Bigfoot DNA

Status
Not open for further replies.
^I know some people have been sending in samples. I don't know which ones, but hopefully the right ones. I think they're also looking at cases of human/sasquatch hybridization.
 
^I know some people have been sending in samples. I don't know which ones, but hopefully the right ones. I think they're also looking at cases of human/sasquatch hybridization.

If as you have posited in the past, Footie is a feral human, how do you imagine dna samples will be helpful identifying hybridization?

Or or they not feral again?

Or is there a specimen?

What?
 
Well, if scientists can identify non-African Americans are about 4% neanderthal, then a man like Bryan Sykes should have no problem figuring out hybridization.
 
Well, if scientists can identify non-African Americans are about 4% neanderthal, then a man like Bryan Sykes should have no problem figuring out hybridization.

What does this have to do with my question? Hybridization with what?

More precisely, hybridization between what?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
^lol. For sure

Bigfoot is supposedly one of the extinct hominids that has survived somehow. It could be neanderthal, I don't know. Dr. Ketchum knows. It will be interesting to see which one it is that grew 8 feet tall and remained hairy.
 
itll answer a lot of big questions...

like-
how did they develop glowing red eyes?
with a mid tarsal break (missing leverage) how are they able to run so fast on 2 legs?
do they do it doggy style?
do they have back problems?
are there midget bigfootses?
will they dominate the UFC, NFL and NBA (since theyre humans now), and will the Olympic committee allow countries to field bigfootses against countries that dont have bigfootses?
will they be allowed to serve in the military?
do they support gay marriage? and will there be Squatch's night at the local bars (gay or straight).

many important questions need to be put to rest.
 
OS, do you not know what a hybrid is? A human can't hybridize with a human, that is called just breeding. If BF is a feral human, it can't hybridize with a human. Now you have to tell us all where a feral human got a mid tarsal break, lack of tool use (which would have been a very important attribute to a human living out in the elements), huge size, and open gorilla like nostrils.
 
@ VoodoosixYour right, it wouldn't be hybridization, it would be interbreeding, but they won't know that until they analyse it like Dr. Ketchum.

I think their speed is mostly a result of their phenomenal strength and stride length. They are known to run on their hands and feet as well, which isn't easy for normal humans to do.
 
Yeah, right.
Can you imagine Patty in 4x4 mode?:boggled:


You just keep stepping in it and don't seem to care.
Do you know what kind of internet personality behaves that way?
 
Last edited:
I think their speed is mostly a result of their phenomenal strength and stride length.

relying on brute strength (no matter how phenomenal) for propulsion is inefficient and unadvantageous, we are better equipped to walk upright than this thing described as a sasquatch... but were supposed to believe at the same time that these things are fuzzy forest ninjas who move with cat like stealth & agility and have sustained their population for eons.

there are so many contradictions in the descriptions and sighting reports that there is no way people are reporting the same type of thing. look at "Patty", were supposed to believe that's a skwatch but now were told theyre feral humans... the thing in the video is not a feral human.

we cant even come up with a coherent description of what is even being discussed if we take what is being offered as evidence into consideration.
 
I think their speed is mostly a result of their phenomenal strength and stride length. They are known to run on their hands and feet as well, which isn't easy for normal humans to do.
Watch the Olympics.
The fastest runners in the world aren't covered in bulky muscles. People covered in bulky muscles generally don't run super fast.

I can't think of any fast moving animal that is covered in bulky muscle.

Also, where did the superhuman strength come from in the first place? Does bigfoot spend it's days bench pressing the children it kidnaps?
 
That is one of the things that bothered me all along when I first became interested in bigfoot, the difference in descriptions. What people don't realize is that when you describe something with prognathism to the extent that these creatures look more like baboons versus a creature with a face like ours you are talking about morphology that dictates a different kind of brain structure. It can't be the same creature.
 
OS, do you not know what a hybrid is? A human can't hybridize with a human, that is called just breeding. If BF is a feral human, it can't hybridize with a human. Now you have to tell us all where a feral human got a mid tarsal break, lack of tool use (which would have been a very important attribute to a human living out in the elements), huge size, and open gorilla like nostrils.

Yeah, the footers who believe bigfoot is a human are digging themselves quite a deep hole, and they have no clue they are doing so.

Meldrum is the only one who sees how big the hole is becoming so he's trying to fill it in as fast as Ketchum digs it.
 
Yeah, the footers who believe bigfoot is a human are digging themselves quite a deep hole, and they have no clue they are doing so.

Meldrum is the only one who sees how big the hole is becoming so he's trying to fill it in as fast as Ketchum digs it.

It's not surprising. Get a bunch of people that don't know anything about any topic talking and you get something as stupid as people looking at bigfoot claims and determining that they perfectly describe Neanderthals. Or Denisovans. Or whatever Lucy was. They're all the same, right? :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom