bigfoot is real I have the proof

The real reason Creek is on this thread is for the attention he gets. He has been banned everywhere else (or forced to resign). We are feeding his need for attention. If we stop he will pack up and leave. I think we should quit posting until he comes clean with us.
 
can you prove or disprove that the photographs are a hoax?

We've been all over that umpteen times already. Try reading the thread.

We don't have access to the original photos, so we can't say sasquat about them. All we can speak on is the low res crop with CREEKFREAK stamped all over it. It's a hoax.
 
The story changes yet again.

... but now it seems Creekfreak passed the pics to Thunderfoot who passed them on to someone else? And still there's no evidence, just anecdotes.

Why do I get the feeling this thread is rapidly heading towards Abandon All Hope?

Snow, if you have a valid question please ask and I will try to answer.
 
can you prove or disprove that the photographs are a hoax?

Here we go again, read back through the thread. You will see that there has been many attempts to get information from Creek. PetersCreek has offered his services in order to give weight to Creeks claim. He has dodged and danced around sending him anything. Why don't we start by giving PetersCreek the material that he requested?
 
can you prove or disprove that the photographs are a hoax?

Just as soon as creekfreak provides them, I'll let you know.

Try reading the thread. We've been over this umpteen times already.

We are not being allowed to see any of the photos at all, save for a low res crop with CREEKFREAK plastered all over it, which has fake bigfeet in it.

Hmmm...double post. Oh well.
 
Last edited:
I know how to save my money I am not out shooting jeager mister every night .
These two acts are not mutually exclusive.
alcoholic.gif
 
peter wheres is that agreement ? you may get to see it after all I need to know your real name and any other imformation you can provide me . Web sights that have your work ,back ground, military experience ect...

The agreement is still on my home computer...but somehow, I doubt you're equipped to open a PDF file. Besides that, based on your recent statements and behavior, I have very little confidence that you'll follow through on it or or honor it if you do. After all your hemming & hawing, your misstatements, and your unreasonable demands, why should I waste any more of my time preparing and sending it when the prospect of it going anywhere appears so low?

A link to my website appears in my profile. My military background is not posted online and I decline to provide you with my DD Form 214 for the reasons indicated above. You're not the only one with questions about identity and intent.

You would have to take into account the lens used in the camara as it has been pointed out different lenes give a different prespective . The angle of the lens to the objects must be looked at also it was pointed at the choper not the bigfoot creatures if it was they would show up better they are in the side of the lens . Therefore the magifacation is different then the chopers . The lens is concave so the center of focus is in the middle of the lens . And of course I am not an expert in photos but I am not stupid I may not have mastered my typing skills but I did pick up on a few things in school

You're right, you're not an expert. In fact, you have practically no clue what you're talking about. Some of the things you most definitely did not pick up on in school are optics, perspective distortion, and photogrammetric theory and methods.
 
I live here. Gary is a personal friend of mine and I do have personal knowledge that the photgraphs are not a hoax. I have them all on my computer and I took them right off the camera. I have been to this location and asked "Creek" if I could post the location.

Thunderfoot, are you willing to upload the original, non-edited photographs? Or to provide them to an intermediary who will host and upload them?
 
We've been all over that umpteen times already. Try reading the thread.

We don't have access to the original photos, so we can't say sasquat about them. All we can speak on is the low res crop with CREEKFREAK stamped all over it. It's a hoax.
For some one that doesent have squat to say you sure have said a lot . go back to your lab student and let the men hash this out or just be quite for a change .
 
We've been all over that umpteen times already. Try reading the thread.

We don't have access to the original photos, so we can't say sasquat about them. All we can speak on is the low res crop with CREEKFREAK stamped all over it. It's a hoax.
For some one that doesent have squat to say you sure have said a lot . go back to your lab student and let the men hash this out or just be quite for a change .
 
sthomson, ask the man who owns them. I have them but it is not my call to upload them. If creek wants them uploaded I will.
 
Mike, I am sorry if my question was unclear. Do you have the abillity to prove or disprove the photographs are a hoax?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom