There was fire and you can bet your ass there is some kind record of it somewhere there are probley 500 people that live in the genaral area and i am pretty sure they all knew about it .
Note, I've not said there was not....simply that there is no evidence to support the claim. As such, scientifically speaking without proof/documentation, it didn't happen.
If not they are liveing under a rock .i dont think the state would bring out the choppers and not add up the bill so they could charge the person that started it . And of course all the fire deptments in the area where there too . Do you want me to go to every firefighter that was there and get there sworn statement that there was a fire ? I can do it if need be but your just going to have to take my word there was a fire and this is the out come of it .
I don't need or want sworn statements; simply any documentation that supports the claim you've made about a major fire on April 16, 2007. There must be on-line newspapers in your area, TV station web pages, etc. that would mention this event.
Scientifically speaking, your word alone is not good enough; you need supporting documentation.
I am geting tired of defending myself I really dont owe you people any explanation for anything .
True enough, though note in your OP you were the one that made the bold claim about having proof. Surly you understood, as part of the scientific process, this would open you to questions.
If this question/answer process is to much effort, simply withdraw the claims. Scientifically speaking it is not about "defending", it is about establishing documented fact...nothing personal, nothing more.
The photo is real get the experts on it . I cant help it you are not versed in photoshop enough to find the history thats your problem not mine.
This is a moot issue, on at least two counts. Picture edit "history" can be removed/deleted via any number of means. The picture on the MABRC site has no edit history, it is a flat "as is" file. Secondly, to make any comparison someone would need the unedited original, which you are unwilling to provide.
I'd have to ask...why? Surly you can crop the photo, similar to the MABRC picture, but a bit smaller to cut out Shinny Eyes from the left shoulder on? This would allow for analysis between the two pictures, in terms of explaining other artifacts that appear in the photo on MABRC...and would protect your interests as the cropped originial would not contain any actual Bigfoot image.
what i have presented to you is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God with my hand on a bible .
Truth is a matter of individual perception; facts stand on their own merit.