Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

Yes, those atheists (if they truly are and not just saying so to keep their jobs) are acting monstrous. Noone here denied that. They just deny your leap of 'logic' that because they are behaving badly, all atheists are monsters or even that all atheists agree with them.

You keep dodging the question that if the catholic church clearly harboured and protected pedophiles, then by that same logic all catholics feel that pedophilia must be legal and endorsed.
 
Yes, those atheists (if they truly are and not just saying so to keep their jobs) are acting monstrous. Noone here denied that. They just deny your leap of 'logic' that because they are behaving badly, all atheists are monsters or even that all atheists agree with them.

You keep dodging the question that if the catholic church clearly harboured and protected pedophiles, then by that same logic all catholics feel that pedophilia must be legal and endorsed.

Certainly they have denied it, hell look at the second post, look at the posts repeating rank propaganda. Further, I have endeavored to be quite careful to avoid saying that makes all atheists monsters, certainly the Marxist ones we are discussing and their apologists are acting like monsters.

“Dodging” a question that has nothing to do with this thread? Do you think I or anyone else is dumb enough to fall for such a blatantly fallacious derail. For Pete’s sake if you had posted “and you are lynching negroes” might have made it just as obvious that you are attempting deflect criticism from these on going human rights violations.

Take a look at the article I linked just up above. Let’s endeavor to use critical thinking going forward, please?
 
Last edited:
Certainly they have denied it, hell look at the second post, look at the posts repeating rank propaganda. Further, I have endeavored to be quite careful to avoid saying that makes all atheists monsters, certainly the Marxist ones we are discussing and their apologists are acting like monsters.

Nobody is defending forced abjurations in this forum.

The second post says:
“Yeah, it is. But the idea that you think that this is characteristic of atheism rather than an activity of the totalitarian government of China is even more appalling.”

I don’t see any defence of Chinese’s government religious politics. Quite the opposite: "Yeah, it is [apalling]".
You see visions.

Arthwollipot was telling you an evident true that you have not understand along the whole forum.

Let us see:

Many Catholic priests like to rape children. This is a monstrous act. I hope you would agree.
There are Catholics that like to rape children. Do you agree?
They rape the children because they are Catholic. Do you agree?

I hope that your high intelligence would be able to understand where the logic mistake lies. (In reality, I am not so sure).
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Nobody is defending forced abjurations in this forum.

The second post says:
“Yeah, it is. But the idea that you think that this is characteristic of atheism rather than an activity of the totalitarian government of China is even more appalling.”

I don’t see any defence of Chinese’s government religious politics. Quite the opposite: "Yeah, it is [apalling]".
You see visions.

Arthwollipot was telling you an evident true that you have not understand along the whole forum..

No, let’s walk through it, together.

Tbd: Here is something that is appalling
Response: yeah, it is but even more appalling is a post on the internet.

That should show you that our correspondent does not believe it is appalling the slightest, indeed a post on the ******* internet is worse.

They are putting a million Muslims in re-education camps, but even worse is TBD was mean to atheists on the iSkep!
 
For a more nuanced understanding of the event: http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Beij...ights-are-being-violated,-enough!'-44513.html and https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/e...arge-underground-protestant-church-in-beijing

Obviously is an attack of the municipal Beijing Police against underground —unauthorized— Protestant churches. It is not an attack of the Atheism against Christianity.
It's just that you have to know how to look for the news.

Folks, you have to “know how to look for the news.” So absolutely make sure that the articles you look for are so limited, err “nuanced,” that they don’t mention putting million Muslims in re-education camps.

Guys, y’all got to know what to look for, ya see.
 
Folks, you have to “know how to look for the news.” So absolutely make sure that the articles you look for are so limited, err “nuanced,” that they don’t mention putting million Muslims in re-education camps.

Guys, y’all got to know what to look for, ya see.


You're changing the subject. Before we move on to the issue of mususlmans, we should clarify the issue of clandestine Protestant churches. This is the subject with which you started the thread and to which Arthwollipot responded. Do not manipulate the data. you arealso manipulating my comments by skipping the reasoning I gave you. Probably because you don't know what to say. Your propaganda slogans are finished and you deflate like a balloon.
For more information on the problem of the Beijing churches, I suggest you to consult the following links, which give a very different view of what you were saying.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-c...nd-protestant-church-in-beijing-idUKKCN1LQ07O

http://asianews.it/news-en/Beijing’s-Zion-Church-'legally-banned'-44892.html

https://www.christianpost.com/news/...igious-crackdown-gets-worse-and-worse-226413/

https://www.christianpost.com/news/...ime-arrest-pastor-over-30-churchgoers-226201/


As you can see, no people forced to abjure and no people beaten to death. No martyrs in this Coliseum. The story of Quo vadis?you was telling us is over.
The reasons for closing churches were political. You can see how other "official" churches work without too many problems.
http://www.beijingbaptistchurch.org/
http://www.china.org.cn/english/TR-e/41245.htm
 
I would like to know your response to this:

Many Catholic priests like to rape children. This is a monstrous act. I hope you would agree.
There are Catholics that like to rape children. Do you agree?
They rape the children because they are Catholic. Do you agree?

I hope that your high intelligence would be able to understand where the logic mistake lies. (In reality, I am not so sure).

Thank you.
 
And I'll tell you one thing that will surely surprise you, since you don't have much idea what Marxism is. If the Chinese government needs all that mess of official and unofficial churches, it's because it's not Marxist. It is strange, is it not? It is something similar to current Christians who have nothing Christian in the evangelical sense of the word. If Jesus the Messiah were to raise his head, he would run back to the tomb.
 
Last edited:
I would like to know your response to this:

Many Catholic priests like to rape children. This is a monstrous act. I hope you would agree.
There are Catholics that like to rape children. Do you agree?
They rape the children because they are Catholic. Do you agree?

I hope that your high intelligence would be able to understand where the logic mistake lies. (In reality, I am not so sure).

Thank you.

Expect him to quote you but then ask you a question about the 2017 Vegas Shooting and make an ill-formed correlation and then proclaim atheists are behind all mass shootings. He won't, however, actually address your question.
 
I answered your question. Sorry you did not like the answer.

Why did you just duck my question? Are these atheists acting like monsters?

Yes or no.

Why is so difficult for CCL apologists to stay on topic?
Meh, I don't believe in "monsters" either, so your term is too undefined for me to answer yes or no to.
 
And I'll tell you one thing that will surely surprise you, since you don't have much idea what Marxism is. If the Chinese government needs all that mess of official and unofficial churches, it's because it's not Marxist. It is strange, is it not? It is something similar to current Christians who have nothing Christian in the evangelical sense of the word. If Jesus the Messiah were to raise his head, he would run back to the tomb.


I just took a look at this website (marxist.org) with a collection of links to all the things that Marx and Engels ever wrote about religion and atheism. It's surprisingly little! (Most of the links are to texts where they only touch marginally upon the themes of religion and atheism.)
The introduction to Marx's "A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (1844; more than 20 years before he published the first volume of Capital), the text with the famous sentence, "Religion is the opium of the people," still seems to be the major part of what Marx had to say about this them: He explained briefly what religion was - and that was it! It seems as if he didn't find the theme particularly interesting after this, and he went on to dedicate the rest of his life to the critique of political economy, culminating with Capital.
I can see why it may be disappointing to TBD that the author of the alleged Marxist Atheist Bible wasn't particularly interested in religion ... or atheism, but that is the fact of this case: The obsession of Chinese rulers with religion doesn't have anything to do with Marx and his writings.
 
I’m changing the subject by mentioning China’s crackdown on Muslims.

Wow.

Then ask a grossly off topic and completely illogical question about priests.

You cannot make this stuff up.
 
Fellas. Hi! As should have been obvious by now, no one is claiming that the people running the CCP are the best Marxists, but they make up for in spades by pushing the firm Marxist atheist party line, and throwing about a million Muslims in re-education camps.
 
And what exactly is supposed to be Marxist or atheist about that party line?!
 
And what exactly is supposed to be Marxist or atheist about that party line?!

ask Chairman Xi, that is what he is claiming in order to establish Firm Marxist Atheism, and if you want to claim he is a more firm atheist than Marxist, I ain't gonna bother quibbling with you
 
Well, Trump claims that he's a very stable genius. I don't believe him, but you believe Chairman Xi.
 

Back
Top Bottom