psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
That was weak.Yes thank you I totally agree we should move your Bitcoin Simping to the Conspiracy Section.
That was weak.Yes thank you I totally agree we should move your Bitcoin Simping to the Conspiracy Section.
Still a ways to go before it reaches the $69K that it was 2 years ago.it's back at $37k right now, if you got talked into buying some like a dumbass like i did a few years back during that boom, it's probably pretty close to where it was when you bought it. i sat on it and i'm happy to get my money back.
Playing any game can be nerve wracking with crypto.I don't blame you for cashing out while you can avoid a loss. Playing the long game can be quite nerve wracking.
So you are a Puritan who abhors gambling.But the main reason I don't touch crypto is that it's immoral.
Binance Admits It Engaged in Anti-Money Laundering, Unlicensed Money Transmitting, and Sanctions Violations in Largest Corporate Resolution to Include Criminal Charges for an Executive
Binance's CZ resigns as CEO, pleads guilty and agrees to pay $4.3B. Binance will continue operating but will be AML monitored for 3 years.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/binance-and-ceo-plead-guilty-federal-charges-4b-resolution
So you are a Puritan who abhors gambling.
That's fine as long as you don't try to foist that POV on the rest of the world.
WOW. Just WOW.It's too random to be of interest to a serious gambler.
That's the same CZ whose decision not to rescue FTX was the straw that broke that particular camel's back.
I was wondering at the time how long it would take before he was brought down too. Is there anybody in cryptocurrency who isnot as bent as a nine pound notestaying on the right side of the law?
I think FTX would have gone down anyway. If it hadn’t been CZ it would have been something else.It was a combination of CZ's actions that initiated an FTX run on the bank. CZ had also tweeted they were dumping all their FTT tokens and that initiated people pulling out of FTX. SBF ran FTX/Alameda as a combined pot of money even while telling the World customer deposits were segregated when they weren't. I think CZ was fully aware of what SBF was doing and saw an opportunity to take out FTX. FTX was waging a full scale campaign presenting itself as the most honest exchange and no doubt irritating CZ to high heaven.
Quite possible FTX would be alive and kicking without the CZ inspired run. They had a lot of illiquid investments that might have paid well in the future, including a big one in AI.
I think FTX would have gone down anyway. If it hadn’t been CZ it would have been something else.
Not a Puritan, but yes I do abhor the idea of getting 'something for nothing'. Crypto is much worse than that though, it's immoral on so many levels and causes actual harm on a massive scale.So you are a Puritan who abhors gambling.
Selective bias. Speculation and fraud occurs on a much wider global scale with "regular" currencies and is potentially far more damaging. Remember 2008?Crypto is much worse than that though, it's immoral on so many levels and causes actual harm on a massive scale.
Not a Puritan, but yes I do abhor the idea of getting 'something for nothing'. Crypto is much worse than that though, it's immoral on so many levels and causes actual harm on a massive scale.
I am not against gambling per se. It can be a fun experience. A few months ago I attended a 'Home and Garden' show and spied a Ford Mustang Mach-E. Turns out it was the prize in a fundraiser for the local rescue helicopter. NZ$50 for a ticket. I happened to have $50 cash on me so I told them I would buy a ticket if they let me sit in the car. I didn't expect to win even though at that time I was only ticket number 58. And of course I didn't win, but...
Last week I got an email inviting me to attend the draw at the hanger where the helicopter is based, which happens to be only 2 km from where I live! They cleverly held it on a Friday at 11am, so only about a dozen people turned up. With ~5,000 entries the chances of any of us winning was minuscule, and of course none of us won. But...
When the name of the winner was announced, one of the ladies exclaimed that it was her friend! She called her friend up and put the phone on speaker so we could all hear, which was quite funny because at first she thought it was a prank. Then she realized it was real and we heard "Oh my God! I hope there's nobody religious there because I don't know what else to say." - and we all laughed.
So even though none of us won we still participated in the joy of winning. I got to see the rescue helicopter up close, and inside the hangar too which was awesome. I got to sit in a $125,000 car that I could never afford to buy, without having to tell a salesman lies. And we all donated to a good cause (this helicopter was flying 24 hrs a day for weeks during Cyclone Gabrielle, so they really needed the money!). The prize of an electric car was also rather appropriate considering global warming caused the cyclone.
Was all that worth 50 bucks? Hell yeah!
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1476&pictureid=13879[/qimg]
To be honest I didn't even want to win that car, because then I would have to get rid of my Nissan Leaf (which I love). I left the event feeling pumped but also slightly relieved. Winning would have been a lot more stressful, and I would feel guilty because I won and they didn't. 'Luckily' luck was well on my side there.
Not a Puritan, but yes I do abhor the idea of getting 'something for nothing'.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11819729#post11819729Roger Ramjets said:I would if I had any. Bitcoin is in a huge bubble that is about to burst.psionl0 said:Anybody game to short bitcoin yet?![]()