Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahhh the Bigfoot whisperer....comedy gold!!

Maybe she is on a migratory path as well!?!
 
Last edited:
They're a comical breed, these footies:
Sasnutty said:
The only ones that ever played jokes on me were the ones that were the friendliest & that I liked the most. A few times they even helped me play some jokes on Hubby when he really needed it.
Click to expand...
 
OK STOP!!!
The NAWAC has released a 'Monograph' of the ongoing stuff at AREA X

I have been laughing for a 1/2 hour looking at the photos.

It is done like a scientific paper, but has things like one of the guys holding up a rock, and the caption says '...holding up the rock for scale' instead of putting a tape measure next to it.

And a three sketch drawing of what a baby Bigfoot climbing down a tree looks like. (As if the sketch were done by a 3 year old)

It really is rich.
http://media.texasbigfoot.com/OP_paper_media/OuachitaProjectMonograph_Version1.0_030315.pdf

The possibility of an unlisted anthropoid species indigenous to the Ouachita Mountain
Ecoregion was investigated on a protracted basis by the North American Wood Ape
Conservancy (NAWAC). Surveys ranging from 60 to 120 uninterrupted days were
conducted during the 2011-2014 field seasons in an area with a history of reported sightings
of large ape-like wild animals. Observations recorded by NAWAC teams are described and
discussed in this paper.
Click to expand...
 
^Wow, 229 pages of nut-crushing BLAARGing goodness! You know what would be more interesting? A 1-page paper in Science titled something like "We found a bigfoot and here it is."

BTW, the "blood splatters" on the rocks? Those are not woodrat urine because . . ?
 
While bathing in the creek, Alton Higgins documented another example of faux speech:

14:40 – The men arrived at the crossing and Colyer parked his truck. At Lawrence’s
suggestion, Colyer left his firearms in the truck. Colyer told Lawrence that he did not feel comfortable doing so, to which Lawrence replied, "Nobody's ever had encounters
while bathing in the creek." After Colyer gave Lawrence a look of insecurity,
Lawrence grabbed his pump shotgun and his sidearm. The men then proceeded to
walk down the creek to the area where they were to bathe. As the men began to
prepare to enter the cold creek waters, they were alarmed when they heard running
footfalls and then thrashing about in the dense vegetation across the creek from them.
Colyer looked at Lawrence and retorted, "You were saying, Travis?"
Click to expand...

Forget the hilarity of the story itself, but it's almost like Lawrence didn't want Colyer to have guns down by the creek. I wonder why...
 
Drewbot said:
OK STOP!!!
The NAWAC has released a 'Monograph' of the ongoing stuff at AREA X
Click to expand...
Investigated "on a protracted basis?"
"Field seasons" - is this a thing?
60 to 120 "uninterrupted" days? - ugh.
"Ape-like wild animals" - duh?

That is some awful writing.
 
Drewbot said:
OK STOP!!!
The NAWAC has released a 'Monograph' of the ongoing stuff at AREA X

I have been laughing for a 1/2 hour looking at the photos.

It is done like a scientific paper, but has things like one of the guys holding up a rock, and the caption says '...holding up the rock for scale' instead of putting a tape measure next to it.

And a three sketch drawing of what a baby Bigfoot climbing down a tree looks like. (As if the sketch were done by a 3 year old)

It really is rich.
http://media.texasbigfoot.com/OP_paper_media/OuachitaProjectMonograph_Version1.0_030315.pdf
Click to expand...

Boy, that was convincing! All those photos of their varied and relatively sophisticated equipment...but no photos of Bigfoot for some reason. But lots of photos of rocks and trees. And sketches.

A Zen-type question: if a tree falls in the forrest, must it have been a sign of Bigfoot?

I was impressed by the "blood splattered rocks" however. This is just the type of sample that would allow DNA analysis, so given the efforts and money already committed to the expedition, then I expect to read about the proof by DNA sequencing of an unknown, North American primate any day now.
 
Don't you release a monograph when your nonsense scholarship doesn't find a publisher?
 
How about the sketch of the Bigfoot in the Crosshairs of some guy's rifle, which omits the 1/4" branch that deflected the round.

They were THIS close to killing a Bigfoot.
 
Giordano said:
I was impressed by the "blood splattered rocks" however. This is just the type of sample that would allow DNA analysis, so given the efforts and money already committed to the expedition, then I expect to read about the proof by DNA sequencing of an unknown, North American primate any day now.
Click to expand...

Ah, but since they didn't see whether it was Bigfoot that left the blood behind then it may not have been Bigfoot so they won't get it tested, so that it might still be Bigfoot blood...or something.

Did I get the logic right?
 
When reading the various campfire stories anecdotes encounter reports, one is struck by how often the claimants researchers claim report a clear view of their subject matter, from juvenile, to Bright Eyes to Old Grey. This specificity casts doubt upon the hypothesis that the goofballs observers are being actively hoaxed.

Which leaves very few alternative scenarios.
 
Sasfooty's claims range from a photo of bigfoot looking in a 2nd story window, bigfoot smoking in her backyard, and Bigfoot wearing a cougar cap with cape.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom