bigfoot is real I have the proof

[LTC8K6]

Creekfreak will only agree to sell the photo as is, with no guarantees as to what it shows.

 

[firecoins]

Bigfoot exists. How do you explain George Bush?

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Bigfoot exists. How do you explain George Bush?

PET -- Pedal Enhancement Technology

 

[PetersCreek]

post the agreement and we will go from there . I dont have a fax here but I have acesses to one if it is agreeable to me I will fax it to you so you can sign it and fax it back . go ahead and post it here for all to see we dont want anyone saying we are witholding anything .

I'll work on that later this evening when I'm back at my home PC where I have boilerplate for those documents. If you would, please PM me your legal name as you will sign it, so I can incorporate it into the license agreement. Otherwise, I'll leave a blank space(s) for you to hand-write that.

 

[AudioFreak]

It nauseates me that this thread has another page every time I check on it...

 

[mikeyx]

lock I consider Dark to be the leading expert in this field . And yes they need to be protected we are depleating there enviroment at an alarming rate . If we distroy there food supply then they will have to go some where to eat and that will most likely be someones house I dont think we need bigfoots raiding people friges .

Neither dark or the mabrc seem worth much if they're defending a scam, and a crappy scam at that like yours

 

[Metullus]

Creekfreak will only agree to sell the photo as is, with no guarantees as to what it shows.

I am not concerned with what it shows, per se, only with whether it was represented as being unadulterated prior to the sale and discovering, after the sale, that it had, in fact been altered.

 

[Creekfreak]

Gary carlsten folks I think I may have got bit by a spider I am not feeling well Ill
play when I feel better

 

[Dale]

Creek, I have a question for you. When you BF guys refer to multiples of your creature is it bigfoots or bigfeet? I'm assuming bigfoot is the singular so bigfoots would probably be correct. What say you?
Also, I think we should assign some term to a group of them. For example we have a gaggle of geese, a murder of crows, a skulk of foxes, a sleuth of bears, a shrewdness of apes, etc. How about a binge of bigfoots (or bigfeet). Anyone care to help on this one? I'd like to keep the alliteration going if possible. Cheers, D

 

[B.S]

I've got a picture of a Bigfoot ... he was so far away I had to highly magnify the picture to see him. I asked him how much he wanted me to sell his picture for, but he hasn't got back to me on that yet.

 

[Hellbound]

I have a bigfoot picture, too. A lot of them, and some video.

But I can't post it.

Really, I do. You see, Bigfoot and I were dating (she's actually quite nice once you get past the hair). We were really into each other, you know? But things had gotten a bit stale in the romantic department. So, you see, we thought maybe some photos and videos we made would help add the spice back.

Of course, later things went south, and we weren't on the best of terms when we split. Last I heard she had gotten laser hair removal and went into politics. But anyway, I can't show the pics because the restraining order specifically prohibits me.

 

[Normal Dude]

I have a bigfoot picture, too. A lot of them, and some video.

But I can't post it.

Really, I do. You see, Bigfoot and I were dating (she's actually quite nice once you get past the hair).

But what about the dingleberries? That would put me off.

 

[Hellbound]

But what about the dingleberries? That would put me off.

You can work wonders with a bottle of Hartz(TM) Flea Shampoo and a hot bath.

 

[Drewbot]

Neither dark or the mabrc seem worth much if they're defending a scam, and a crappy scam at that like yours

While Darkwing and The MABRC are bigfoot proponents, I don't think they are defending a scam, in fact I think they called this photo what it is, a scam. If you want to argue the bigfoot belief/nonbelief issue with DW and MABRC that's fine, but don't say they are defending a scam, that is an outright lie.

When they were unsatisfied with the photo and the creekfreak plug for money, they asked him to resign, and called the photo a fake.
http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4425&hilit=

It is now posted here for the public to view, and come to their own conclusions. In no way, does MABRC endorse this picture or it's authenticity, because in all honesty, we have not been able to authenticate it because of the lack of information coming from Creek on the above list of requested information.

 

[Drewbot]

ETA: isn't this pretty close?

It's close, but look at http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4425&hilit= this picture again.

The rear of the helicopter is cut off, there is no tail, Is it possible the helicopter was photochopped into the photo?

 

[LTC8K6]

The rear of the helicopter is cut off, there is no tail

I disagree. The tail is there, it's just shiny green and hard to distinguish.

The copters are identical, imo.

 

[Correa Neto]

Darkwing and the MABRC are not defending Creekfreak's photo. However, I also don't see at Darkwing's posts, here or at the thread at MABRC forum, any specific sentence where he says its a scam*. His position seems to be of neutrality, he merely stated the facts (required data not provided, authenticity can't be confirmed). Other posters at that thread said its a hoax. Thus, MABRC does not seem to be defending or promoting Creekfreak's photo subject as being a real bigfoot.

Given Creekfreak attitudes,
-Not providing the required information;
-Extorsion attempt to the State of Florida -check this post for details-> http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3103557&postcount=631);
and the following facts:
-Creekfreak admits the pic was altered;
-Pareidolia is a good explanation for the figure, with or without "enhancements,"
I personally don't think neutrality is a good position. By default, such position could be adopted, specially if one is a proponent. However, I think this may be much closer to wishfull-thinking gullibillity than to the benefit of doubt. The default position, I think, in this case should be "Its not a bigfoot. Its either a hoax or pareidolia, eventually a combination of both." If someone wants to give Creekfreak the benefit of the doubt, the sentence must be changed to "Quite possibly this is not a bigfoot. Its either a hoax or pareidolia, eventually a combination of both." That's the best he can get.

The way I see it, even if Creekfreak eventually manages to take a 14Mpixels überdetailed crisp photo of a real bigfoot, his attitudes will make people become highly suspicious of it. Too bad for him, too bad for bigfoot proponents.

*I have not looked at other threads there, thus there may be one or more posts where Darkwing says its a fraud.

 

[mikeyx]

While Darkwing and The MABRC are bigfoot proponents, I don't think they are defending a scam, in fact I think they called this photo what it is, a scam. If you want to argue the bigfoot belief/nonbelief issue with DW and MABRC that's fine, but don't say they are defending a scam, that is an outright lie.

When they were unsatisfied with the photo and the creekfreak plug for money, they asked him to resign, and called the photo a fake.
http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4425&hilit=

Okay fair enough, but I still think it in poor judgement to even give that a place for an audience given it's obvious questionable nature.

 

[Drewbot]

OK- that's the chopper LTC. I was fooled by some paredolia. It is reflection off of the green paint.

 

[fagin]

Wouldn't a helicopter hovering that low be blowing the grass and trees about a lot?
No movement I can see in pic.
Maybe the bigfeet are real and the helicopter is really an invisible psychic, which is why it had to be photoshopped in.