AS FOR THE PICTURES:
Unfortunately, many JREF posters have deleted them from their personal hosting, or hosted them on unreliable image hosts during their debut in October 2007, HOWEVER:
The Grand Poobah Prize Winner is: Catbasket, for hosting here on the Randi forums' own servers, rather than some fly-by-night free service like I did! Catbasket's photos are the original photos that were "enhanced" using photoshop by CreekFreak in order to make saleable photos for his very own Bigfoot Hoax:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_343472627505f8b2.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_343472628201c16d.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_3434726290d8b5c1.jpg[/qimg]
You can read Catbasket's original analysis of the doctored photos
here.*
*A footnote on Catbasket's photos: Apparently I was wrong, and instead of tormenting Creekfreak by photoshopping the unaltered photos, we photoshopped the altered photos, pointing out and naming additional "Bigfoots" other than the two he claimed were there, even going so far to put circles and arrows around each one! As far as I recall, the Bigfoots numbered 1 and 6 in the top photo (6 is the obvious badly-shopped one) were the ones that CreekFreak was claiming, and all the other numbered "Bigfoots" were ones that we, the JREF posters, claimed we could see---as an object lesson in paredolia for our good buddy Creek, or possibly just for sport.
The Second Prize, Longevity Medal for the longest-lasting hosted images goes to:
Audiophile, for
Image#7, which was an unedited and unshopped version of the original photo. Unfortunately for y'all I can't get it to display as an image, so you'll have to click through the link to see the image. Try to find the Bigfoots! :rofl
Audiophile's analysis of the photo is located
here. Bravo, Audiophile!
Sthomson, for what I believe is Image #1:
The
image's contrast and brightness was altered by Sthomson, but these are supposed to be the "original, unenhanced" photos provided by CreekFreak. Great Job, Sthomson!
Unfortunately the professional assessment of the original unaltered photos done by PetersCreek is no longer available on his site

It involved 13 of the 14 photos with a detailed analysis of the image in each one. Can't say I blame him; since he was an actual photographer at the time, I imagine he got tired of explaining why he had a gallery of uninspired photos of the Florida swamp starring an occasional helicopter in his online gallery. If any potential clients actually read the analysis that went along with each photo, I'm sure they would have even more questions, none of which would be "How much for a photo shoot?" and "Can we book you for my daughter's wedding?" However, you can still read his written analysis of the photos
here.
Gob bliss Amreica, and keep watching the skis!