Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

Too bad it is difficult for some to understand everyone is an atheist. Even TBD, who disrespects Magog by all his Bible-waving, for example: Abrahamic nonsense mythology for the clueless or wanton. Get-rich-quick schemes like Magog's are so much more down-to-Earth and practical. Given the many, many, many millions deaths at the hands of the followers of Abraham, anyone so professing is admitting to being bent on pure evil, bereft of the dimmest notion of morality.

Magog for the win. Down with murderous Middle-eastern monotheists.

Say, again, who sees the flaw in the above quoted post?

Nope, I am not talking about the blatant whatsboutism derail nonsense (although obvious)

Here is another hint for y'all: "A."

Oh man, I see that the "skeptics" are baffled by what possibly could be the flaw(s) in the quoted post. The answer is of course is that not believing in Magog does not make you an atheist where one believes in the God of Abraham. Sorry that the question was so difficult.

I am sure that we will get posts stating that asking hard questions to atheists is "hate speech."
 
Sure. Because all those examples of totalitarian regimes that called themselves Marxist were not true Marxists.
Exactly; in the same way that that "National Socialist" party in the late '30s and into the '40s was anything but "socialist."

It's like you're discovering for the first time that names of things sometimes do not describe what the entities in question actually do.
 
Do you believe that atheism is evil, then?

Of course atheists are evil!

Without the guiding light of a book to set out morality, how can atheists be anything but evil? Nothing is sacred to atheists - human life is no more valuable than a rock. This is why Chinese atheists have no problem killing the faithful; religionistas are worth less than the rock to an atheist - the rock already doesn't believe in gods.

If only atheists would give away their hard materialism and recognise the truth of the bible, they could give up their amoral lifestyles and do things approved by the bible, like:

Having sex with your children.
Killing non-believers' families, even unto the fourth generation.
Killing an entire generation of babies in a fit of pique.
Killing every child alive that wasn't bred by some Jewish bloke called Noah.

And they'd have to give up their evil habits of shaving and eating crayfish.
 
I missed your answer to this?

No you didn’t, I did not bother answering it because it has zero to do with the post.

You see, the post was about the actual human rights violations going on right now in China. My opinion regarding atheists in general is quite inconsequential.

These atheists are clearly monsters. Don’t you agree?
 
Hey, great, more fanatical anti-theists comments. Zzzzxxx

Somebody do me a solid, and give me a nudge and let me know when the snowflake storm passes.
 
Of course atheists are evil!

Without the guiding light of a book to set out morality, how can atheists be anything but evil? Nothing is sacred to atheists - human life is no more valuable than a rock. This is why Chinese atheists have no problem killing the faithful; religionistas are worth less than the rock to an atheist - the rock already doesn't believe in gods.

If only atheists would give away their hard materialism and recognise the truth of the bible, they could give up their amoral lifestyles and do things approved by the bible, like:

Having sex with your children.
Killing non-believers' families, even unto the fourth generation.
Killing an entire generation of babies in a fit of pique.
Killing every child alive that wasn't bred by some Jewish bloke called Noah.

And they'd have to give up their evil habits of shaving and eating crayfish.

I wear mixed fabrics every day just to make god cry.
 
“In the name of atheism I condemn you to death”.

This thread has been a train wreck from the first post, and equally watchable.
 
No you didn’t, I did not bother answering it because it has zero to do with the post.

False. You never answer messages that bother you. I am waiting for your answer to mine for days. In the same way for others similar.
You just sing a repetitive mantra no matter the others tell you. There is not better deaf that the one that doesn't want hear.
 
I am sure that we will get posts stating that asking hard questions to atheists is "hate speech."


You set your hate speech pretty well in the thread title.


The rest from you is either reinforcing it or gaslighting, or a mix, like the post of yours I'm quoting. Evasion and argumentum ad voluminous canine complete the thread scope.
 
The Big Dog said:
I missed your answer to this?

No you didn’t, I did not bother answering it because it has zero to do with the post.

You see, the post was about the actual human rights violations going on right now in China. My opinion regarding atheists in general is quite inconsequential.

These atheists are clearly monsters. Don’t you agree?


You see: evasion and gaslighting, besides a great deal of argumentum ad voluminous canine.
 
This thread is for the purpose of discussing the “signal an alarming escalation in persecution of citizens in China under Xi Jinping. USCIRF condemns the Chinese government’s ongoing brutal and systematic targeting of religious communities for their beliefs."
That is not your claim and you know it.

people were outraged that I quoted articles and experts pointing out that Firm Marxist Atheism was a driving factor for Chinese government’s ongoing brutal and systematic targeting of religious communities for their beliefs
And now we get to the meat. All atheists are evil. Because the RCC.

It is amusing that your pretzel logic has led you to be a defender of islam. When are you converting?
 
No you didn’t, I did not bother answering it because it has zero to do with the post.

You see, the post was about the actual human rights violations going on right now in China. My opinion regarding atheists in general is quite inconsequential.

These atheists are clearly monsters. Don’t you agree?
You've made it clear that you find the interrelationship between atheism and the actions of these persons significant. How can it have zero to do with the post, when it is the point you are stressing most? Why are you reluctant to just state your case, clearly and concisely?
 
“In the name of atheism I condemn you to death”.

This thread has been a train wreck from the first post, and equally watchable.

Well, the second post for sure.

In the name of atheism I demand that you sign this paper renouncing your faith and if not I will put you and a million other Muslims in a detention camp, destroy your churches/mosques and burn your Books.

Those are the facts at issue in this thread with this religious pogrom.

The depth of denial in this thread from the vast majority of the atheists is surprising.
 
You've made it clear that you find the interrelationship between atheism and the actions of these persons significant. How can it have zero to do with the post, when it is the point you are stressing most? Why are you reluctant to just state your case, clearly and concisely?

I answered your question. Sorry you did not like the answer.

Why did you just duck my question? Are these atheists acting like monsters?

Yes or no.

Why is so difficult for CCL apologists to stay on topic?
 

Back
Top Bottom