He'd gotten the goods, and they weren't good enough, for science (despite their "a photo would be good enough" b******t) or for people like you.
Exactly Fudd not good enough for .........Non-Bleevers. If on the other hand Bleeving gives you a warm fuzzy,wuzzy feeling down in your blood pump than yes the PGF is good enough
No, they didn't "buy it". Science was teased a little, but what "they" want is the carcass. They won't spend money on it themselves, they won't bother seeking grants, etc. They want the Roger Pattersons of the world to deliver it to their lecture rooms.
WAAAAAAAHH Science won't look into our ludicrous Bleef WAAAAAAHH!! They won't Bleev in something with only vague,ambiguous evidence WAAAAAAHHH!!
They just don't care enough...WAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!
Cry me a river Fudd
"Take it to the next level."
Kill it. Kill it so Horny can "accept" the situation, and so science has their slab of meat to dissect.
Yeah, right............
No Fudley, kill it so rank and file Bigfoot Fan can stop looking like braying gullible jackasses.
Footers need to stop with the unknown primate hairs,the to easy to fake footprints,the arse impressions,the samurai mumblings,the yodels in the dead of night and most of all STOP insisting that the PGF shows anything other than a guy in silly suit. Just kill us a Hairy Biped already and this whole debate ceases to be.
Until then? Well the beatings will continue until logic improves.
If you think it's so easy, why don't you go give it a try.
In fact, go out there and "catch" a bear (without a guide).
Show us how easy it is.
Those things just aren't on my to do list,nor on my "Need" to do list for that matter. The onus is on Bigfoot Fan to get the goods,not me. It's been 50 years and they have a gigantic pile of not freeking much. They need to stop belaboring the midtarsal break's and compliant gait theories and hit the woods with dartguns or hunting rifles and bring this thing to a close. Although,I would advance the notion that it's not Bigfoots existence thats important to Hairy Biped Fan, no...more importantly it's the thought of Bigfoot's existence that really matters.
Almost zip. Just like mine.
You know why I'm not hunting for them?
Because I don't have the time and the money, nobody is going to give me either, and I know how hard it is to catch a bear, even with all the information and knowledge I have about them.
Same with moose. We have twice as many moose in Alaska as bears. We see moose all the time.
You know what the state success rate for moose hunters in Alaska averages?
Less than 25%.
Now divide those chances by 1,000,000 (that's a guess; it might be 10,000,000 and it might be 100,000,000).
There are your chances.
I've done it. You haven't.
Fudd,you have no idea how many Hairy Bipeds are out there. You're guessing. We are a talking an 8ft 900lb creature that stinks like the shythouse door on a tuna boat. It screams and yells at the top of it's lungs at all hours of the night,talks in drunken samurai,rolls in the mudd for apples and leaves it's footprints from sea to shining sea.
It has been seen in every single state of the continental US. Not to mention Canada,Australia,Tibet (and surrounding environs),Russia,South America, and Eastern Europe...How rare is this thing again?
Like I said you're speculating based on "sighting" patterns. Sightings that are either out and out lies, misidentifications,or hallucinations. Your "Scarce" as frog hair take is basically based on Bullshyte. So spare me the Rocky the squirrel analogies and Hairy Bipeds are rare takes.
Bigfoot is rare for one reason because Bigfoot Fan NEEDS him to be. It helps them maintain the fantasy they've created for themselves.
