Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mad Hom wrote:
Bigfeetsus's can't be thrown away...they also don't rot and fall apart...


Actually, Mad Hom...just about every animal that's ever existed has rotted away.

You're not too smart...are you? :)
 
Last edited:
And your pictures were taken 5 years later ..

You think the stream bed might have changed at all ?

8 months later, not much. 5 years later, somewhat. 40 years later, very much so. But recent pictures show similar debris.
 
Mad Hom wrote:
Bigfoot Nation want's....THE suit...and all we the skeptical people of earth want....is A Bigfeetsus.

Wrong again...Mad Mouth...

All we are asking is for ANY suit that can closely approach the realism of what we see in the PG film.

No-one can produce a suit which satisfies that request.

Skeptics can laugh-off the film as being weightless as evidence for Bigfoot.....but when faced with re-producing what's in the film....they fail miserably.....and completely.
They can't find a suit anywhere which closely approaches the realism of Patty.

The real laugh is on the skeptics. :D ...Dfoot included.
 
More pages added but nothing worthy presented. Its not a surprise, however, but I just wasted some minutes of my life -that are not coming back- reading the new posts.

Ad infinitum repetition of arguments composed of crap will not turn them in to diamonds...

:s2:
Wake me up if something interesting shows up...
 
More pages added but nothing worthy presented. Its not a surprise, however, but I just wasted some minutes of my life -that are not coming back- reading the new posts.

Ad infinitum repetition of arguments composed of crap will not turn them in to diamonds...

:s2:
Wake me up if something interesting shows up...
What!? You don't find shoveling snow interesting? C'mon, you're from Brazil. It's maaaagical.:D

Well, ok. I guess round 26 of apparently lots of reports> must be real, no exact same suit> must be real, looks like fingers bend> must be real, Patty didn't trip> must be real gets pretty sedating. Right, gimme a pillow. Where's my teddy? There it is. C'mere, MK, ya little nut.

:bearface: :s2:
 
What!? You don't find shoveling snow interesting? C'mon, you're from Brazil. It's maaaagical.:D

Well, ok. I guess round 26 of apparently lots of reports> must be real, no exact same suit> must be real, looks like fingers bend> must be real, Patty didn't trip> must be real gets pretty sedating. Right, gimme a pillow. Where's my teddy? There it is. C'mere, MK, ya little nut.

:bearface: :s2:
Mind you, last week, Southern Brazil. 3 Celsius, one night it went down to zero. I cursed the cold. From there I went directly to Northern Brazil. I longed for the cold... And never saw so many deforestation fires... "How can we sleep while our beds are burning?" Could not stop mumbling that song. Oh, no mapinguaris were around.

On the plane back to Rio, I was reading "The God Delusion", while a lady by my side read "The Secret"...
 
You can pre-order the new MK Davis "documentary" about the PGF on DVD. It's supposed to be released on Sept. 16th, and it's eight bucks cheaper as a pre-release purchase. Unless he has recently changed his mind, Davis postulates that Patty is a primitive relict human being complete with a hair braid held in place with a bone clasp. He even calls it a theory (presumably) because he uses visual evidence in the PGF to support it. Now that sounds pretty nutty. But at the same time, there is no more evidence that Patty is a descendant of Gigantopithecus or anything else for that matter. Anyway, the hair braid looks like a film or enhancement artifact to me and it only shows up in one still frame that Davis worked with. Davis is true to his historic style of using either short animated gifs or stills to support his pareidolia du jour. He finds the stuff that everyone else has missed. When he got to the hair braid with bone clasp, I guess he had to decide if he was seeing an artifact or visual evidence of a primate with humanlike culture. Maybe he flipped a coin and it came up showing Washington's ponytail.

He promised himself that he would take the path the evidence revealed and owed no allegiance to pre-conceived notions or paradigms or group. Yet when he reached his conclusion, the world of Bigfoot research attacked him like a rabid dog.

The Patterson Film: The M.K. Davis Theory
 
Mad Hom wrote:



Actually, Mad Hom...just about every animal that's ever existed has rotted away.

You're not too smart...are you? :)

Typical Douche Bag debate maneuver...single out one part of a statement....and than run off at the piehole about it...SUITS rot away and fall apart waterhead....thrown in with all the other POSSIBILITIES that may have befallen the original suit my point which you so deftly ignored was that finding the original suit is a most probably a sucker bet.

Also I'd add here that replicating Bob H...errrrrr....Patty exactly would be the only thing that would close your fat yapper....and by exactly I mean...film stock,film speed...distance...angle....the exact walk...arms swinging at the exact same moments....head turn at the exact same moment...etc etc.

Deny that if you choose but in so doing you're only lying to yourself.
 
More pages added but nothing worthy presented. Its not a surprise, however, but I just wasted some minutes of my life -that are not coming back- reading the new posts.

Ad infinitum repetition of arguments composed of crap will not turn them in to diamonds...

:s2:
Wake me up if something interesting shows up...

Correa...it's pretty much been this way...for 40 years or so...this is nothing new really...LOL.
 
6d7f3885.jpg
 
"I finally yelled at my husband, because I couldn't hold on to that air conditioner much longer," she said. "It seemed like forever, but I'm sure it was just seconds."

"I just know that if that bear would have prevailed, he would have sold our air conditioner on eBay."

"We cleaned up the blood and stuff from the house," she said today in a telephone interview. "All of us had pretty much blood on us."

"Then later, all of us had pretty much relief in us."
 
Patty was apparently wandering around Bluff Creek for 7 years before Roger showed up with his camera for her screen test...

Peter Byrne:
"We have this picture of a footprint from Bluff Creek in 1960 and it’s a 14 and a half inch footprint. About 6 months ago I was looking at it and I was looking at some pictures of footprints in Dr. Grover Krantz’s book, BIGFOOT PRINTS and this looked very similar to one of them. So I sent it to him and I said "do you think that this is actually the same as one of the footprints in your book?" Now the footprints in his book were photographs of plaster casts of the 1967 filmed creature. He called me and said he was 99% certain that they were identical…and the interesting thing about this is what we have is a footprint made by the creature in that film, - seven years before it was photographed.

They don't make any tracks, though...

Byrne:
We have a theory and it’s speculative only. We have a theory that they hide their tracks. Because there must be quite a few of them up to within reasonable limits but there are so few footprints found, so very few, so we think that …well we think that it’s a possibility that they might know enough to know that the one sign they can leave behind that would lead man to them, a man with a gun perhaps, is footprints and so they don’t make any."

http://www.bigfootencounters.com/films/ancient.htm
 
"…well we think that it’s a possibility that they might know enough to know that the one sign they can leave behind that would lead man to them, a man with a gun perhaps, is footprints and so they don’t make any."


The one sign? What about feces, hair, dead bodies? They must hide those too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom