bigfoot is real I have the proof

I posted my name not my fathers widows name . I also never said I lived in port st joe so that should have been an indicator he had the worng place . I am Gary Carlsten jr. a low life move anyway you look at it
 
I have nothing to prove to you or any one else.

Then quit claiming the picture is not a hoax.

How does it help anyone for you to come here and say the picture is not a hoax with no intent to support that statement? We have had 25 pages of that from Creekfreak already!
 
After twenty-five pages of this I wish that someone would finally put up or shut up.
 
I live here. Gary is a personal friend of mine and I do have personal knowledge that the photgraphs are not a hoax. I have them all on my computer and I took them right off the camera. I have been to this location and asked "Creek" if I could post the location.


so you're a dupe like goob or the one hoaxing him?
 
Good question Drew, I knew it wouldn't talke long. A short time after talking the photgraphs Creekfreak came to my home and asked me to upload them to my compurter. I viewed them and I could see something but wasn't sure what. What I saw was the small one beside the bush. I then talked to Creekfreak and told him that something was there but was by no means conclusive and he agreed. Later that week I talked to another friend of mine and asked him if he could clean up the photographs so we could get a better look, and he did.

By the way I did talk to him last night and he did give me permission to give his name. His name is John Russo, he is the Art editor for the Panama City News Heareld. After John enhanced the photographs I then saw the larger one behind the small one. At this point I refered back to the orgianl and looked again.

Although you couldn't see the large one clearly you could see the silhouette of it. This leads me to have faith that John did in no way paste something in the photograph.

I am sure you will have a thousand questions from here on and just to let you know I am gong to work in an hour or so. I can not talk at work, that sux, but anyway that's the way it is. I will answer any questions I can. And I will tell you if I don't know the answer you are looking for.
 
Wait a minute, photographs? as in more than one? Or are you refering to the "enhanced" image and the original image?

Creekfreak has said from the start that he took pictures.

No merry go round just the location you asked for . My parents home address has nothing to do with this thread you have nothing to prove by posting it . It was a low life move . yes it is public imformation would you like someone posting your parents address ? Give me your parents name and county and I will post yours for you .

If the bickering over this piece of information - which has now been removed at your correction - continues further, I will ask another moderator (due to my involvement in the thread) to consider setting this thread to moderated status.
 
Why did Gary give the pictures to ThunderFoot in the first place if he never saw the Bigfoots in the swamp? Gary said he never knew he had photographed Bigfoots until TF pointed them out.
 
Neither TF nor CF are going to back up their claims, apparently.

It looks like we will have to depend on JREF members or friends to go down there and try to get a picture from the same spot, since these two can't be bothered.

That is if anyone wants to fool with these clowns anymore...
 
LTC if you have a solution to the problem at hand please tell us. If not then you are part of the problem.
 
The real reason Creek is on this thread is for the attention he gets. He has been banned everywhere else (or forced to resign). We are feeding his need for attention. If we stop he will pack up and leave. I think we should quit posting until he comes clean with us.
 
The story changes yet again.
After showing the pics to a freind of mine on the internet she pointed out there was 2 creatures clearly standing in front of one of the helicopters that was hovering .
... but now it seems Creekfreak passed the pics to Thunderfoot who passed them on to someone else? And still there's no evidence, just anecdotes.

Why do I get the feeling this thread is rapidly heading towards Abandon All Hope?
 
the creatures where pointed out to me by some one I sent them to before I knew they where there . I was telling her about the intresting few days I had starting with a turttle laying its eggs in my garden then ending with the fire .the reason for sending it to her was becouse she had never seen a place that aligators live and the photo with the choper seemed like a good one to post . I made the comment this is the kind of place where you will find aligators and if your luckey a bigfoot . she responded gosh did they get the thing out of there ? I then I looked at the photo more closely then saw what she was refering to . it is common knowlgage that in fact a lot of people have asked where is the bigfoot in the picture and they dont see it untell someones shows it to them . So this was just an over sight on my part I did not see it at first .
 
Last edited:
peter wheres is that agreement ? you may get to see it after all I need to know your real name and any other imformation you can provide me . Web sights that have your work ,back ground, military experience ect...

The agreement is still on my home computer...but somehow, I doubt you're equipped to open a PDF file. Besides that, based on your recent statements and behavior, I have very little confidence that you'll follow through on it or or honor it if you do. After all your hemming, hawing, misstatements, and unreasonable demands, why should I waste any more of my time preparing and sending it when the prospect of it going anywhere appears so low?

A link to my website appears in my profile. My military background is not posted online and I decline to provide you with my DD Form 214 for the reasons indicated above. You're not the only one with questions about identity and intent.

You would have to take into account the lens used in the camara as it has been pointed out different lenes give a different prespective . The angle of the lens to the objects must be looked at also it was pointed at the choper not the bigfoot creatures if it was they would show up better they are in the side of the lens . Therefore the magifacation is different then the chopers . The lens is concave so the center of focus is in the middle of the lens . And of course I am not an expert in photos but I am not stupid I may not have mastered my typing skills but I did pick up on a few things in school

You're right, you're not an expert. In fact, you have practically no clue what you're talking about. Some of the things you most definitely did not pick up on in school are optics, perspective distortion, and photogrammetric theory and methods.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom