Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[Paul]

According to the prevailing theses, - > The ADG curve MUST cross the FAG (green line), and become negative - otherwise there is no COG.

So how can we get the ADG line below the green line - dear ?

This is what happens if I use Hans' baseline ADG and the elevation offset for the ground floor:

as if by magic the graph is the same shape but now satisfies your criterion.

 

[Bjarne]

This is what happens if I use Hans' baseline ADG and the elevation offset for the ground floor:

Try for a moment to forget the baseline crap .

Imaging you are walking under the Moon, - Suddenly a apple falls down on your head, - but you are lucky because the moon pulls upwards and therefore the apple will accelerate a little less, as it would had done when the moon not was hanging above you head, and therefore the apple does not hit you so hard.

Do you agree ?

Let us therefore say that the FAG is 308,5 µgal/m and the Moon contributes to weaken the Earth pull with 1,5 µgal/m – Total = decreasing ADG is therefore 310 µgal/m

Do you agree (in principle) ?

Now imging you are walking at the parking area at Domus Vista.
Let’s say still the FAG is decreasing 308,5 µgal/m, and let say that you also expect Domus Vista to pull the apple a bit upwards to the same total decrease = 310 µgal/m, - exactly as the moon did.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

So now forget the Moon, - imaging you are walking through the main door to the Ground Floor at Domus Vista.
You should now expect that the apple would accelerate a little less, - exactly as the Moon prevented the apple to accelerate too fast.

Do you agree ?

BUT what does really happens here?
Mamma Mia the apple is accelerating much too fast, the acceleration is NOT less as the FAG, - the ADG is in fact faster as the FAG.

Try this; - The ADG difference between Ground floor and first floor = 1202 µgal/m
This gives you a decrease from the Earth ADG = 1202 µgal/m per 420 cm or = 286 µgal/m.
So according to simple cow logic the apple is accelerating 310 µgal/m (the FAG) – minus 286 µgal/m = 24 µgal/m too fast, - AT GROUND FLOOR of that stupid building………….(!)

Do you agree (in principle) ?

This is where the prevailing thesis died, - just because of a stupid apple, - and you can see from the measurement data this would happen on all the lower floors. This is completely AGAINST the prevailing thesis.

Do you agree ?

And it get worse, - because the further up in that stupid building you climb the faster will the apples ADG hunt you.

THIS IS OBJECTIVE A FACT. – IT WILL HAPPEN LIKE I JUST WROTE – because THIS is what we have measured.

Do you agree ?

Shortly – ADG at the lower floor are FASTER as the FAG, - you SHOULD expect the opposite, - exactly as you should under the Moon.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

Falling apples, cows and stones give a damn in baseline craps.

Do you agree ?


So if you don’t believe it, I suggest go to the first floor at Domus Vista, - drop an apple in the head of Hans standing at Ground Floor. . If Hans do not have time to move, - I am right.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

After finishing this experiment tells me PLEASE where is the damn COG?

Still am talking about systematical measurement we have done, relative to a FAG line, PLEASE stick to that.

It is here and now we are talking about, - not year 1960 before the building was build.

To make a long history short, - THERE ARE NO UPWARDS PULL , - in that building (if the FAG standard really is true)
And there is therefore also not detected any COG where you expect it to be.

No baseline crap can save the old creeds from falling.........

Something is rotten....................

And that’s it..

Get use to it.

 

[Marcus]

Here's the deal, Bjarne stilll hasn't show why Dark Energy is an illusion, will someone with balls shut this thread down.

Paul

Dark energy is an illusion because the cows can't see it.

 

[Paul]

Try for a moment to forget the baseline crap .

Just one of the many reasons that you can't progress and nobody takes you seriously.

Imaging you are walking under the Moon, - Suddenly a apple falls down on your head...

To misquote Father Ted: The Earth is big and the moon is far away.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

No, I disagree on principle.

Inventing ridiculous scenarios because you can't find anything real to support you is a wast of everyone's time.

Now imging you are walking at the parking area at Domus Vista.
Let’s say still the FAG is decreasing 308,5 µgal/m, and let say that you also expect Domus Vista to pull the apple a bit upwards to the same total decrease = 310 µgal/m, - exactly as the moon did.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

No, you appear to be completely failing to understand anything you have been taught.

So now forget the Moon, - imaging you are walking through the main door to the Ground Floor at Domus Vista.
You should now expect that the apple would accelerate a little less, - exactly as the Moon prevented the apple to accelerate too fast.

Do you agree ?

Bjarne, things with mass attract each other but gravity is very weak. Therefore, a building will make no practical difference to the acceleration of an apple on earth.

BUT what does really happens here?

Certainly not what you think.

Mamma Mia the apple is accelerating much too fast, the acceleration is NOT less as the FAG, - the ADG is in fact faster as the FAG.

free-air correction (Faye correction) The correction applied to a measurement of gravity which allows for the variation of gravity with height above a reference level, usually sea level. This correction assumes there is only air between the station and the reference level, and it is 0.3086 mgal/m

The FAG simply describes the reduction that should be made to the baseline gravity to remove the influence of the earth from the data.

So to work with the gravity of the building alone you need a baseline gravity without the building and the elevation of each measurement.

Try this; - The ADG difference between Ground floor and first floor = 1202 µgal/m

No. It's 1202 µGal or 286.19 µGal/m, there's an important difference.

This gives you a decrease from the Earth ADG = 1202 µgal/m per 420 cm or = 286 µgal/m.

No, it gives you the difference between the two measurements.

So according to simple cow logic the apple is accelerating 310 µgal/m (the FAG) – minus 286 µgal/m = 24 µgal/m too fast, - AT GROUND FLOOR of that stupid building………….(!)

No.

Do you agree (in principle) ?

No.

This is where the prevailing thesis died, - just because of a stupid apple, - and you can see from the measurement data this would happen on all the lower floors. This is completely AGAINST the prevailing thesis.

Do you agree ?

No. Please try to understand the basics before trying to be clever with data you can't understand.

And it get worse, - because the further up in that stupid building you climb the faster will the apples ADG hunt you.


THIS IS OBJECTIVE A FACT. – IT WILL HAPPEN LIKE I JUST WROTE – because THIS is what we have measured.

Do you agree ?

I can't agree as I have no idea what you are saying.

Falling apples, cows and stones give a damn in baseline craps.

Do you agree ?

Yes, but only because you didn't write what you think you wrote.

So if you don’t believe it, I suggest go to the first floor at Domus Vista, - drop an apple in the head of Hans standing at Ground Floor. . If Hans do not have time to move, - I am right.

If you think, just based on simple life experience, that would happen, you are beyond help.

After finishing this experiment tells me PLEASE where is the damn COG?

It seems to be somewhere between the 10^th and 14^th floors.

Still am talking about systematical measurement we have done, relative to a FAG line, PLEASE stick to that.

You didn't measure anything relative to the FAG.

It is here and now we are talking about, - not year 1960 before the building was build.

Which is a shame because then you could measure the ADG without he building.

To make a long history short, - THERE ARE NO UPWARDS PULL , - in that building (if the FAG standard really is true)

There's no upward pull because the building is on earth, which is really big.

And there is therefore also not detected any COG where you expect it to be.

There is when you remove the earth from the data, which is what you have to do if you measure the building on it's own.

 

[MRC_Hans]

*snipped, idiotic irrelevant scenario*

imaging you are walking through the main door to the Ground Floor at Domus Vista.
You should now expect that the apple would accelerate a little less, -

Do you agree ?

Correct.

BUT what does really happens here?
Mamma Mia the apple is accelerating much too fast, the acceleration is NOT less as the FAG, - the ADG is in fact faster as the FAG.

No. The ADG towards the earth (i.e. down) on the ground floor in the Domus Vista is 0.39 mGal less than it would be if the building was not there. According to your own data.

Try this; - The ADG difference between Ground floor and first floor = 1202 µgal/m

No, it is 1202 µgal. Since the distance between the two floors is 4.3 m, the gradient, which is obviously NOT a free air gradient, is - 279.5 µgal/m

So it is obviously smaller than the FAG, because the building pulls you UP.

This gives you a decrease from the Earth ADG = 1202 µgal/m per 420 cm or = 286 µgal/m.

You can't say µgal/m per cm. I see you use a slightly different elevation. I use the one from the drawing, your measuring stations may be placed differently, but to 10 cm will not make a significant difference.

If you took the trouble to actually learn how to calculate things and how to understand your own data, you could avoid making a fool of yourself.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Bjarne, things with mass attract each other but gravity is very weak. Therefore, a building will make no practical difference to the acceleration of an apple on earth.

Have you considered to be a politician?

Bjarne
And it get worse, - because the further up in that stupid building you climb the faster will the apples ADG hunt you.
THIS IS OBJECTIVE A FACT. – IT WILL HAPPEN LIKE I JUST WROTE – because THIS is what we have measured.
Do you agree ?
Paul
I can't agree as I have no idea what you are saying.

I am saying that according to the inner ADG religion, - you should expect a pull upwards at the lower floor, and largest at the grounds floor. (Exactly like the Moon exert a upwards pull) .
BUT the fact dear….. the objective data proves dear; - THIS DOES NOT HAPPENS.

Instead you have larger DOWNWARDS acceleration at ground floor and all lower floors.
This continues to the top, and hence; THERE IS NO COG in that building…

Bjarne
After finishing this experiment tells me PLEASE where is the damn COG?
Paul
It seems to be somewhere between the 10th and 14th floors.

Nonsense, - of the simple reason that the FAG and ADG curve MUST merge in the COG according to you religion, - IT DOES NOT HAPPEN.

So to work with the gravity of the building alone you need baseline gravity without the building and the elevation of each measurement.

Nonsense, – according to the prevailing religion, - you do only need to follow the measured ADG values, for example from ground floor and upwards,
So long these lower measured values are weaker (weaker ADG) as the FAG, you can easy determinate that you are on the way towards the COG.

So soon the measured values gets stronger you MUST be above the COG.

So soon these value is zero, you must "merge" with the FAG.

Let us know say that the total negative upwards pull = 200 µgal/m…
You can now cow stupid easy add this value to the measured ground floor value and you should have the “baseline”, - which mean how ADG was before the building was build.

It is so cow-stupid easy to determinate a baseline AFTERWARDS.

BUT dear….. on that upwards ADG/path there are no such pattern.
You cannot say that exactly on that floor and that floor, and here and here, / you’ll have upwards pull.
In fact there is not one single spot, where you do have upwards pull in that stupid building....

Translated to cow intelligent logic : Doesn’t matter from which floor in Domus Vista a cow would push you down, - you would NOWHERE accelerate slower (due to the buildings upwards pull) … This is a FACT…

Do you understand; NOWHERE?

Simple because THERE ARE NO UPWARDS PULL ANYWHERE in that building.

THIS is what the data shows.

All this are consequences that follows your own stubborn implicit faith >> FAG is 308,6 µgal/m

So try to reconsider that FAG value and see what happens….
But still it is too late to save a allready dead holy thesis...

 

[Bjarne]

No. The ADG towards the earth (i.e. down) on the ground floor in the Domus Vista is 0.39 mGal less than it would be if the building was not there. According to your own data.

Nonsense.
This is based on free fantasy...

No, it is 1202 µgal. Since the distance between the two floors is 4.3 m, the gradient, which is obviously NOT a free air gradient, is - 279.5 µgal/m
So it is obviously smaller than the FAG, because the building pulls you UP.

If we assume that the FAG really = 308,5 µgal/m and the measured value = 279.5µgal/m (between GF and 1st floor) ("etc")
You do have a difference = 29 µgal/m, - I am sure you agree to that.

The FAG 308,5 µgal/m means that the Earth’s ADG is losing 308,5 µgal/m.
And hence gets weaker with that value for each meter.

I assume you agree that if the value is only 300 µgal/m (or 279.5 µgal/m ) – this must mean that the Earth is losing less gravity per meter. And hence that both a cow and a stone now would fall faster towards the Earth.

That must then mean that if the ADG ……ONLY……. is MINUS 279.5 µgal/m at the ground floor at Domus Vista, - a cow here must simply fall (29 µgal/m) faster to the ground, compared to when it was 308,5 µgal/m

Opposite if the overall ADG inside the building is decreasing 330 µgal/m then the cow MUST fall slower.

Honestly will you really deny that ?

Mother cow still have some free advanced lessons, please consider ?

 

[Paul]

I am saying that according to the inner ADG religion,

You have repeatedly demonstrated that you do not have any idea what the prevailing theory entails.

- you should expect a pull upwards at the lower floor, and largest at the grounds floor

Yes, the big building above you will attract you, but much, much less than the enormous planet below you.

BUT the fact dear….. the objective data proves dear; - THIS DOES NOT HAPPENS.

Which part of your own data do you disagree with?

Instead you have larger DOWNWARDS acceleration at ground floor and all lower floors.

No, in my table, based on your data, the building slows your acceleration until the 12^th floor, after which it increases it.

This continues to the top, and hence; THERE IS NO COG in that building…

As we have shown you several times, you are completely wrong.

Nonsense, - of the simple reason that the FAG and ADG curve MUST merge in the COG according to you religion, - IT DOES NOT HAPPEN.

The centre of gravity of an individual object has nothing to do with any other object: it doesn't matter how far Domus Vista is from the earth, it's centre of gravity will be the same.

Nonsense, – according to the prevailing religion, - you do only need to follow the measured ADG values, for example from ground floor and upwards,

It is obvious from your continued insistence on repeating ignorant statements that you have not even tried to understand what Hans and I have been saying to you.

So long these lower measured values are weaker (weaker ADG) as the FAG, you can easy determinate that you are on the way towards the COG.

How far from the earth do you think you'd have to be before the ADG was reduced to zero?

Let us know say that the total negative upwards pull = 200 µgal/m…
You can now cow stupid easy add this value to the measured ground floor value and you should have the “baseline”, - which mean how ADG was before the building was build.

Really?

The measured ADG on the ground floor of Domus Vista is 981547684 µGal. What was it before the building was there?

It is so cow-stupid easy to determinate a baseline AFTERWARDS.

Excellent, it should present you with no problems then.

Translated to cow intelligent logic : Doesn’t matter from which floor in Domus Vista a cow would push you down, - you would NOWHERE accelerate slower (due to the buildings upwards pull) … This is a FACT…

Unless it pushed you from below the 12^th floor.

Do you understand; NOWHERE?

The question is, why don't you understand.

THIS is what the data shows.

Try looking at the data properly.

All this are consequences that follows your own stubborn implicit faith >> FAG is 308,6 µgal/m

Why do you think everyone else is wrong about the free air correction?

 

[Bjarne]

No, in my table, based on your data, the building slows your acceleration until the 12th floor, after which it increases it.

The data shows a measured ADG value between ground floor and 1st floor = 1202µgal.

The elevation difference = 4,2 Meter – which mean a ADG difference = 286 µgal/m..

This mean if the FAG should be 308 µgal/m, - a cow will fall faster from 1st floor to ground floor at Domus Vista, as it would if you would remove the building.

How much faster can be calculated; 308 µgal/m minus 286 µgal/m = 24 µgal/m.

But honestly Paul I do certainly not expect you or Hans or Co too to understand anything of this.
You know such advanced mathematic (and for example; it is stupid to have Roundup in our ground water), such knowledge are much too complicated for humans, - (but not for cows).

 

[Bjarne]

Let's keep it simple
Let say the Earth ADG = 1000µgal
The FAG per meter = ......300µgal
This mean 1 meter from the Earth ADG = 700µgal - THIS is how fast you will accelerate starting from 1 meter, - in free air.

Let know say you'll measure in 1 meters altitude over a stone, - now you can based on measurement difference at ground floor and 1 meters altitude determinate a ADG difference = 200µgal

So instead of losing 300 µgal the Earth is (with thanks to the stone) is only losing 200 µgal per that meter , right ?
This mean the overall planet ADG (included the stone) 1 meter above the Earth must be 800µgal , - right ?
Therefore; + 100µgal stronger ADG as when you would remove the stone, - right?
So weaker lost of ADG per meter = stronger ADG , right ?

 

[MRC_Hans]

Nonsense.
This is based on free fantasy...

It is based on your own data. If they are free fantasy, .... then it is remarkable that you didn't imagine something that supported your other fantasies.

If we assume that the FAG really = 308,5 µgal/m and the measured value = 279.5µgal/m (between GF and 1st floor) ("etc")
You do have a difference = 29 µgal/m, - I am sure you agree to that.

Yes, I get 29 as well. Congratulations, you can at least subtract two numbers.

The FAG 308,5 µgal/m means that the Earth’s ADG is losing 308,5 µgal/m.
And hence gets weaker with that value for each meter.

I assume you are explaining this to yourself. The rest of us already know it.

I assume you agree that if the value is only 300 µgal/m (or 279.5 µgal/m ) – this must mean that the Earth is losing less gravity per meter. And hence that both a cow and a stone now would fall faster to wards the Earth.

No.

The FAG has no practical influence on how fast something falls. At least not for such small distances. The ADG for Earth is 981550.959 mGal for the Domus Vista area, and this determines how fast a falling object accelerates. It accelerates with 9.81550959 m/s².

When you go in on the ground floor of Domus Vista, the ADG is (as measured by DTU on your own behalf) is 981547.684mgal. So a falling object will accelerate with 9.81547684 m/s².

This is 0.0000039 m/s² less than outside the building.

That must then mean that if the ADG ……ONLY……. is MINUS 279.5 µgal/m at the ground floor at Domus Vista, - a cow here must simply fall (29 µgal/m) faster to the ground, compared to when it was 308,5 µgal/m

Opposite if the overall ADG inside the building is decreasing 330 µgal/m then the cow MUST fall slower.

No, You don't seem to understand this. Think again.

...

Now, so how does it fit that we can calculate a "FAG" inside the building that is lower than outside? Well, that is probably over the heads of the cattle community, but hang on:

As you ascend the stairs, you are under influence of two gravity fields: That of Earth and that of the building. As you ascend, the ADG of Earth becomes lower, because you are moving away from Earths COG. However, at the same time you are moving into the building and closer to its COG, also.

According to the law of gravity, as you move inside a mass, the ADG will fall as you approach the COG, because more and more mass is 'above' you.

So as you move up the lower floors, both Earth's ADG and the building's ADG is deceasing. However, since they pull in opposite direction, the change is less than otherwise.

So, let's move up wards in the building.

When we pass the COG of the building, the ADG of the building pulls in the same direction as that of Earth, but now it is increasing, so it will still reduce the 'FAG'.

This is exactly what Bjarne's graphs show: A decreasing 'FAG' for the lower floors, then it slopes up wards (but still negative) and meets the real FAG at the top of the building. Because Bjarne is plotting the differential values.

Paul and I have calculated and plotted the absolute values of the presumed FAG and the measured ADG per floor against each other, which shows the absolute ADG throughout the building, and which also conforms to the law of gravity as we all know it.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

How much faster can be calculated; 308 µgal/m minus 286 µgal/m = 24 µgal/m.

24 µgal/m is a speed in your universe?


Why are we even trying to explain things to this guy?

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Let's keep it simple
Let say the Earth ADG = 1000µgal
The FAG per meter = ......300µgal
This mean 1 meter from the Earth ADG = 700µgal - THIS is how fast you will accelerate starting from 1 meter, - in free air.

This is not too bad. The values are probably impossible in the real world, but you succeed in subtracting 300 from 1000 and getting the correct result: 700. Congratulations!

Let know say you'll measure in 1 meters altitude over a stone, - now you can based on measurement difference at ground floor and 1 meters altitude determinate a ADG difference = 200µgal

This makes no sense at all. How big is the stone? What is its mass?
If the FAG is -300µgal/m from zero to 1 meter, then if we assume your stone is one m, you will measure one m above it, so this will be in the interval 1m - 2m. This will also be 300µgal/m, except that the function is not really linear, so in such a small field it will probably be less than 300µgal/m.

How much is impossible to say, since we don't know the diameter of your hypothetical 'earth'.

So instead of losing 300 µgal the Earth is (with thanks to the stone) is only losing 200 µgal per that meter , right ?

Wrong.

This mean the overall planet ADG (included the stone) 1 meter above the Earth must be 800µgal , - right ?

Wrong.

Therefore; + 100µgal stronger ADG as when you would remove the stone, - right?

Wrong.

So weaker lost of ADG per meter = stronger ADG , right ?

Wrong.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Try to answer these simple questions.

1.
If the Earth would lose 600µgal per meter would this then mean faster or weaker ADG ?

2.
If the Earth would lose only 100µgal per meter would this then mean faster or weaker ADG ?

3.
If you are under the Moon, and we assume the effect is 0.001µgal , - is the ADG value then a a little more (+0.001µgal) or a little less (-0.001µgal ) relative to the FAG at that spot. (without the Moon hanging up over you)..

4.
If this is too much (too little) for you to imaging, let us replace the Moon with Jupiter orbiting the Earth, - and assume it would pull you 100µgal/m
I know you would say the earth would orbit Jupiter, but let us assume Jupiter was so close it would drag you 100µgal/m at the surface of the Earth

Would the ADG lost of the Earth now under the Big Jupiter now be (approximated) ;

• 208,5 µgal/m
• 308,5 µgal/m - or
• 408,5 µgal/m

Hans if you are a coward, simple just ignore the question, and blap blap blap about something completely different, and just hope I forget to remind you...

 

[MRC_Hans]

Try to answer these simple questions.

1.
If the Earth would lose 600µgal per meter would this then mean faster or weaker ADG ?

2.
If the Earth would lose only 100µgal per meter would this then mean faster or weaker ADG ?

The questions don't make sense. There is no direct connection between the ADG and the FAG.

The ADG on Jupiter is much higher than on Earth, but the FAG is much lower.

On a very small and very dense mass, the ADG may be lower than on Earth, but the FAG higher.

3.
If you are under the Moon, and we assume the effect is 0.001µgal , - is the ADG value then a a little more (+0.001µgal) or a little less (-0.001µgal ) relative to the FAG at that spot. (without the Moon hanging up over you)..

The effect of the moon is MUCH higher. Under the moon, both the ADG and the FAG are lower.

4.
If this is too much (too little) for you to imaging, let us replace the Moon with Jupiter orbiting the Earth, - and assume it would pull you 100µgal/m
I know you would say the earth would orbit Jupiter, but let us assume Jupiter was so close it would drag you 100µgal/m at the surface of the Earth

Bjarne, I'm afraid you are completely mixed up. The pull of a sattelite is not measured in µgal/m, it is measured in µgal.

Would the ADG lost of the Earth now under the Big Jupiter now be (approximated) ;

• 208,5 µgal/m
• 308,5 µgal/m - or
• 408,5 µgal/m

Again, ADG is measured in µgal (or Gal, or mGal)

Hans if you are a coward, simple just ignore the question, and blap blap blap about something completely different, and just hope I forget to remind you...

Bjarne there is nothing you can do that scares me, but if I'm to answer questions, they must make some kind of sense.

Hans

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Hans if you are a coward, simple just ignore the question, and blap blap blap about something completely different, and just hope I forget to remind you...

If your hypothesis for why people avoid answering questions is that it's due to cowardice, does that mean that you've avoided answering the many questions put to you over the last few posts because you're a coward?

 

[Bjarne]

The questions don't make sense. There is no direct connection between the ADG and the FAG.

Of course there is.
If you are standing in free air the “natural” ADG lost of the Earth is at its maximum. For example MINUS 308,5 µgal/m (FAG).

So soon you walk inside Domus Vista you expect the building to pulls you extra upwards, which mean the “lost” of ADG a gravimeter can measure should increase for ensample 25 µgal, whereby the ADG at a certain place would should be decreasing 308,5 µgal/m + for example 25 µgal a certain place, - because the building “should” pull upwards.

BUT the opposite happens in Domus Vista.

The ADG in that building is stronger everywhere, relative to a FAG line, - relative what it would have been without the building. – There is no upwards pull that reinforce the FAG.

THIS IS A FACT.

The rest of you post is exactly as expected, you have not answered one single question.
And if you did you would be force the admit that the data from Domus Vista shows that there are no upwards pull at the lower floors, instead there is increasing ADG doesn’t matter where you are at this building.

Bjarne
Would the ADG lost of the Earth now under the Big Jupiter now be (approximated) ;

• 208,5 µgal/m
• 308,5 µgal/m - or
• 408,5 µgal/m

Hans
Again, ADG is measured in µgal (or Gal, or mGal)

Exactly as expected.
It seems you are afraid even to try to under the question right ?
The question is not how ADG is measured or not, but only how much a Jupiter moon would pull you upwards.

Let us say a gravimeter is standing at a 1 meter table.
Let us say the FAG is measured to exactly MINUS 308,5 µgal per that meter and let us say a planet suddenly would pull it upwards with exactly 100µgal extra.

What would now happen with the next ADG measurement - relative to a measurement at Ground floor, - (relative to the FAG you already know) ?

• Minus 208,5 µgal per that meter
• Minus 308,5 µgal per that meter---or
• Minus 408,5 µgal per that meter

Hans if you are a coward, simple just ignore the question, or just blap blap blap about something completely different, - you know the politician way you always does when you are losing a discussion.

 

[Paul]

The data shows a measured ADG value between ground floor and 1st floor = 1202µgal.

Measured difference.

The elevation difference = 4,2 Meter – which mean a ADG difference = 286 µgal/m..

Well done.

This mean if the FAG should be 308 µgal/m, - a cow will fall faster from 1st floor to ground floor at Domus Vista, as it would if you would remove the building.

No it doesn't, it doesn't even mean that a cow will accelerate faster.

Subtracting 308 µGal per metre lowers the ADG thus the cow will accelerate less.

How much faster can be calculated; 308 µgal/m minus 286 µgal/m = 24 µgal/m.

No it can't.

But honestly Paul I do certainly not expect you or Hans or Co too to understand anything of this.

If you mean we don't understand why you are pretending to work on serious physics when you can't even grasp the basics then yes, you are correct.

You know such advanced mathematic

No, but I can read and count.

(and for example; it is stupid to have Roundup in our ground water)

Then don't put systemic weedkiller into aquifers.



How's that cow simple baseline calculation comming?

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Hans if you are a coward, simple just ignore the question, or just blap blap blap about something completely different, - you know the politician way you always does when you are losing a discussion.

Again, is this why you consistently ignore questions put to you? Or do you hold yourself to different standards to everybody else?

 

[Marcus]

Bjarne there is nothing you can do that scares me, but if I'm to answer questions, they must make some kind of sense.

Hans

Hans, would you mind if I asked you a question?

If one were standing on the Earth, and Jupiter was located directly overhead, at the distance the moon normally occupies, what acceleration would one feel, and in which direction?