bigfoot is real I have the proof

[Locknar]

That is the wrong link. For someone logged into myspace it points to their own blog.

I noticed this as well, but I was being polite didn't mention it *lol* Somehow, seems fitting he'd list the wrong link don't ya think?

 

[Locknar]

At this time no one has proven this photo to be a hoax and you will not prove it to be a hoax becouse it is not .

It depends on which photo you are talking about.

If you are talking the low-res cropped photo, EVERYONE (except you) agrees it is a hoax, a photo that has been significantly altered. The only thing nobody knows is who did it.

If you are talking the hig-res version of the same photo, you are correct in saying it is not a hoax....though it is not a photo of "Bigfoot".

If it is not a bigfoot then what is it thats the question .

This has already been answered; it is branches, shadows, lighting which creates a momentary illusion.

I will keep beleaveing it is becouse that is what it looks like to me and many others .

Your lack of objectivity does not make it so.

All I can do at this point is get back out in the field and try to get some better shots of this creature with a better camara .

If they come into your home to eat your canned beans as you've claimed, why would you need to go "out in the field"?

I may not have proven bigfoot is real ....

No truer words were ever written.

In closing, as Steve Martin use to say - Best Fishes.

 

[PetersCreek]

At this time no one has proven this photo to be a hoax and you will not prove it to be a hoax becouse it is not .

Yet more handwaving without even a hint of evidence.

If it is not a bigfoot then what is it thats the question .

You have consistently demonstrated that you will not entertain any answer to that question that doesn't support your belief.

All I can do at this point is get back out in the field and try to get some better shots of this creature with a better camara .

How about using that night vision video cam you said you had back in Feb 2007? Man, that BFF thread was a painful read.

 

[Creekfreak]

Your going to have to set your drag a lot tighter then that to get this fish I anit biting guys forget it .
If they come into your home to eat your canned beans as you've claimed, why would you need to go "out in the field"?
I live in the field lock my back yard and my home if you could call it that is my lab .
If I could afford it brother I would have every inch of this place monitered .
I just dont have the money if I did the sum bitch would not be able to hide .
How about using that night vision video cam you said you had back in Feb 2007? Man, that BFF thread was a painful read.
Beleave me Ive been giveing that thing a workout its been worth the money I spent on it .
With extra ir ilumination its not bad for spoting but I still havent seen him with it as of yet .
It wouldent do any good anyway if I did spot him with it I dont have anything to hook it to so I can record with it .
I am starting to warm up to the game cam though I got some pics with it last week .
2 of them where to black to see anything then there where 4 taken in the day time that nothing was there but it showed that the tarp on my equipment box had been taken off and then put back nothing there to show what did it .
I never liked the game cam but it took some good shots this time so I am going to buy some more of them 59 bucks for one is not to bad but the flashes suck .
Ok thats it no more research questions class is over if you want to talk bigfoot I am here http://www.myspace.com/wettapobigfoot Sorry about that last link I am new to my space I dident know I had to set up the url

 

[Biscuit]

Is that it? Is this thread dead?

 

[Locknar]

Your going to have to set your drag a lot tighter then that to get this fish I anit biting guys forget it .
If they come into your home to eat your canned beans as you've claimed, why would you need to go "out in the field"?
I live in the field lock my back yard and my home if you could call it that is my lab .
If I could afford it brother I would have every inch of this place monitered .
I just dont have the money if I did the sum bitch would not be able to hide .
How about using that night vision video cam you said you had back in Feb 2007? Man, that BFF thread was a painful read.
Beleave me Ive been giveing that thing a workout its been worth the money I spent on it .
With extra ir ilumination its not bad for spoting but I still havent seen him with it as of yet .
It wouldent do any good anyway if I did spot him with it I dont have anything to hook it to so I can record with it .
I am starting to warm up to the game cam though I got some pics with it last week .
2 of them where to black to see anything then there where 4 taken in the day time that nothing was there but it showed that the tarp on my equipment box had been taken off and then put back nothing there to show what did it .
I never liked the game cam but it took some good shots this time so I am going to buy some more of them 59 bucks for one is not to bad but the flashes suck .
Ok thats it no more research questions class is over if you want to talk bigfoot I am here http://www.myspace.com/wettapobigfoot Sorry about that last link I am new to my space I dident know I had to set up the url

I mean...you've said you feed them bacon, that they come into your home and eat your cans of beans....yet you can't get a pic of any of this?

I just don't see what is so tough here, based on what you've said....cook some bacon, set a can of beans out on your table, and stand back while they come a running. Or, perhaps you have simply over stated this?

As to your night vision video camera....I'm not sure how you can say its been worth the money you spent, since you've not gotten any video of "Bigfoot" with it yet.

As to your "class", I think I'll pass.

 

[erikbeckjord]

I mean...you've said you feed them bacon, that they come into your home and eat your cans of beans....yet you can't get a pic of any of this?

I just don't see what is so tough here, based on what you've said....cook some bacon, set a can of beans out on your table, and stand back while they come a running. Or, perhaps you have simply over stated this?

As to your night vision video camera....I'm not sure how you can say its been worth the money you spent, since you've not gotten any video of "Bigfoot" with it yet.

As to your "class", I think I'll pass.

reply: BF seems to enter some homes, and heads for the fridge.
It also seems to have the mental power to freeze people still and prevent photos.

Of couse, you will not like this.

El Monstro.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Soooo, according to your logic:

Bigfoot somehow developed the technology to travel inbetween dimensions, and
Bigfoot knows how to avoid recording technology, and
Bigfoot managed to these things without working, without a job, without money, and without clothes.

Is that about right?

If so, then Bigfoot must come from a real honey of a dimension and it makes me wonder why Bigfoot would even bother visiting a place where the intelligent life is so fragile that it needs clothes to survive the enviroment, it needs jobs to make money, and it needs a vast social structure in order to develop its technology.

reply: Bigfoot needs no reasons, just as we need no reasons for stomping on on an anthill.

 

[Olowkow]

Wow! I don't believe I just wasted an entire Saturday evening reading this. You all deserve a medal for extracting the photo from his grasp at least.

 

[mikeyx]

yes Brett I was under the impression this is what you where asking for . Folks the creature is visable I can even see it even runing windows 95 . Brett thank you for all your help with this thunder and I have talked and we feel this should be looked at by some more photography experts . No offence to you at least you took the time to give it a chance that is more then most have done . Lt I dont have photo shop on this computer I used a freinds all I did was jack up the blues and the eyes showed . As far as seeing the figure in the original you can plainly see the light reflecting off the side of the head it is there and so is the small one bending over in front of it . Shadows do not have eyes and faces we will get to the bottom of this one way or another . I am not just going to give up just becouse of a few on an internet forum says its a hoax .Just becose you say it is doesnt make it so you can scream hoax tell your blue in the face that still will not make it one .

the only problem with your """analysis""" is that theres nothing in your doctored photo

no payoff, no benefit, move on

 

[mikeyx]

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&pop=1&indicate=1 I will answer any questions you have here

on your terms only? pass...........

 

[Dfoot]

There is no way you can disprove that he doesn't have a Bigfoot... I mean prove that he has not had a Bigfoot... I mean... you cannot prove he does have a Bigfoot... damn you and your illogical logic Kirk! (head explodes)

 

[Drewbot]

I think it was my direct threat of having the thread closed that caused him to relinquish the photos. He wouldn't even have been on here in the first place if he wasn't getting the attention he so desperately needs. The threat of taking that away, though I had no way of enforcing such a measure, was enough to force him to Poop or get off the pot.

(I like to think that this is the case anyway)

 

[davefoc]

I jumped to the end of this thread and then went looking for the link to the pictures.

I never did find the allegedly modified picture that supposedly shows bigfoot, but this is a link to the original pictures hosted on the MABRC web siteL

http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4475&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

The original link is on page 31 of this thread.

Could somebody provide a link to the picture that shows bigfoot that was derived from these pictures?

 

[Cuddles]

I believe that the first link to them was [urk="http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3116115&postcount=1220"]here[/url], which links to here. It's worth reading this thread from there to the end, it's only a few pages and has a good analysis of the photos*. There's also a thread somewhere in the Science subforum, but it mostly just covers the same ground in a little more detail.

*

There's no bigfoot

 

[bruto]

I jumped to the end of this thread and then went looking for the link to the pictures.

I never did find the allegedly modified picture that supposedly shows bigfoot, but this is a link to the original pictures hosted on the MABRC web siteL

http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4475&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

The original link is on page 31 of this thread.

Could somebody provide a link to the picture that shows bigfoot that was derived from these pictures?

In your link, there are a number of photos. The last one, labeled "enhanced" is it. That's it, you say? Yes. That's it. For further clarification, see Cuddles' spoiler.

 

[historian]

Originally Posted by Creekfreak
just a few weeks ago i was siting here and something hit my window with a thud I thought it was a bird hiting the window , But when I went out side to look there was a dead mole laying below my window and it was wet . Its been my experience that moles can not fling there selfs 6 feet high and kill themselfs explane that !!

You remember the saying, "when donkeys can fly", don't you? Apparently, either the Bigfoot was wanting to play catch and lacked a softball, was testing whether your clear glass was in fact invisible, may have thought that your diet needed a little extra protein or was fixing up some dry land sushi and the meal may have gotten away from the chief.

 

[kitakaze]

Whoah... Check this out. Creekfreak Part Deux:

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=14410

The similarities with the freak's run here are uncanny: Footer with atrocious writing who was member at MABRC claims possession of multiple photos of bigfoot but won't show them unless being paid a large sum of money. Someone posts his goofy picture which he claims shows a bigfoot mother and child, he freaks out, threatens to sue and spends many pages defending his silliness.

Here's a preview:

(From '444' on GCBRO (bullet maker).......

THE PICTURE POSTED IS REAL: However, you can not make out dilly squat. Thats because of the way I made it out for them. Now the negative, and picture that I have from the negative, is clear, Like I posted up in a statement above, its going to cost me $785.00 to have it copywrited, Yes I found an attorney in Tulsa, Okla. to do it. Now I wouldn`t spend that much money on a beaver, or skunk or any other animal to fake it out as the real thing I`m so sure about the real picture, that I`m letting M.K. Davis do the honors of checking it, and doing his thing on it. (And by the way M.K. I heard you were gone for a week, but I`ve left 3 messages on your answering macine, so when you get back in town, call me, thanks).

Since one of the trouble makers, said it was a beaver, on another site, I went along with them, but the truth is, it is the real picture, only a very-very bad one. Like I said, I`ve got the good one. I havent tried to defraud anybody, if you all remember I was the one that said I would sue, whoever posted the picture. Their was such a clammer from all the trouble that the trouble makers drummed up, that nobody listened to me.

So now everybody is stuck with a horrible picture, but dont be dismayed, when its done right the orginal will be posted on all the sites. Yes the baby is on the right shoulder of the big black momma bigfoot. You`ll have to take 2x magnifaction to see it. However with such a poor copy, you may not cause it may be blurred. On my original, (M.K.) will be able to tell, I think I see a head of another make bigfoot, hugh eyeguards, and muzzle. I`m just guessing on that part, only M.K. will tale.

 

[Locknar]

Whoah... Check this out. Creekfreak Part Deux:

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=14410

The similarities with the freak's run here are uncanny: Footer with atrocious writing who was member at MABRC claims possession of multiple photos of bigfoot but won't show them unless being paid a large sum of money. Someone posts his goofy picture which he claims shows a bigfoot mother and child, he freaks out, threatens to sue and spends many pages defending his silliness.

Here's a preview:

It's nice to see that Creek is continuing to push the envelop wrt silliness and pandering for money on forum sites.

 

[kitakaze]

It's nice to see that Creek is continuing to push the envelop wrt silliness and pandering for money on forum sites.

That's the natural reaction, to think it's just creekfreak using another handle but seriously it's not. Different photo, Bullet Maker is from Oklahoma and freak is from Florida, and both Bullet Maker and freak were members of the MABRC. Freak did try to use a sock puppet after he got the boot from there but it wasn't Bullet Maker. Also that thread at the BFF was started on March 6th, 2006 (Bullet Maker showed up on the 22nd of the same month) and freak's Bungle in the Jnugle thread started on July 12th, 2006. It really is a crazy coincidence.