• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie nominations

I've got the winner.

As proof there was no 9/11 hijackers.


tmd2_1 said:
If it was a 30 year conspiracy as Bob kerrey says...how could they possibly be involved when they weren't even born.
Click to expand...

And then he goes on:

tmd2_1 said:
That would have been my exact response as well, because I would have thought there is no way he is talking about 9/11. But you left off kerrey's answer which was (paraphrasing) that's what I'm talking about!

How could someone be around to plan something before they were even born?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
I've got the winner.

As proof there was no 9/11 hijackers.




And then he goes on:
Click to expand...

I wish I hadn't slept in today; I really wanted that one. But how about this:

tmd2_1 said:
Here's the whole version it still has the cuts...but you can see the context it was in. There just wasn't enough time to cut anything, Kerrey wanted to leave before the guy started asking him questions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtJWBcWAeAw
The voice follows exactly can't believe it changed anything. Why they cut it I can't be sure, maybe for dramatic affect. But as I said Kerrey would not let this stand...no way he would.
Click to expand...

So it's the whole version of the video except for the cuts but that's not important.
 
Another gem from FB

Too bad 97% of the victim family members took the "Hush money" aka the 9/11 Compensation fund! Or there would be MANY more.

[...]

I HONOR them by REMEMBERING them! Whereas you just wish it would all go away. Close your eyes Bill, go back to sleep.

[...]

I never said they took bribes...... You used that word. 97% of the victim family members from the WTC took the "9/11 Compensation Fund"........ in vow for their silence. If only they knew what we know today!

[...]

Sure sounds like a BRIBE to me! But I didn;t use that word..... you did!
Click to expand...
 
Having thought about it I may as well nominate this;
Scott Sommers said:
Taiwan is the last bastion of democracy against the Communist Empire, which really these days consists only of the the People's Republic of China.
Click to expand...

Essentially, Taiwan is apparently our only bulwark against something that is shrivelling into nothingness at a rate of knots...it's got to be a Poe, but I'll give it a go.






Hey...I'm a poet and I didn't knowit!
 
Patrick1000 said:
So Erock, that is how they did it. Before the staged Apollo 11 flight, NASA landed an unmanned craft with such a device, one sensitive to laser targeting and also capable of automatically recording the coordinates of its location. The device's position was confirmed by targeting well before 07/20/1969.

The Lick Observatory team is given these coordinates,
00 41 15 N and 23 26 00 E well before Reed determines coordinates anything close to these. And the rest as they say, "is bogus history".
Click to expand...


The Great Moon Hoax expands to include the USGS and personnel at Lick Observatory.
 
Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/BFischer/BSpassky/sicilian/etc. shows off his mad research skillz in the service of his profound engineering judgment.

Patrick1000 said:
...I'd like to take a quick look instead at a "funny" feature in the original Apollo 11 Technical Crew Report.

Here indeed is a gem of a find. Let's take a look at some astronaut chit-chat from the original version of the Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing...

Shall we drop in on the boys at section 8-18 of the original Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing Report? Here, our Eagle Scouts in training, fresh as can be, having showered and shaved post their 9 day effort to score the highly coveted "NASA Acting Merit Badge", begin to discuss a bit of a problem they'd had with the readout on the lunar module DEDA. The DEDA of course being the Abort Guidance System's readout window. A quote from the report;...

The interesting thing about the above passage from the Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing is that it doesn't appear at all in the debriefing's more recent republication. If one looks at the NASA authorized Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing Report republication, for example in the collection of NASA authorized reports published by Apogee, compiled from the NASA archives and edited by Robert Godwin, well I'll be a space monkey's great uncle, we see that these comments by Aldrin simply do not appear....

Of course, on the other hand, some smart aleck might have the temerity to suggest they're trying to hide something,...

Piloting a space ship is serious business. Obviously, saying "pretty minor" to not being able to read the abort guidance system's DEDA is "VERY BOGUS". So we have a case here of astronaut lying. Lying no less about something so very important that they're willing to risk major exposure/vulnerability by deleting the statement from the clearly DOCTORED/REDACTED Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing Report republication.

My oh my, how those astronauts do lie.
Click to expand...

When I pointed out that the excerpt in question is found with a quick Internet search in the various online versions hosted by NASA (PDF of original, rescanned PDF, and pure HTML version), as well as readily available from various public sites, fattydash/Patrick1000/etc. admonished,

Patrick1000 said:
sts,

Of course the original copy has the 8-18 Aldrin quote as stated and of course it is found on the internet. The point was that the Aldrin quote is missing from the REPUBLICATIONS such as that edited by Robert Godwin and published by Apogee.

Now if you purchased an Apollo 11 Mission Report collection by Apogee , the Godwin edit, AND you showed me that had the stuff that I claim was removed in there, I would say, "wow sts, you got me". But you will find that is not the case. Please check the publication I mentioned. you will not find the Aldrin quote in there. It has been removed intentionally by Godwin at the behest of the keepers of the lies.

And again, of course you found the lie/quote in the original publication. Where do you think I found it?
Click to expand...
(bolding mine)


Well, in the copy of the original provided to anyone with a Web browser by NASA. The same "keepers of the lies" who ensure the big cover-up by publishing it on their own Web site.


But I guess a second-party reprint is the important thing; that wayFD/P1000/etc. followed up with,

Patrick1000 said:
OH yes sts, please keep in mind these republications are NASA authorized. And we can see why, authorized with a very special reason in mind.
Click to expand...

Can I guess the reason? How about, "To embarrass pretend doctor/scientists with bad research skills and a grudge?" But wait, there's more!

Patrick1000 said:
WOW!!!, it is true sts. I did find the quote in another section of my Apogee publication. Not in 8-18. So i do withdraw my claim about the Apogee publication. However, the point about Aldrin's lying stands. Of course a DEDA reading "3" instead of "9" or "9" instead of "3" would be a major concern and not a "pretty minor" thing. The statement by Aldrin is clearly a lie. That said, i was incorrect in my suggestion it was being covered up by removing it from the Apogee publication. It is in there, under a different heading than the original 8-18.
Click to expand...

"Never mind! But it's still a hoax!"

Pure comedy gold.
 
This whole post is a mess:

WTC Dust said:
The problem with the NIST report is that it did not analyze the
destruction of the WTC. It stopped the analysis right before the
destruction occurred. If it had analyzed the destruction, it would
have had to account for the creation of all the dust, the precipitous
manner of the destruction, and the rather shallow depression
located in the footprint of WTC 1 and WTC 2 at the end of it all.

Gravity works straight down. If gravity were the cause of the
destruction, you'd have a pile of debris centered in the footprints.
Instead, most of the debris fell outside the footprints. Since gravity
doesn't work sideways, a full explanation cannot use gravity alone
as a mechanism.

Gravity doesn't explain why the tops of the buildings didn't fall
relatively intact on the ground. There was nothing above the
top floors to crush them, after all, and if you drop a steel cage
from a very tall height, you end up with a steel cage. Nothing
about falling can turn steel into tiny pieces of steel.
Click to expand...

I especially like the last paragraph.
 
Irrefutable Freeman-on-the-Land logic in the commentary section of an Ottawa Sun article:

Does he or the movement acknowledge Money, the welfare cheque that they're probably getting or our free healthcare?
Click to expand...

Canada no longer has a Rule of Law. Our laws have been twisted and interpreted to suit the crime and the perpetrator. Individuals are able to pick and choose the laws they wish to obey. As for those social services, well, those are entitlements. One is always entitled to one's entitlements.
Click to expand...
 
Anything that means we pay them is wrong, anything that means they pay us is right.

Freemanism in a nutshell
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom