Atheism Plus/Free Thought Blogs (FTB)

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what were they going to do? Tell Ron Lindsay he could no longer attend the conference he organized?

I guess we can assume the A-Plusers are now going to boycott CFI events. Add that they are already boycotting TAM, and soon there will be no conferences they can attend. Will they organize their own? That would be highly, highly entertaining, but sadly, highly, highly unlikely, since I doubt any of them have any money.

Money be blowed. They could have millions at their disposal, and they wouldn't manage to organize a piss-up in a brewery. A+ is the place the incompetents go to talk about how much better they are at doing things than the rest of us. Except they don't actually do anything.
 
Last edited:
So what were they going to do? Tell Ron Lindsay he could no longer attend the conference he organized?

I guess we can assume the A-Plusers are now going to boycott CFI events. Add that they are already boycotting TAM, and soon there will be no conferences they can attend. Will they organize their own? That would be highly, highly entertaining, but sadly, highly, highly unlikely, since I doubt any of them have any money.

They already did, it was call SkepchickCon and it looked like an embarrassment. Ironically, TAM had a higher percentage of female speakers (and competent ones too boot)

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/Con01-e1351891188832.jpg

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for Rule 5. Do not hotlink images.


Posted under the right of parody.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the same forum I just linked to, here's another example of a call to genocide by an SJW. Link, post #17

Note how that call goes unchallenged.

From that link, Ken Burch's words:
Discussions of racism are discussions where white people should just sit and listen.

:eek: Yes because only white people are racist, and no other race are racist against each other (let alone against white people).

And Viigan followed nicely with a comment:
I range from dark brown in the summer to a sort of olive lighter brown in the winter. Can I post here seasonally, or not at all Ken?

Mmm, better check first, might be 'splaining otherwise.

Milo204 comes back, later, with:
And what exactly are the attributes that make you so proud to be white? capitalism, slavery, sitcoms, nuclear weapons, environmental destruction?

great job guys keep up the good work!

I suppose by spotting this pathetic white-guilt makes me an MRA? I'll be right back, I need to check my bourgeois upbringing... erhh, I mean privilege.
 
If one grants that it's possible, the next question is, is it worth it? Does the outcome warrant the effort? Are you willing to jettison a perfectly cromulent word because someone -- not even necessarily the person you're speaking to, but someone overhearing you -- might be upset because of the way the word has previously been used by other people in other contexts? I have yet to hear a convincing argument that I should.

You're rather niggardly with your words here. I expected a much longer response.
 
The question of whether women perform more housework than men is well-settled, although there certainly differences in different countries and over-time. Do a google scholar search on gender division of household labor. See, e.g., Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household
Labor""
which uses both survey data and time-diary data. The disputed question is to what extent gender (as opposed to non-gender based factors like time availability) influences who does the housework.

Ah, I see. I did prematurely assume that the study was about the actual differences in household labour participation and just skimmed over the relevant parts. My bad.

However, I still don't understand why the input of men on the same subject would be superfluous to the subject in question, given that they're the other half of the equation.
 
I suppose by spotting this pathetic white-guilt makes me an MRA? I'll be right back, I need to check my bourgeois upbringing... erhh, I mean privilege.

It just might. They're not so fussed with MRAs over there because they're short of feminists these days. Apparently there were too many men "splainin' things, so they sort of evaporated.

There is a lot of parallels between that site and A+, It's sort of like APusse's big brother. A WAG ? maybe 10 times the posting rate over at babble when compared to A+ and it is possible to follow an issue on both the JREF and babble, at the same time because the threads don't peter out as quickly as they do on A+

Different silencing techniques though. Babble has set up their terms of service to say anti-imperialist, anti-colonial, anti-yada yada and someone posting with the wrong perspective will be curtly told that their ideas are in violation of "babble policy" with an order to not post on the thread again.

Contrast this with A+ who tell a poster they're derailing and go start another thread. Example ? I knew you'd ask. On Apluss's Sarkesian/video thread a poster, Frog Saga critiques the video and ceepolk comes in with......Start A Thread...on a thread that's about the video being critiqued. You can't be any more on topic than that.

Link Page 6
 
Report here on alleged censorship of MRA sites by the UK ISP 02, (though they have just been bought up by SKY)

Mobile operator O2 UK has been accused of unfair “sexism and political censorship” after its mobile broadband platform was found to still be blocking over 100 websites that promote equality for men and or which have dedicated themselves to helping male victims of domestic violence and rape.




http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...censorship-by-male-human-rights-websites.html

-
 
Last edited:
Well, I probably shouldn't but once I'm triggered by a few lines falling into place I just have to try to finish it. So here it is and I apologize in advance for anyone offended.


The A Plussers (sung to the tune of The Black Widow by Alice Cooper)



These words they speak are true
We’re all misogynistic too if
We don't pledge allegiance to
The A plussers

The justice that they bring
Up punching is the thing
Until everyone is king
The A plussers

Our minds will be destroyed
And everyone annoyed If a PM is deployed
The A plussers

Trigger me
Don’t you trigger me
Trigger them
Don’t you trigger them
Trigger me
Don’t you trigger me

Intent’s not magic so they say and create along the way
A space safe for
things held silent
They burst onto the scene
With a passion so extreme they tell some people
To be quiet

Trigger me
Don’t you trigger me
Trigger them
Don’t you trigger them
Trigger me
Don’t you trigger me
Trigger them
Don’t you trigger them

I had, I have to say,
Enough spoons to meet the day
Till a spork got in my way
The A plussers

Internet hugs just for you
Unless you just don’t want us to
Since we pledge allegiance to
The A plussers
 
Last edited:
:eek: Yes because only white people are racist, and no other race are racist against each other (let alone against white people).

According to social justice, non-white people can't be racist, because racism equals "prejudice + power", and non-white people don't have any power. If a non-white person hates white people, it's "reverse racism". (I know, right? :rolleyes:)

So how do you define the anti-semitism of some African-Americans? Or the strongly-held belief of some Japanese that they are genetically superior to Koreans? Or the anti-Hmong hatred of some Asians? etc. etc.
 
And what exactly are the attributes that make you so proud to be white? capitalism, slavery, sitcoms, nuclear weapons, environmental destruction?

Sitcoms. Out of that list definitely sitcoms.
 
So how do you define the anti-semitism of some African-Americans? Or the strongly-held belief of some Japanese that they are genetically superior to Koreans? Or the anti-Hmong hatred of some Asians? etc. etc.

Those last two don't count because they're not American examples. SJWs shouldn't be discussing non-American things, because of privilege.
 
SJWs shouldn't be discussing non-American things, because of privilege.


Please note that the approved SJW phraseology is "because privilege." The use of the word "of" after the word "because" immediately identifies you as Not One Of Us and will get you many sideways glances, as it reenforces the prescriptive, preposition-normative status quo. Prepositions only serve to force sentence parts into some sort of relationship to one another, thereby giving one dominance over the other, thereby supporting the patriarchy, and should hence be used only when absolutely necessary. Therefore compound prepositions are exponentially more oppressive, and are considered a deliberate act of aggression. Besides which, not everyone has the spoons to slog through your superfluous verbiage. Some members are unable to function for days after being triggered by seeing an "of" after a "because." Do it again without a huge trigger warning in big flashing letters (which itself must of course be preceded by a trigger warning about big flashing letters), and you'll get a week-long vacation to think about what you've done. Because arbitrary in-group jargon.
 
Last edited:
Could anyone explain me what's the story behind spoons and SJW? I must have missed that.

The origin of the spoon metaphor:

http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

The A+ people seem to be using it in a way that is cautioned against in this article:

Many disabled people have grabbed onto the spoons metaphor as an everyday way to explain a lack of energy or mental or physical ability. My question is, when we are trying to demystify/de-stigmatize/de-euphemize disability, why are we in fact hiding behind this rather weak metaphor? Telling a colleague that I’m “out of spoons” for the day doesn’t explain what’s going on with me the same way saying that I’m in too much pain to walk three blocks for coffee does. Its cuteness might serve to alleviate concern in non-disabled colleagues about our abilities to get our jobs done, but in doing so it lessens considerably our colleagues’ actual understanding of our disabilities. Hiding behind the generalization and euphemism of the spoons makes our disabilities even more invisible than they might be; it becomes synonymous with the phrases “I’m beat,” “I’m out of steam,” and “I’m knackered”–all of which mean essentially the same thing–lack of energy–to the non-disabled community. How long will it be before everyone starts to end a day of shopping by plopping down in Starbucks with “Phew–I’m out of spoons. Decaf latte, please.”
http://academicronin.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/against-the-spoon-metaphor/
 
Could anyone explain me what's the story behind spoons and SJW? I must have missed that.

Just google "spoon theory" and you'll find all you need to know and more besides.

This is not to be confused with "fork theory", although that may just be a reformulation of spoon theory using Lagrangians and the Principle of Least Action (a central tenet on A+).
 
Just google "spoon theory" and you'll find all you need to know and more besides.

This is not to be confused with "fork theory", although that may just be a reformulation of spoon theory using Lagrangians and the Principle of Least Action (a central tenet on A+).

I'm working on a controversial spork theory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom