LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
Patty shows no sign of any midtarsal break that I can see.
Can someone point me to a frame or clip of PGF that shows this?
Can someone point me to a frame or clip of PGF that shows this?
I find it quite sad when googling to try and find descriptions of ape feet, (in particular to try and find out just how flexible and where the flexion points actually are) to keep finding squatch references and in particular the very same mid-tarsal break info relating to Meldrum. Maybe I need to find some different ways of putting my google querys to avoid them.Did anybody else here try Googling for "midtarsal break" ?
And then try again for <midtarsal break" -meldrum> ?
Conclusion?
People really think they can see the flexible foot in the PGF? Well I suppose it shouldn't surprise me, considering that that is what they need to see to prop up the mid-tarsal break theory. If you consider that "pressure ridges" like that seen in the laverty photo can be produced by a rigid arched human walking barefoot through damp sand (and even when wearing flat bottomed shoes), is the insistance on a mid-tarsal break anything more than an attempt to justify the misclassification of bear tracks? Or an attempt to save face? Anyone who has walked on a beach would recognise that a mid-tarsal break wasn't required to make that print.ltc8k6 quoted said:In the Patterson-Gimlin film, the feet of the film subject correlate with the kinematics inferred from the footprints, in that a midtarsal break is present.
Patty shows no sign of any midtarsal break that I can see.
Can someone point me to a frame or clip of PGF that shows this?
....With that kind of luck... what would they need me for?....
....Huntster (who will likely return, and soon) is also the same religious creduloid who mindlessly follows the dogma of the RCC and believes he has no authority to question the beliefs fed him by the church.....
...As for Lu - well, she lives in NC. Need I say more?....
....Yes, admitted hoaxes are not tolerated in the least. The credibility of the 'hoaxer', like Robo or Dfoot, is forever tarnished. This doesn't seem to happen with other hoaxers like Freeman or Marx, whose contributions are still used as supportive evidence by some in the bigfoot camp.....
Do you not know the difference between a web site and a web page?
Yeah, I'll return from time to time. I just needed a couple of days fishing; for fish.
Looks like you're fishing, too. Too bad it's not for fish.
And, yeah, that's me; the religious "creduloid", who mindfully follows the dogma of the RCC, and knows full well that he has no authority to question the teachings which he has sought from the church.
Sure. Say some more.
Like, what does living in NC have to do with anything?
Where do you live?
Does that say something?
If only Meldrum would realize that and stop inventing all sorts of traits for an as yet imaginary foot....
Seems the same physics arguments have been used with Australopithecines.
Yep. Did to me at first glance too, but note the width and the toe length.