Sure....their
analysis is top-notch science.
(Actually, it's total garbage.)
I'll take a good close look at LTC's "analysis" as soon as I can.....but in the meantime.....what do
you think of it?
He says that the comparison images I posted are meaningless because the subject's arms are at different points in the arm swing...and that distorts the apparant length of the arm. And, therefore, we can't really tell that Bob's arm is shorter than Patty's arm.
Do you agree with his analysis, Mad Hom?
You say they're doing a SWELL job of making a mockery of the evidence.
Are they doing that with
good scientific analysis.....or
stupidity??
I'm not asking you, or anyone else, to "buy into" anything. I couldn't care less what you or any other skeptic on this board thinks, or believes.
I don't care if you're fascinated...amazed...bored...drunk...or dazed.
All I've said in regards to you....is that your "contribution" to the analysis of the evidence is NONexistent.
Your input to the discussion amounts to nothing more than a brain-dead parroting of the same old question...."where's the proof?"
You know what, Mad Man....when and
if a Bigfoot body is brought in, you'll hear about it on your local news...you don't need to keep ranting on and on and on about "proof" like a pea-brained nutjob.
Until such time (if ever) that there is proof....people who take an interest in the evidence for Bigfoot will continue to analyse it as carefully and as thoroughly as possible, in an attempt to determine it's true weight....while you, and other skeptics, continue to post your meaningless, pointless, mindless babble.
BTW....
when have I asked you, or anyone to "buy into" any of the analysis that I've posted here??
