August Stundie Nomination Thread Of Awesome

[nathan]

Force of gravity weakens inversely proportional to its distance, but never completely disappears, but for practical purposes we can say that the space lab has a very weak influence from the earth's gravity due to its distance away from earth, the earth may still exert some minute pull at it, and hence every so often most satellites and space stations need correction via small rockets, hence all satellites must carry some on board fuel for this correction, hence the amount fuel for correction is what determines a life of a satellite.

So, how much fuel is on the moon? we should go mine it!

 

[Alareth]

So, how much fuel is on the moon? we should go mine it!

The ability to mine hydrogen is a key step to a permanent moon colony.

 

[ehcks]

Mikefromlondon just keeps on giving:


Read more: http://www.diynot.com/forums/general-discussion/gravity.372974/page-2#ixzz2bpukXUsr

Lucky it isn't then.

I love WolframAlpha. You can just type in (Mass of the sun)/((Volume of the Earth)*(Density of lead)) and it gives you a number. It's too bad people don't use it before coming up with horribly wrong math.

 

[Travis]

Well everyone I was beset with a huge personal crisis that sapped all my time for a few days but I should be giving you all what you deserve soon: The July Finals.

 

[NoahFence]

Well everyone I was beset with a huge personal crisis that sapped all my time for a few days but I should be giving you all what you deserve soon: The July Finals.

I hope your crisis is resolved and everything's OK.

 

[Travis]

Yes, crisis resolved. Sleep patterns almost restore. Health much good. Syntax questionable.

 

[Horatius]

I should be giving you all what you deserve soon:

Well, that sounds kind of ominous.

 

[thedopefishlives]

Yes, crisis resolved. Sleep patterns almost restore. Health much good. Syntax questionable.

So in other words, business as usual?

 

[jaydeehess]

[parsing] I should be giving you all what you deserve soon: [/parsing].

Oh noes! How far back do I have to answer for?

 

[Dog Town]

Syntax questionable.

Yes! Question Mark?

 

[Supermac]

Over on the DI Forum they're discussing evolution which is, apparently, an Illuminati scam. This quote sums up the quality of the debate:

"I can sort of get my head round an amphibian leaving the sea and evolving into birds, mammals & eventually humans, but why and how would they evolve into say a woodlice or ant?"

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=253026&page=11

 

[phiwum]

Over on the DI Forum they're discussing evolution which is, apparently, an Illuminati scam. This quote sums up the quality of the debate:

"I can sort of get my head round an amphibian leaving the sea and evolving into birds, mammals & eventually humans, but why and how would they evolve into say a woodlice or ant?"

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=253026&page=11

That's a pretty good thread. Some of them can't even get the usual nonsensical arguments right.

Evolution goes against the first law of thermodynamics

So, evolution violates conservation of energy?

 

[Safe-Keeper]

I should be giving you all what you deserve soon

Help.

 

[jaydeehess]

So, evolution violates conservation of energy?

Suppose he is trying to say that evolution to higher species is a decrease in entropy?

 

[phiwum]

Suppose he is trying to say that evolution to higher species is a decrease in entropy?

Yes, that's what I think he's saying.

I still thought it was funny that he said first, rather than second, law. Sure, it's just a little error, and even someone who knows thermodynamics can type the wrong thing, but it just struck me as funny.

 

[jaydeehess]

Yes, that's what I think he's saying.

I still thought it was funny that he said first, rather than second, law. Sure, it's just a little error, and even someone who knows thermodynamics can type the wrong thing, but it just struck me as funny.

Even if he said second he'd still be wrong. That he displays his ignorance so beautifully by citing the wrong concept is just icing on the Stundie cake.

 

[Bishop]

There's also a guy there pulling out some of the older-than-dirt quote mines from scientists. Even after he's been called out on it, he's still insisting that it's totally okay to do that.

 

[Biscuit]

Over on the DI Forum they're discussing evolution which is, apparently, an Illuminati scam. This quote sums up the quality of the debate:

"I can sort of get my head round an amphibian leaving the sea and evolving into birds, mammals & eventually humans, but why and how would they evolve into say a woodlice or ant?"

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=253026&page=11

Can I nominate an ad? Cause the first ad I saw when I clicked that link said that "cancer is a fungus."

 

[LordXenu]

Here's a new take on chemtrails:
http://www.naturalnews.com/040925_transhumanism_Ray_Kurzweil_cult.html#comment-950013790

Have you looked up the Carnicom Institute and seen what I am talking about? There are no "products" involved. Here in America the airplanes are spraying us with nanoparticulate fibers. It is being breathed in by every single person, is in our groundwater and our soil and is killing people and giving them sores all over their bodies. In the confines of a technological gadgit, I agree it is not necessarily harmful. But mega tons of this crap is being sprayed all over the air here everyday. It would be beneficial to you to look it up so that you understand the consequences of nanotechnology poisoning in the human body. If you don't look it up then you are the ignorant one, not me.

 

[LSSBB]

Here's a new take on chemtrails:
http://www.naturalnews.com/040925_transhumanism_Ray_Kurzweil_cult.html#comment-950013790

It must be true, it's nano by gum.