Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This guy posted a video claiming Patty cannot be a human due to shin angle during walking:http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com...howComment=1330122117653#c8795670213003368624


This was then immediately disputed by a skeptic via his video here :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K9V1uUzu-U


I hope SweatiYeti reads this and checks out the rebuttal video at least. Pretty damning evidence IMO.

Meldrum knows this. He mentions the ground clearance issue in that Stanford test on the Best Evidence program. You can also see it on that skeletonized animation on the Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science disc. Somehow he never gets around to explaining why an animal would evolve as a super-efficient terrestrial biped with feet that require it to walk like that. Those are feet that are suited for liquid environments.
 
I think I have seen some of your pictures used by Sweaty to dismiss skeptial claims!!! LOL, good to meet you finally!

Logifail: I've posted videos before demonstrating the flipper walk over at the BFF. Proponents may fail to notice that people wearing flippers walk in a very similar manor to the film subject.
 
picture.php


same skin colour..same grey hair..same ear...
 
Here's the link to the photo itself.

[qimg]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yzIQTDQENHI/T0Z0zfVn65I/AAAAAAAABBM/7O1SBCl_Ybo/s1600/2012%2BWatermarked%2BGamcam%2BPhoto.jpg[/qimg]

The story says it is from a game cam. The thing that jumps out at me first are the plants in the background. They aren't far away, so the camera (if it was a game cam) must have been set up to watch the flowering bushes at night. The sasquatch seems to have wedged itself between the camera and the bush, possibly to smell the flowers? Are those honeysuckle, or clematus? Next, I thought that game cams used infrared flash, not visible white flash and color photos. Maybe there are various kinds, but most game cam photos I've seen tend to be B&W...

nope I have some that shoot in color, but this photo is clearly a faAKE IMHO.
 
Strange height for a gamecam. They usually mount them down at critter level. This one is up at Bigfoot shoulder height.

The thing is that Melissa is ripe for being suckered into a hoax, or knows/thinks it's a hoax but looks good enough to pass along to her believer flock.

it is almost conference season....
 
I saw this picture in Jan 2011. When you look close, so much of it cries hoax. I find it funny that Melissa stamped the name of her Girl scout troup on this and threw it out on Facebook. Another one of her cry for attention schemes. Even Munns is going with hoax.

Attention getting is spot on, now for the question, hoaxed or hoax(er) This thing has a very MRPish feel to it.
 
Surely you don't think the trailcam "display" was tampered with? That's way too sophisticated for this. When was the "Clawed" costume auctioned off? 2006? When did Melissa get this photo? 2008? What exactly is the person who bought the costume expected to do with it? Hmmm...what to do? :D
 
Surely you don't think the trailcam "display" was tampered with? That's way too sophisticated for this. When was the "Clawed" costume auctioned off? 2006? When did Melissa get this photo? 2008? What exactly is the person who bought the costume expected to do with it? Hmmm...what to do? :D

Sarcasm dully noted, it just deoesnt look like a trail cam.
 
Surely you don't think the trailcam "display" was tampered with? That's way too sophisticated for this. When was the "Clawed" costume auctioned off? 2006? When did Melissa get this photo? 2008? What exactly is the person who bought the costume expected to do with it? Hmmm...what to do? :D

This isnt the same costume.
 
doesnt quite explain the museum esque plant life

The strangest thing to me about the plant life is the position in the photo. I have seen leaves just like that on hikes, but the blooms look strange. The story we are given kinda neutralizes what I thought common sense would be with mounting a trail cam.
 
It's the back end of a small long-haired dog, looking from the front. What looks like the head is actually it's tail curled onto its back.
That's why the photo is so severely cropped.

A dog end, eh? Is it Aqualung's dog?
 

There are some interesting numbers in the eBay auction for that costume...

eBay seller said:
This item stands approximately 6′6" (including footware) and was designed for the lead actor who was 6′2" and 210lbs. The suit is quite large, so please be aware that it may require modifications for those smaller than six feet. I myself have tried on this suit (5′10", 175 lbs) and found that by bulking it out using pillow foam worked just fine

Human of average size + padded suit = 6'6" monster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom