bigfoot is real I have the proof

I am a private researcher not a professional I do not claim to be an expert in this field but I am no novice . I have not refused any one anything you are twisting my words this is very common with people like you . Ive seen this many times . All I can say is if PC does not agree then he is not who he says he is . the same goes for z s freind if he is who he says he is then he would be a creadable wittness
 
DW just mentioned that the Copter is on the other side of the brush. From MABRC website.

darkwinglh said:
Now for a description of the picture that was sent to me.

The tail number on the helicopter is partially obscured by the brush between the camera and the helicopter. The helicopter shows exhaust coming out of it, the vegetation is blurred behind where the exhaust is. The open area on the other side of the brushline where the helicopter is at, could be any size, and this helicopter could have enough room to land and take off from there.
Click to expand...
 
Creekfreak said:
I have not refused any one anything you are twisting my words this is very common with people like you . Ive seen this many times . All I can say is if PC does not agree then he is not who he says he is . the same goes for z s freind if he is who he says he is then he would be a creadable wittness
Click to expand...
If you have not refused anyone anything, why the constant avoidance? Consider the following:

- You have refused to post, or allow access to, the unedited high-res photo (except DK)
- You have refused to verify the time and date of the photograph
- You have refused to provide any POC information wrt the witness
- You have refused to provide any POC informatoin as to who edited the photo
- You have refused to provide any POC information or comments from the other "experts" that have viewed your high-res photo
- You have refused to provide the exact location of where this phot was taken

And the list goes on. Quite frankly, you have refused all attempts by anyone to verify anything that you have claimed. You are being intellectually dishonest to claim otherwise.

Of course, if I have any of the above (for exampe), please provide the appropriate reference.

Just more sillyness.
 
Last edited:
I dont think anyone can be sure at this point if the choper was over water or not . I asume it was but I can only say that becouse the creek is on the side of the trees that the choper is on . It could be over land I dont know All I know is a mesurement of the distance from the tree line to the water may give us an idea . You would have to take into account the lens used in the camara as it has been pointed out different lenes give a different prespective . The angle of the lens to the objects must be looked at also it was pointed at the choper not the bigfoot creatures if it was they would show up better they are in the side of the lens . Therefore the magifacation is different then the chopers . The lens is concave so the center of focus is in the middle of the lens . And of course I am not an expert in photos but I am not stupid I may not have mastered my typing skills but I did pick up on a few things in school
 
Creekfreak said:
PC . the photo has been sent to Dark of the mabrc with no agreement being made except it is not to be posted to the public only in there members section and so that it cant be copied . As far as sending it to you that will take a while to happen I will need much more imformation then just an agreement you have sent over the internet . I dont know you there for just an agreement is not going to get it .
Click to expand...


I have a copy of what was posted on mabrc merely right clicking and copy and pasting it. I also have a program called jpegsnoop, and as far as I'm concerned it's all under fair use.

I can also say I have ZERO interest in any attempt to profit from your shennanigans in any way.

But I also read read darkwings additions on the mabrc forum today and it sounds like hes quite dubious in your claims.

Maybe now it boils down to whether you are dupee or duper.
 
LTC8K6 said:
If it is posted, it can be copied.

Darkwing probably gets a pass because he is a believer.
Click to expand...

It's generally held as a norm that noone in the bf community is an expert, as it hasn't been proven to exist thus how can you be an expert in it. Enthusiast is a better term inmho.
 
Locknar said:
Agreed; DK has been exceedingly netural....simply providing info/facts.
Click to expand...

true he has, and I extend him an apology if I came across as saying otherwise. I would rather say that it seems that Creek has done him a fundamental disservice by pulling him into the middle of this.
 
Creekfreak said:
Sorry Dark but your assesment is worng I can see it plain as day even with this moniter you are mistaken my good man . All you have to do is adjust the blues in the photo and the eyes will show up again sorry but you are worng on this one .
Click to expand...
have you not done enough to the guy? He has been E X C E E D I N G L Y polite in his nuetrality in this, you owe him big for that as well as for free analysis of your >>cough<<< evidence in my opinion. i for one am amazed you're still trying to milk this.
 
Creekfreak said:
Sorry Dark but your assesment is worng I can see it plain as day even with this moniter you are mistaken my good man . All you have to do is adjust the blues in the photo and the eyes will show up again sorry but you are worng on this one .
Click to expand...

have you not done enough to the guy? He has been E X C E E D I N G L Y polite in his nuetrality in this, you owe him big for that as well as for free analysis of your >>cough<<< evidence in my opinion. i for one am amazed you're still trying to milk this.
 
I dont think anyone can be sure at this point if the choper was over water or not . I asume it was but I can only say that becouse the creek is on the side of the trees that the choper is on . It could be over land I dont know
Click to expand...

Creek old boy, you already said the helicopters were dipping water out of the creek!

A few monthes ago there was a forest fire not far from my land . Me and a freind of mine went to investigate becouse there was a chance it would come this way . We got to a site where the helicopers where scouping water out of the creek to put the fire out .
Click to expand...
 
kitakaze said:
freak, if you had any decency at all you would admit the fabrication you made. Why can't you stop lying?
Click to expand...

All you need to do is look at his downfall on BFF, he did after all invent the weedwhacker etc?
 
Locknar said:
If you have not refused anyone anything, why the constant avoidance? Consider the following:

- You have refused to post, or allow access to, the unedited high-res photo (except DK)
- You have refused to verify the time and date of the photograph
- You have refused to provide any POC information wrt the witness
- You have refused to provide any POC informatoin as to who edited the photo
- You have refused to provide any POC information or comments from the other "experts" that have viewed your high-res photo
- You have refused to provide the exact location of where this phot was taken

And the list goes on. Quite frankly, you have refused all attempts by anyone to verify anything that you have claimed. You are being intellectually dishonest to claim otherwise.

Of course, if I have any of the above (for exampe), please provide the appropriate reference.

Just more sillyness.
Click to expand...

That is a compleat fabrication I have not refused anything . dark was sent the photos I made an offer to this so called PC guy , I offered to take a tracker to the location to confirm it is the location I said it was . I have given you what the local news paper printed . I told you I would not use the mans name that did the enhancing unless he says I can . all this is comeing from people that have been proven to be dishonest . you are the ones trying to pull a scam not me. You have posted my private emails and PMs this proves you can not be trusted . I am not about to send my photo to someone I dont know it is so unreasonable to ask for the real name of some one you are dealing with ? you sound like your trying to hide something what could that be ? Humm that Your this PC guy perhapes ? you sure are defending him alot and that is something I dont see people like you do to offten
 
Creekfreak said:
It is very clear Dark did not intend to give this a positive reveiw from the start this is evident from this email he sent me before he worked on the pictures .

I have the pics Creek, and will look at them when I get home, don’t want to do this at work. But understand Creek, I will report what I feel I need too, friendship aside, so don’t take it personal if it’s negative on the picture comparison. Just want you to know beforehand that I have to call it like it is.



Darkwing

I admite I made Dark out to be more of an expert then he is . All I can say about his assessement is that at least he was able to open the history on the photos thats a start in the right direction . Someone with more experience will have to look at them there is just to many holes in his review .
Click to expand...

so now you're dismissing your own expert because his findings dont back up your own assertions?

You are a piece of work.
 
Creekfreak said:
That is a compleat fabrication I have not refused anything . dark was sent the photos I made an offer to this so called PC guy , I offered to take a tracker to the location to confirm it is the location I said it was . I have given you what the local news paper printed . I told you I would not use the mans name that did the enhancing unless he says I can . all this is comeing from people that have been proven to be dishonest . you are the ones trying to pull a scam not me. You have posted my private emails and PMs this proves you can not be trusted . I am not about to send my photo to someone I dont know it is so unreasonable to ask for the real name of some one you are dealing with ? you sound like your trying to hide something what could that be ? Humm that Your this PC guy perhapes ? you sure are defending him alot and that is something I dont see people like you do to offten
Click to expand...

you came here looking to make money off this crap, so how exactly are WE trying to scam you, goob?

:jaw-dropp
 
yes they where diping it at one time but noone can say they are at the time of the photo they could be over land . you can argue all you want about rotor wash but unless the mesurments are taken from the trees to the water line with the calculation of the lens preformence then it is not worth persueing . the bank the trees and the marsh grass could have been blocking it from the side I was on . Now we come to the day after photos now that we are talking about rotor wash . The reason Dark claims these are not the same photos in my opinon is becouse of the rotor wash in the trees on my side of the choper . they are moveing there fore the area does not look the same in the photos taken the next day . You must look to the other side of the creek to match up the trees in the photos. Dark must have not realized this I will give him the benefit of the dout .
 
Last edited:
mike after I was given a warning from the mods about 700 posts ago there has not been an attemt to sale this photo go back and read that goes for you to Lt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom