Bigfoot DNA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Check and mate.

Any shred of respect you may have had here is now gone.
The next time you start posting on a site make sure you understand what that site is about and who your audience is.
 
LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha
 
OntarioSquatch said:
^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect
Click to expand...

If bigfoot killed a dog, bigfoot DNA would be all over the dog's body.

You seem very interested in bigfoot DNA.

There would also be bigfoot hairs all over the place.

If the dog scratched bigfoot, as it surely would, there'd be bigfoot tissue under the dog's nails.

The dog also likely got in a bite or two, drawing bigfoot blood.

But don't take it seriously, or anything...

Just claim bigfoot killed the dog and move on...
 
OntarioSquatch said:
LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely.
Click to expand...
You clearly freaking don't since you absolutely refuse to back up any of your claims with evidence.


Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha
Click to expand...

Most here think Leroy is a kook or eccentric to one degree or another. Mocking him isn't some nail in the afigbootist coffin. You fail. Again.
 
Last edited:
Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project

OntarioSquatch said:
^I know some people have been sending in samples. I don't know which ones, but hopefully the right ones. I think they're also looking at cases of human/sasquatch hybridization.
Click to expand...

Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received?

Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching...
 
@night walker I honestly don't know. If you join bigfootforums, there are people who will be able to answer these questions better than I can.
 
Night Walker said:
Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received?

Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching...
Click to expand...
You are also the same.
 
Imagine the skunk in the irrigation tube scenario, why would a predator of such legend have to resort to such potentially hazardous prey? Maybe Foots remembers some herbal remedy from it's civilized past that deodorizes skunk stank or something.
 
dafydd said:
I doubt that very much.
Click to expand...

thats okay, they say the same thing about this place and both have some funny and ironic points.

There: operate on the presumption the creature exists and can border on cultish belief in certain circles.

Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.
 
mikeyx said:
thats okay, they say the same thing about this place and both have some funny and ironic points.

There: operate on the presumption the creature exists and can border on cultish belief in certain circles.

Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.
Click to expand...

Do you have a specific example of Bigfoot evidence you'd like to see considered?
 
mikeyx said:
Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.
Click to expand...

What evidence are we supposed to consider?

"Look I saw a bigfoot"

We can't do much with that.

"Look I got me a DNA sample. It's a match to humans. Told you bigfoot was real"

"Look here at this awful footage I got. Just pretend it ain't all shakin' about. And it's clear. And in focus. And isn't just a shadow."

"We've got us a self proclaimed expert. You can tell they're good cause the word pro is in the word proclaimed. He tells me bigfoot's real. You can trust him. He ain't ever lied. Except when he did. Lot's of times actually... But we're going to ignore those times out of convenience."

"Here's some bigfoot footprints. You can tell bigfoot made them because they're bigfoot footprints. It's right there in the name"

Do you have something that isn't this? I would like to see it.
 
I think all of Bigfootry has signed the Ketchum NDA (non-disclosure agreement), they have all agreed not to disclose any example of actual Bigfoot evidence.
 
I am Bigfoot said:
What evidence are we supposed to consider?

"Look I saw a bigfoot"

We can't do much with that.

"Look I got me a DNA sample. It's a match to humans. Told you bigfoot was real"

"Look here at this awful footage I got. Just pretend it ain't all shakin' about. And it's clear. And in focus. And isn't just a shadow."

"We've got us a self proclaimed expert. You can tell they're good cause the word pro is in the word proclaimed. He tells me bigfoot's real. You can trust him. He ain't ever lied. Except when he did. Lot's of times actually... But we're going to ignore those times out of convenience."

"Here's some bigfoot footprints. You can tell bigfoot made them because they're bigfoot footprints. It's right there in the name"

Do you have something that isn't this? I would like to see it.
Click to expand...

you're yelling at me for the wrong thing the debunking argument was much more generalized than just the monkey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom