Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[Reality Check]

I have not my calculator here, but based on some old file on my laptop it seems RAM affect the Earth with about 2 * 97591 m = 195182 meter ( 195 km ) radius extension per year.

So you asert using your imaginary RAM that the Earth's orbit increases by 195 km per year.
You are obvously ignorant of the accurate meaurments of the Earth's orbit

• aphelion 152,098,232 km
• perihelion 147,098,290 km
• semimajor 149,598,261 km

These are cited to the kilometer, implying an accuracy of 1 kilometer or less. Scientists would notice the measurements that they have taken over the decades steadily increasing by 195 km per year.

Also try some simple math - divide those numbers by 195 to see when the Earth was in the center of the Sun !
(about 779,990 years ago!)

 

[Bjarne]

So you asert using your imaginary RAM that the Earth's orbit increases by 195 km per year.
You are obvously ignorant of the accurate meaurments of the Earth's orbit

• aphelion 152,098,232 km
• perihelion 147,098,290 km
• semimajor 149,598,261 km

These are cited to the kilometer, implying an accuracy of 1 kilometer or less. Scientists would notice the measurements that they have taken over the decades steadily increasing by 195 km per year.

Also try some simple math - divide those numbers by 195 to see when the Earth was in the center of the Sun !
(about 779,990 years ago!)

And how do you then believe these are measured sir?

 

[Bjarne]

Also try some simple math - divide those numbers by 195 to see when the Earth was in the center of the Sun !
(about 779,990 years ago!)

No
because when aphelion is ahead of the Suns motion direction, the orbit of the planet gets back to a circular orbit sir.

 

[Reality Check]

And how do you then believe these are measured sir?

And how do you then believe these are measured sir?
And why does it matter?

 

[Reality Check]

No
because when aphelion is ahead of the Suns motion direction, the orbit of the planet gets back to a circular orbit sir.

Wrong, sir.
Planets do not have circular orbits. All of the planets have elliptical orbits of different degrees of eccentricity. That is why they have an aphelion.

 

[Bjarne]

1 Million Years ago, the perihelion precession of the Earth took only 40.000 years
http://www.nbi.ku.dk/Nyheder/nyheder_09/bratte_klimaskift
It is a big mystery how that suddenly was changing.
The answer is properly that this solves itself the day we include RAM in the modeling of the whole Solar system.
For example Jupiter’s orbit ellipse will also get much deeper due to RAM, as previously thought so will off course Saturn’s orbit etc.
This again will shorten the distance to affect the Earth’s orbit.
When it comes to the full range of RAM I have come to the food of a huge maintain. One day all will climb in that mountain. Cows did that 8 million years ago.

 

[Bjarne]

And how do you then believe these are measured sir?
And why does it matter?

It matter because it is not measured.
It is calculated, basic based on Kepler...etc.....
You can also calculate the length of a cow wrong, but when you forget the tail what is it worth ?

 

[Bjarne]

Wrong, sir.
Planets do not have circular orbits. All of the planets have elliptical orbits of different degrees of eccentricity.

Yes it is almost a catastrophe I forgot "almost"
I thought you could figure that out.
Anyway sir - It will be cold down under.
Buy a plot in Sahara so long the prices are all right...

 

[Reality Check]

It matter because it is not measured.
It is calculated, basic based on Kepler...etc.....
You can also calculate the length of a cow wrong, but when you forget the tail what is it worth ?

So now Kepler is wrong too?

How do you know that it is based on Kepler...etc.....?
What numbers do you get for the Earth's orbit using your replacement for "Kepler...etc....."?
but wait ... all you have is vague ideas and invalid mathematics for you non-existent RAM .

And lets add another little problem with your RAM fantasy:
What about spacecraft? For some reason NASA has not noticed the 195 km rate of increase in the Earth's orbit despite sending spacecraft on trips of various lengths.
They have not even noticed any rate of increase in the orbits of other planets.

 

[Bjarne]

So now Kepler is wrong too?

How do you know that it is based on Kepler...etc.....?

I did not say that
You must use Kepler and all what effects the planets
also RAM

 

[Reality Check]

I did not say that
You must use Kepler and all what effects the planets
also RAM

Scientists do use Kepler and all what effects the planets to work out the orbits of planets. The orbits they work out work. They can get spacecraft to and from solar objects. They can use Kepler (actually Newton) to put spacecraft in specific places in the Solar System.
RAM is your personal delusion based on abysmal math skills and the inability to understand that it is experimentally and theoretically wrong:

• Experimental proof that Bjarne "kinetic resistance" is wrong
  First asked 2 November 2009
• Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance" (the above post expanded).

RAM does not conserve energy:

• Energy is not conserved in Bjarne's universe!
  First asked 26 November 2009

And the real flaw with RAM is Bjarne's crewing up the units of measurement: RAM = y-1 where y is the Lorentz factor.
So we have a number without units and subtract 1 from it to another number without units.
The idiocy of thinking that a number without units has the units of acceleration is obvious to every one except Bjarne.

The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)

 

[Reality Check]

1 Million Years ago, the perihelion precession of the Earth took only 40.000 yearso.

1 Million Years ago, according to your RAM fantasy, the Earth did not exist because it was at the center of the Sun:

Also try some simple math - divide those numbers by 195 to see when the Earth was in the center of the Sun !
(about 779,990 years ago!)

(emphasis added)

 

[Bjarne]

Scientists do use Kepler and all what effects the planets to work out the orbits of planets. The or\its they work out work.

RAM is your personal delusion:

Nature proves in front of your closed eyes, - that RAM ALWAYS and I repeat ALWAYS is true.

Keep your eyes closed and you have solved the problem.

I can see that RAM solved several mysteries.
Month ago I denied that the perihelion precession anomaly of Mercury could be solved. But I had really not much to replace that thesis.

Last week I was researching possible evidence for “Dark Matter” and suddenly I saw how RAM is the answer to solve both the perihelion precession anomaly of Mercury, but also how exactly that gentle push that is exactly what the Milankovic really need .

Furthermore I am sure it also can and will solve the 40.000 years cycle mystery.

This is not because I want this to happen, but because I realized that; planet-RAM, - must be understood relative to the Sun’s motion…..the result will automatically display itself based on known math...

I do not need to do anything else as following the main thread, nothing else...
I think the greatest mystery is not any of these we find in nature, but rather that there exists people that can keep ignoring how a simple innocent logical obvious aspect of nature, - for example the fact that it never is proven that the RAM (we know is a fact by acceleration), suddenly should be zero by constant speed,. (!)
Also even if a correct understanding easy can solve mystery after mystery after mystery, - and still people cannot see the light.
It is simply amazing

 

[Bjarne]

1 Million Years ago, according to your RAM fantasy, the Earth did not exist because it was at the center of the Sun:

Repeat:
No
because when aphelion is ahead of the Suns motion direction, (which happens each 50.000 year) the orbit of the planet gets back to a (almost) circular orbit sir.

 

[Reality Check]

Nature proves in front of your closed eyes, - that RAM ALWAYS and I repeat ALWAYS is true.

Nature proves in front of your closed eyes, - that RAM ALWAYS and I repeat ALWAYS is false:

• Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance"
• Energy is not conserved in Bjarne's universe!
  First asked 26 November 2009

Your own incompetence proves in front of your closed eyes, - that RAM ALWAYS and I repeat ALWAYS is false:
And the real flaw with RAM is Bjarne's crewing up the units of measurement: RAM = y-1 where y is the Lorentz factor.
So we have a number without units and subtract 1 from it to another number without units.
The idiocy of thinking that a number without units has the units of acceleration is obvious to every one except Bjarne.

The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)

 

[Reality Check]

Repeat:
No
because when aphelion is ahead of the Suns motion direction, (which happens each 50.000 year) the orbit of the planet gets back to a (almost) circular orbit sir.

No when aphelion is ahead of the Suns motion direction, (which happens each 50.000 year) the orbit of the planet remains as an elliptical (never circular) orbit sir.

No sir, you stated

I have not my calculator here, but based on some old file on my laptop it seems RAM affect the Earth with about 2 * 97591 m = 195182 meter ( 195 km ) radius extension per year.

This mean that after 100.000 year, - we shall expect aphelion to be the half of; 19.518.200 meter ( 19,5 million km.) further away from the Sun as today.

That also means that less than 1 million years ago the aphelion was in the center of the Sun, i.e. the Earth was at the center of the Sun !

 

[MRC_Hans]

Get used to it, - RAM is real...

Bjarne seems to have invented a new fallacy. As a working title, I shall call it "the false claim persistence fallacy": The idea that if you persist doggedly in making a false claim long enough it somehow gains weight.

Bjarne, your RAM does not exist. It has no basis in theory, it has never been observed in reality, the universe would function differently if it existed; in short, this parrot wouldn't woom if you put 10,000 volts through it.

- And no matter how often you claim it, it will not start to be true.

Thank you for today.
I will continue my "holydays"

Do consider reading a physics book in your lesure time.

.....

To the others: If that level of nonsense continues I'm not wasting more time on this puppy.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

I think the greatest mystery is not any of these we find in nature, but rather that there exists people that can keep ignoring how a simple innocent logical obvious aspect of nature, - for example the fact that it never is proven that the RAM (we know is a fact by acceleration), suddenly should be zero by constant speed,. (!)
Also even if a correct understanding easy can solve mystery after mystery after mystery, - and still people cannot see the light.
It is simply amazing

I think it is simply amazing that you are unable to imagine this possibility:

That the thousands of scientists that have studies ad worked with this professionally, understand the background physiscs and can really do the math, understand the whole thing a good deal better than you. Heck, I understand the whole thing better than you!

SO, Bjarne, it is all very simple: You are wrong. You haven't understood the physics, you can't do even fairly simple math, you can't plan and execute useful experiments, you can't interpret the results of experiments properly, and you can't make logical conclusions. You are simply getting it wrong.

In fact, your "theory" is not only wrong, in the sense that it has some single basic flaw; it is total and unadulterated nonsense, from one end to the other. It doesn't even function logically.

In short, it is ridiculous.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Bjarne, when you get back, look at this thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202335

I'm sure you and this guy will have a lot to talk about.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Mercury’s Simi Major axis is right now getting 120661 meter (divided with 3,14) shorter per year..
Also the Semi Major Axis of Mars is getting shorter.

This happens because of the aphelion of these planets is ahead of the Suns motion direction.

Moving faster as the Sun means stronger RAM, this will push the “aphelion half parts” of the orbit backwards, to more circular orbits.

The opposite happens to the Earth and Venus. Theses Semi Major Axis is getting larger, due to RAM.

This knowledge is crucial for understanding ice -ages, and makes suddenly the Milankovitch theory perfect.

Without it the Milankovitch theory doesn’t make much sense.

What we should do is to send a space probe towards the Suns motion direction (without any swingby) . This Space probe would decelerate.

And we should send a space probe opposite the Suns motion direction, towards Aquarius, also without any swing by, (or close to other planets), - this space probe will move faster as expected.