bigfoot is real I have the proof

From my point of veiw hist I have not been cornnered . I am the one holding the original sd card not them . They can sling all the insults they care to thats ok it will be them eating there words not me in the end . It must keep them up all night thinking of ways to trip me up but they cant . When you tell the truth you dont have anything to worry about . These people are the ones lieing not me brother .I guess your right though in a way you cant win at internet . I think I will go to fox news with it then they can all say that they had a brush with greatness .
 
From one creek to another as it were...

Creekfreak...if you're serious about presenting your photo as the real deal, how about allowing me to evaluate it? Although I am neither paid nor credentialed as an expert in photographic analysis, I believe I do have experience and skills that would prove useful to this discussion.

I've practiced photography seriously since 1981, using techniques ranging from film & darkroom to digital & computer. I have extensive experience with various image editing programs, including Photoshop up to version CS2. I am a member of the National Association of Photoshop Professionals. Additionally, I have 12 years of experience in maintaining, calibrating, and operating tactical airborne imaging systems operating in the visible and near-IR spectra as well as the visible low-light-level regime, with some additional but limited experience with airborne combat film cameras. So, I feel confident in saying that I have better-than-lay-experience in the critical evaluation of imagery.

To assure you and the forum of fairness, I propose to document my methodology and rationale leading to any conclusion(s) I reach so that it's fully subject to critique, challenge, and correction, as appropriate. Being a photographer who's had his own copyright violated, I'm sensitive to concerns about protecting one's intellectual property. Toward that end, I'm willing to sign an industry standard licensing agreement reasonably limiting my fair use of the photo to this evaluation, in this forum, with no further reproduction authorized.

In order to evaluate your photo by this standard of fairness, I ask you for the following:

1. An unaltered copy of the original image. By unaltered, I mean the image must be in the full-resolution format, with complete EXIF data intact, as produced by and downloaded from your camera without any subsequent adjustments, editing, additions, deletions, compression, or any other changes that would affect the image or its embedded EXIF data as originally captured. This definition excludes any automatic changes unavoidably made to the EXIF data by the act of copying the original image. In addition to offering the maximum amount of visual information on which to base a fair evaluation, providing this file would also serve to render moot, any questions about your friend's color adjustments to the image posted.

2. An unaltered (as defined above) control image from the same camera, depicting the same (ideally) or similar scene under approximately the same lighting conditions.

3. The make and model of the camera used to take the photo and any attachments/accessories (including filters) used at the time the image was captured.

4. The location where the photo was taken, identified as exactly as you're able, including the direction you were facing, if known.

5. Any other information relevant to the photo and the conditions under which it was made. This may include but is not limited to: was the camera handheld or supported by a tripod; was the photographer afoot or in a moving vehicle; presence/intensity of wind experienced by the photographer, whether natural or produced by the aircraft; etc.

The ball's in your court.
 
Drewbot said:
Here's the thing about the chopper.

1. It's not a Huey
2. It's not a Chinook
3. The FL division of Forestry only maintains two Helicopters, one is a Huey, and one is a Chinook.
Click to expand...

I'm willing to give creek the benefit of the doubt here. There are many local fire departments with choppers since the area is prone to wildfire. The one in creek's pic is so sparsely emblazoned with emblems and snazzy paint that it almost screams "local fire department".

But, we know the area - we should be able to find pics of the local fire department choppers online to verify.

ETA: isn't this pretty close?
 
Last edited:
Locknar said:
The man/woman issue is really for you and Darkwing to resolve; I am simply pointing out the inconsistency.

Darkwing, Creek says you got it wrong....the woman that was the witness was not the one that did the enhancing. Can you please clarify?
Click to expand...

Sorry about my absence Locknar, too many irons in the fire.

I am going to have to go through the e-mails associated with all this to see what Creek originally told me on that. But all the posts associated with this pic on the MABRC forum, I always mentioned the woman that enhanced it and no one ever corrected me. Give a day or two to go through the e-mails.
 
madurobob said:
I'm willing to give creek the benefit of the doubt here. There are many local fire departments with choppers since the area is prone to wildfire. The one in creek's pic is so sparsely emblazoned with emblems and snazzy paint that it almost screams "local fire department".

But, we know the area - we should be able to find pics of the local fire department choppers online to verify.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm also willing to concede that there was a fire, that there were helicopters, and Creek might have gotten photos of them fighting the fire. That in itself is not an extraordinary claim. The claim doesn't become extraordinary until we start talking about Bigfoot being there too.
 
That sounds fair . The only problem is logistics at this time . I have allready taken more pictures of the same place as the photo was taken within the 24 hour time frame from when I took the photo . I did know at the time that would be needed . Right now I am going to have to give this some thought . This could be worth a lot of money so I have to make sure I make the right move the first time or I could loose that chance . And of course there is a trust factor I dont know you . I would be willing to send it to darkwing at the mabrc and you both could work on it . I think I owe that to him for draging him down to this gutter . Contact him and see if you can work something out so you can both work on it and I will release it to him only
 
Been wildly clicking through this thread, looking for the photograph, but couldn't find any. Did I miss it? (Serious question, no sarcasm.)

Creekfreak said:
... btw this was my second encounter the first one was with a young one that stumbled into my tent about 12 years ago .
Click to expand...

I've had similar hallucinations and dreams at holiday camp when I was an adolescent.
 
Creekfreak said:
This could be worth a lot of money so I have to make sure I make the right move the first time or I could loose that chance .
Click to expand...

You keep saying this, but it doesn't make any sense. PeterCreek can't turn around and sell this, because there's tons of documentation that shows you own rights to this photo. You've already given plenty of details about your location, so the picture won't cause any more concerns in that regard. Furthermore, if PeterCreek can give a detailed explanation as to why he thinks its real, then you stand to gain enormous sums of money - every newspaper in the world will be knocking on your door.

Unless, that is, you think it's a fake.
 
OK, I think I have the exact helicopter in the pic here and we know the date of the fire. I wonder what the pilots will say if I ask them if they saw a bigfoot that day?
 
darkwing said:
Sorry about my absence Locknar, too many irons in the fire.

I am going to have to go through the e-mails associated with all this to see what Creek originally told me on that. But all the posts associated with this pic on the MABRC forum, I always mentioned the woman that enhanced it and no one ever corrected me. Give a day or two to go through the e-mails.
Click to expand...

No..now now now! *haha*

Not a problem; granted it is not a major issue...but one that needs to be resolved. The above attempt at humor aside, I appreciate your taking the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom