Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Every cow knows that to an observer on the object, the mass does not change and neither does the gravity
Click to expand...
Crap.....

SR and GR

If the Earth suddenly would speed up to + 10.000 m/s it would be correct to say that time would tick slower due to larger speed. (SR)

But it would also be correct to say that due to larger speed > mass/gravity would increase (GR) and due to > gravity increase time would tick slower, simply because we would be deeper into a (larger) gravitational field (GR) as before.

Therefore also the following statement is off also course also agianst cow logic;
Every cow knows that SR states that observers measure that the objects act as if they increase mass with increasing vleocity.
Click to expand...

The effects of both SR and GR are real....Which make the accusation against cows (the statement above) to a big lie.

cowstamp.jpg


SR and GR overlap each other and describes the same reality...

Muuuuuhh
 
Last edited:
Just for the record:

Bjarne said:
You can find no quotes that states; cows are more stupid than you.
This is one of the main essences of this thread.
Click to expand...

Bjarne said:
You are a liar, since I never call people in this thread stupid.
Click to expand...

You're a liar, Bjarne.

Now, remember what happened last time you called other people stupid? You spent months and months doing it, going on and on and on about how you were right and everybody else was wrong. Then, finally, you realised that everybody was right and that you had been wrong all along.

Perhaps there's a lesson to be learned in there somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Sceptic Tank said:
Just for the record:





You're a liar, Bjarne.

Now, remember what happened last time you called other people stupid? You spent months and months doing it, going on and on and on about how you were right and everybody else was wrong. Then, finally, you realised that everybody was right and that you had been wrong all along.

Perhaps there's a lesson to be learned in there somewhere.
Click to expand...

A 2% error margin is acceptable.
 
Something for Bjarne to ponder while he has some free time:

relativity A collective term for two theories, special relativity and general relativity, developed by A. Einstein. The special theory of relativity, published in 1905, is concerned with the laws of physics as viewed by observers moving relative to each other at constant speed (i.e. not subject to acceleration). It describes how the motion of one observer relative to another affects measurements made by these observers. At low speeds special relativity reduces to situations describable by classical physics, embodied in Newton's laws of motion. Differences between Newton's and Einstein's physics become apparent only at velocities towards that of light. The general theory of relativity (1915) describes how the relationship between space and time is affected by the gravitational effects of matter (see gravitation) and how space and time change as seen by an observer on an accelerating object. The theory concludes that gravitational fields created by the presence of matter cause spacetime to become curved. This curvature controls the motion of bodies in space.
"relativity" A Dictionary of Astronomy. Ian Ridpath. Oxford University Press, 2007​
 
Paul said:
Something for Bjarne to ponder while he has some free time:

relativity A collective term for two theories, special relativity and general relativity, developed by A. Einstein. The special theory of relativity, published in 1905, is concerned with the laws of physics as viewed by observers moving relative to each other at constant speed (i.e. not subject to acceleration). It describes how the motion of one observer relative to another affects measurements made by these observers. At low speeds special relativity reduces to situations describable by classical physics, embodied in Newton's laws of motion. Differences between Newton's and Einstein's physics become apparent only at velocities towards that of light. The general theory of relativity (1915) describes how the relationship between space and time is affected by the gravitational effects of matter (see gravitation) and how space and time change as seen by an observer on an accelerating object. The theory concludes that gravitational fields created by the presence of matter cause spacetime to become curved. This curvature controls the motion of bodies in space.
"relativity" A Dictionary of Astronomy. Ian Ridpath. Oxford University Press, 2007​
Click to expand...

And common for both GR and SR is the tension on space.
 
Well, I’m sure Bjarne needs a holiday. ;)

Actually, his latest antics are another example of his incoherent ad hoc theses: He has been hell-bent on explaining that his resistance against motion (RAM) is due to magnetic drag. But in that he forgets the reason he introduced the concept from the start.

You see, way back when I first met him (in a Danish forum), he was going on about how the suction of space pulled planets and moons around, I then told him that for that to happen, there had to be friction between a body in motion and the fabric of space. First he denied it, but then he had a private revelation (even thanking me for showing him the light), and incorporated it into his strange model.

Now, he seems to have forgotten the reason he needed RAM and is trying for a new explanation.

It shall be (moderately) interesting to see what new ideas he has concocted when he returns.

Hans
 
Actually, his latest antics are another example of his incoherent ad hoc theses: He has been hell-bent on explaining that his resistance against motion (RAM) is due to magnetic drag. But in that he forgets the reason he introduced the concept from the start.
Click to expand...
"Magnetic drag" is a result of RAM
 
RAM does not exist and so "magnetic drag" is not due to RAM.
RAM has been tested experimentally at high velocities and does not exist
RAM does not conserve energy:
And the real flaw with RAM is Bjarne's crewing up the units of measurement: RAM = y-1 where y is the Lorentz factor.
So we have a number without units and subtract 1 from it to another number without units.
The idiocy of thinking that a number without units has the units of acceleration is obvious to every one except Bjarne.

The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
 
Unification of the Special & General Relativity Theory.

When something, for example a kitchen moves fast, - distances & time shrinks, - but the mass (and energy) of that kitchen are increasing proportional with the speed increase.
This mean gravity too is increasing.
According to the new theory (presented here) matter will absorb space proportional with the gravity increase.
When space is gradually stronger consumed/absorbed/twisted around elementary particles, - space, and hence also distances and the meter stick must shrink.
kitc.jpg

Therefore the reason to that; the kitchen shrinks by high speed, is in fact; - the increasing gravity.

So it is not only possible, but necessary to connect / unite SR and GR whereby apparently these 2 “different" theories unite…..

Now look at the shrinking kitchen again, - it will not only shrink due to higher speed, b- ut also due to larger gravity.

It is the exact same thing that happens, according to GR - when we move the kitchen from a weak field of gravity to a strong one.

Already both theories (SR+GR) have included the time deviation.
All what we need to do is; to copy the distances deviation from SR and paste it to GR, and that’s it.

All what this will “violate” is that the perihelion precession of Mercury (43 arc second per century).
This phenomena is not caused due to SR, -, simply because distances (and the meter stick) always appears to be the same (relative to anything else) for any local observer, - doesn’t matter if the local observer ;
- is sitting in his kitchen by fast speed,
or
- when he (and the kitchen) is moved to a different stronger or weaker field of gravity.

Because of both distances as well as time both are deformed due to stronger gravity, for example near the sun, in Mercury’s orbit, - this will NOT cause Mercury to; reach longer distances, per time, simply because distances by Mercury is proportional shorter exactly as a second is.

GR and SR must be united.

There is no reason not to do so...

The only "reason" is that we have not really understood what the so called "curvature of space" really mean.
The day we understand the meaning> curvature of space = absorbed space, - we are forced to unite SR and GR.

I will post the evidence in the next post.
 
Last edited:
Reality Check said:
You are mistaken: SR ands GR are not 2 separate theories. GR includes SR - they are already unified.
Click to expand...

Fine then you are also ready to understand that time cannot change without distances does the same.

And this cannot mean anything else that > The perihelion precession anomaly of Mercury not is solved..

If you say A you must also say B...
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Fine then you are also ready to understand that time cannot change without distances does the same.
Click to expand...
I have understood for years that different observers in SR and GR observe different rates of time (time dilation) and measure differerent lengths (length contraction).
What you understand though is unknown.

Bjarne said:
And this cannot mean anything else that > The perihelion precession anomaly of Mercury not is solved..
Click to expand...
And this cannot mean anything else that > you cannot read:
General relativity solves the perihelion precession anomaly of Mercury.
 
The true reason of the Mercury perihelion precession anomaly, and the Ice ages

The true reason of the Mercury perihelion precession anomaly, and the Ice ages.

RAM in the solar system must be understood relative to the motion we already have, - and hence due to the Sun's orbit velocity round the MilkyWay..
innerp.jpg


Green dot = Perihelion
Red dot = Apehelion

The resistances against motion (RAM) must be seen from a perspective “from the sun”

RAM is larger when the orbit direction of planets are the same as the solar systems (The Sun’s) motion direction, - simply because in this case the planets are relative faster as the sun.

RAM is weaker, - when the planet’s motion directions are opposite the Sun's motion direction.

This simple fact is contributing to the perihelion precession of all planets.
And can be calculated based on the equation discussion ( a lot in this thread)...

The contribution of the perihelion precession speed of Mercury and other planets are not large..

But it get worse - because the RAM is not only contributing to the perihelion precession speed, but is also extending the planet orbit size dramatically.

I have not my calculator here, but based on some old file on my laptop it seems RAM affect the Earth with about 2 * 97591 m = 195182 meter ( 195 km ) radius extension per year.

This mean that after 100.000 year, - we shall expect aphelion to be the half of; 19.518.200 meter ( 19,5 million km.) further away from the Sun as today.

We all know that something is wrong and right with the Milankovitch cycles, at least with the 100.000 years cycle.
This cycle should had the strongest impact on the temperature of Earth, because this is what experiences tell us.
But calculation has since 1940 shown something was not correct, this period appears to be the weakest.

The 100,000-year problem is that the eccentricity variations have a significantly smaller impact on solar forcing than precession or obliquity and hence might be expected to produce the weakest effects. However, observations show that during the last 1 million years, the strongest climate signal is the 100,000-year cycle. In addition, despite the relatively great 100,000-year cycle, some have argued that the length of the climate record is insufficient to establish a statistically significant relationship between climate and eccentricity variations.[8] Some models can however reproduce the 100,000 year cycles as a result of non-linear interactions between small changes in the Earth's orbit and internal oscillations of the climate system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovic_cycles
Click to expand...
RAM is the answer.....

The "traditional" Milankovitch explanation struggles to explain the dominance of the 100,000-year cycle over the last 8 cycles
http://translate.google.dk/translate?hl=da&langpair=en|da&u=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age
Click to expand...
RAM is the answer...

Not a single cow in the Universe does not take RAM very serious, this should had had the highest priority, but well we are; “only humans”.

So after about 50.000 years RC, (Perihelion will be in July) and the Earth is most likely about 19.5 million km (divided with 2 = 9,75 million km) closer to the Sun as anyone believe today.

This mean RC will have hell hot summers.
But don’t worry RC you will have dame cold winters as well because Aphelion will be in January when the Earth will be 9,75 million further away from you, and that will give you a dame cold winter too, so a lot of ice and snow can cool down your too hot summer.

This process is already begun, this is what you can see, if you just open your eyes and look at the images above.

The nice almost circular orbit of the Earth of today, has already now begun to increase its semi major axis, and will (as I wrote above) culminate after 50.000 years.

The summer on the Northern thermosphere will be colder and the winter will be warmer.
(This is also what we already see today.)

After the first 50.000 years has gone, the large ellipse will begin to “normalize” to a circle again.

In this process winter will again begin to be colder on the northern thermosphere etc…..

This statement is only based on RAM, -

There are off course more to consider

  • Planet orbits will push and drag the orbit of the Earth, and these will all change too.
  • The 2 other Milankovitch cycles
  • The sun’s period (Henrik Svensmark)
  • CO2
  • Who knows.... for exsample this ...http://www.science27.com/english/magnetism.html

All these can probably reinforces or weaken the effect.

BUT the period I just described is the basic one and most importance really to understand.

If someone have not understood the meaning shown in the image, --- begin to understand that the orbit of Mars is allready now is in a process to be much more circular.
the orther 3 inner planet will all get larger semi major axis the next 50.000 year.

This will soon be confirmed by observations....

Get used to it, - RAM is real...


Thank you for today.
I will continue my "holydays"
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
...snipped gibberish....
Get used to it, - RAM is real...
Click to expand...
Get used to it, - RAM is fake...
RAM does not conserve energy:
And the real flaw with RAM is Bjarne's crewing up the units of measurement: RAM = y-1 where y is the Lorentz factor.
So we have a number without units and subtract 1 from it to another number without units.
The idiocy of thinking that a number without units has the units of acceleration is obvious to every one except Bjarne.

The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom