bigfoot is real I have the proof

http://www.forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=71572&page=2
Not even close to the proportions. If this is your view of "accurately", my opinions of the rest of your theories just dropped several notches.

I don't get it JC, why are you saying that this is wrong, you were given ample time to correct these measurements previously?

WGBH said:
Yes when I say that the shoulders were 5 or 6 ft wide. It is a estimate.

I watched this animal stand there for 5 mins. It did not just run by and I got a quick glance. The parts of the animal I saw the best were the back, arms, hands and SHOULDERS. I am very comfortable with the estimate I gave.

WGBH said:
There is no mistaking a bear for what I saw. The area has tons of bears running around, but they are not standing 9 ft tall and walking bipedal.

WGBH said:
Actually, the only similarities between Patty and the animal I saw was the shape of the head. The animal I saw appeared much larger and muscular. It also had wide shoulders and a thinner waist. Like a Swimmers build. Patty looked more barrel chested and thick in the torso.

John, you say you had little interest in Bigfoot at the time. How much is ' a little interest'?
WGBH said:
I hardly knew what Bigfoot was at that time, and really had no interest in it.
 
Seeing as this thread is about Creekfreak and his claims, these questions regarding my encounter are off topic and will not be answered here.

So, can anyone answer my question about the specifics of the photo being discussed in this thread please?
 
Seeing as this thread is about Creekfreak and his claims, these questions regarding my encounter are off topic and will not be answered here.

So, can anyone answer my question about the specifics of the photo being discussed in this thread please?

So, I am supposed to go back and read the opening post, but you have zero responsibility to go back in the thread to see what photo we are talking about, the photo that is much sillier than your claimed 9x6 monster?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3489867#post3489867
 
If you went through the first 20 pages you probably saw this. Look familiar?
 

Attachments

  • thum_79347244d109e9af.jpg
    thum_79347244d109e9af.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 161
Not even close to the proportions. If this is your view of "accurately", my opinions of the rest of your theories just dropped several notches.

JC, is there any possibility that you know you didn't see a Bigfoot, and are just perpetuating the story because you like Bigfootry?
 
If you went through the first 20 pages you probably saw this. Look familiar?

That is not a photo. That is artwork. Creekfreak was claiming he had a photo and he wanted money for people to see it.
 
That is not a photo. That is artwork. Creekfreak was claiming he had a photo and he wanted money for people to see it.
Look up, I linked to the photo for your reference bro-ham.

Forget it, this is easier
2341147cb1791a24e3.jpg
 
Yes, that is a photo I have seen before but I did not know it was Creekfreak's. Thank you.
 
So those are bigfoots waiting to be rescued by firefighters in a helicopter?

I believe he DID say there were other 'family' members there.
And that the Fire fighters saw it too.

He was angry with the Florida F&W because they didn't hire him, after he threatened to go public with the photo proving Bigfoot existed in Florida. He promised confidentiality if they would give him a job.
 
Creekfreak said they were running away from a wildfire. They were headed right for a retirement community on the edge of the swamp. The helicopter pilots were intentionally trying to herd the Bigfoots away from the homes.

I think I got that right.
 
Creekfreak said they were running away from a wildfire. They were headed right for a retirement community on the edge of the swamp. The helicopter pilots were intentionally trying to herd the Bigfoots away from the homes.

I think I got that right.

No, the helicopter was scooping water from the swamp.

Creekfreak said:
We got to a site where the helicopers where scouping water out of the creek to put the fire out . I realized from where we where if any animals where fleeing the fire that would have to pass where we where . I dident have my camara with me so we went back to get it . When we got back I found a good vantage point where I could see anything that came out of the woods . I did not see any animals comeing out of the woods so I disided to take some pictures of the chopers that where flying real close to us . After showing the pics to a freind of mine on the internet she pointed out there was 2 creatures clearly standing in front of one of the helicopters that was hovering .
 
Last edited:
Didn't he later contradict himself by saying the choppers carried no water?

I think he said that after someone pointed out that the helicopter in the picture was the wrong type for that purpose. Seems to me Creek tried to argue that until the other person posted a link to the image on Florida's G&W website that showed the helicopters they actually do use.

Or something. It's hard to remember the details of the jnugle.
 
No, the helicopter was scooping water from the swamp.

And intentionally trying to keep the BFs away from the homes...

Creekfreak said:
Yes LT its all very strange but it makes sence if you see the photo . The bigfoots where more or less connered at the time they could not come across the marsh to whare we where and they could not go back across the creek the fire was on that side . I think the pilots where hovering to hold them back from comeing across the marsh to the houses that where behind me . Lots of old folks liveing in the houses that would not have been a good thing . There was a line of trees in the marsh area that ran down the middle the choper was on the other side of those trees we call them scrub oaks there not big .
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom