to explain the cause of it if gravity not should be a force. – IMPOSSIBLE.
Why is space “curving” if gravity not is force? – IMPOSSIBLE.
We can not just drop Newton’s point of view and blindfold us self with the clumsy “curvature of space expression”, there is a lot more to get involved in.

GR is a half wind and a pretext for doing nothing (except higgs-fantasy) .
It is possible to get a MUCH better basic and coherent understanding of the nature of space, gravity, mass attraction, ADG and all what follows when this basics nature of space is better understood.

Sooner or later we must reach a united understanding of both Newtonian gravity and GR.

This is the key to what lays behind both.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Wrong, stop going to these sites, they are bogus. Energy also has mass and makes gravity. And spin is just a metaphor, we don't know if there is really a spin.

Paul

:) :) :)
That's Bjarne's website!
 
A Mathematical Model for the Dynamics and Synchronization of Cows

Unfortunately I can't post the link but I'm sure Bjarne will appreciate this new preprint on arxiv.org as it is about cows:

"A Mathematical Model for the Dynamics and Synchronization of Cows"
 
Now place 2 hungry lions between hamburgers.
Is it difficult to figure out what will happen?
This is a “picture” of mass attraction, as well as ADG.
The bigger the Lions are the more the hamburger is affected.
Almost the same what happens to the hamburger happens to space between the Moon and the Earth.

Unfortunately I can't post the link but I'm sure Bjarne will appreciate this new preprint on arxiv.org as it is about cows:

"A Mathematical Model for the Dynamics and Synchronization of Cows"


Oops, too late George, please see above! Bjarne just turned his poor cows into hamburger in the service of the most tortured and meaningless analogy in the history of "science". :D

And welcome!

ferd
 
Wrong: Matter is not a force.
Gravity is a force.
The strong force is a force.
The weak force is a force.
EM forces are forces.
It is possible that that forces can be unified in one theory.

Matter is energy, that energy is a force.

It doesn't change what I said, if anything, it only proves it.
Right
Take it easy, it will be done.


Oops, too late George, please see above! Bjarne just turned his poor cows into hamburger in the service of the most tortured and meaningless analogy in the history of "science".

Finally one that understood
The hamburger and the cows are united.

-----
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom