That is a compleat fabrication I have not refused anything .
I'll let your posts, and answers/avoidance, stand on its own merit. Can you please direct me to the post that provides the date, the time, the location the photo was taken?
I did list DK as the exception.
I made an offer to this so called PC guy
Yet continue to throw up silly roadblocks and other silly issues to prevent your follow-through
I offered to take a tracker to the location to confirm it is the location I said it was .
Yet will not simply provide that information here; that is to say you refuse to answer the question.
I have given you what the local news paper printed .
That was not in my list of refusals, and is the only instance where you have provided some backing to your claims. There was indeed a fire in the area in mid-April '07 as you contend...that is NOT to say this picture is from then, or from the region you suggest.
I told you I would not use the mans name that did the enhancing unless he says I can .
Which man are you talking about? The one that did the editing (vs the woman you claimed originally), or one of the "experts" that has analyzied your photo.
If the "expert", as such he/she would understand that his/her comments would be subject to peer review. What about the "experts" comments...even without providing a name surly you can provide his/her comments right?
In either case, I assume you have personally contacted whom ever, and they have declined? If so, as you have no backing to your claim, scientifically speaking these events did not happen...nobody edited your pic (except perhaps you), nobody (other then DK which you've named) reviewed you pic.
all this is comeing from people that have been proven to be dishonest . you are the ones trying to pull a scam not me.
To what end? I suppose you have evidence of this?
I am not about to send my photo to someone I dont know it is so unreasonable to ask for the real name of some one you are dealing with ?
This is a moot issue; while I agree you have every right to verfiy whom you are dealing with, the onus is on you to do that and not PetersCreek. You've said you will not hire a lawyer (odd considering how interested you are in protecting your interests...you feel qualified to evaluate a NDA?).
You mention your bar (where you are a bouncer) has software that can verify his identity? Why would a bar have such software...why would a bouncer have access to it....what is the name of this software?
you sound like your trying to hide something what could that be ? Humm that Your this PC guy perhapes ? you sure are defending him alot and that is something I dont see people like you do to offten
If you believe that to be the case, please by all means report as such to the mods for action; I insist.
Of course, maybe I'm DK as I've defended him as well.
The bottom line here Creek, is all ANYONE here is trying to do is verify what you claim to be true. At every turn, your own actions thwart this...which is odd considering your claim to want to "clear your name".
Other then the fire in mid-April '07, can you provide ANYTHING to support ANY of your "claims"?
