Ask all firefighting and fire related questions here

[triforcharity]

Riverdance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[tfk]

I had faith in the Captain when you did not Lashl. I knew he would come through. And I think his very senior rank is confirmed in his latest post despite your seeming intent to water down his credentials.

Let's see:

I had faith in the Captain

Cloying, insincere suck-up #1.

... when you did not Lashl.

Lie #1.

I knew he would come through.

Cloying, insincere suck-up #2.

And I think his very senior rank is confirmed in his latest post ...

Delusion of personal significance #1.
His rank was confirmed by a career of hard work & achievement. Not by a response to your trollish nonsense.

... despite your seeming intent to water down his credentials.

Lie #2.

I see Bill's shooting just about average today...

 

[Telltale Tom]

Look I should just remind you what the ae911truth policy is on fire, and the questions that really need to be asked. Just look at our web site.

If you look at the top 14 reasons to believe in CD, many of them are related to fire.

The "pyroclastic-like" dust clounds prove enormous heat. Some form of thermite-like detonation I guess

And according to us, we did find several tons of molten metal. So I dont know what you guys are talking about that this is a lie.

And of course the third reason is that there is no precedent of tall buildings So statistically it must be very unlikely for 3 towers to fall down in one day.

If you add in the thermite dust evidence, then the fire issues constitute 5 out of our 14 main reasons to believe in CD. These are the questions that ae911truth want answering. "Its the shout that will be heard around the world."

 

[Dave Rogers]

I'm definitely calling Poe's Law.

Dave

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Pyroclastic-like dust clouds... yet, on news reports, you clearly saw people walking out of them clearly not cooked to death.

And: You (AE911T) found several tons of molten metal? Mind sharing proof of this? Say, photographs? Because, to be blunt, much steel was recovered above and beyond what NIST studied - recall that other agencies had hands on the steel too - and none of them ever reported any melting. So, if you all have tons of molten steel, please share. Pictures would be a nice start.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

I'm definitely calling Poe's Law.

Dave

Yeah, you gotta be right.

 

[BigAl]

The "pyroclastic-like" dust clounds prove enormous heat. Some form of thermite-like detonation I guess

"like" is a simile. Twoofer English strikes again.

People don't survive a pyroclastic cloud.Thousands of people were engulfed by the smoke and dust on 9/11. Nobody at WTC died due to pyroclastic effects.

And according to us, we did find several tons of molten metal. So I dont know what you guys are talking about that this is a lie.

There was no molten steel found.

There are no first-hand eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile at WTC. All the reports are second-hand.

There is no physical evidence for molten steel on the pile.

There is no science that would show how the temperatures needed to maintain molten steel were created and maintained for weeks.

Given that there is no evidence and no science, we can dismiss the second-hand stories as hyperbole. Twoofer English fails again.

And of course the third reason is that there is no precedent of tall buildings
So statistically it must be very unlikely for 3 towers to fall down in one day.

And you have no understanding of statistics and are abusing the concepts of statistics and probability.

 

[triforcharity]

Look I should just remind you what the ae911truth policy is on fire, and the questions that really need to be asked. Just look at our web site.

If you look at the top 14 reasons to believe in CD, many of them are related to fire.

The "pyroclastic-like" dust clounds prove enormous heat. Some form of thermite-like detonation I guess

And according to us, we did find several tons of molten metal. So I dont know what you guys are talking about that this is a lie.

And of course the third reason is that there is no precedent of tall buildings So statistically it must be very unlikely for 3 towers to fall down in one day.

If you add in the thermite dust evidence, then the fire issues constitute 5 out of our 14 main reasons to believe in CD. These are the questions that ae911truth want answering. "Its the shout that will be heard around the world."

There is one part of that word that makes your conclusion completly nill and void.

It is the latin word for "Fire" btw, just in case you need to brush up on your language studies.

 

[triforcharity]

BigAl,

75% of statistics are made up.

 

[TruthersLie]

BigAl,

75% of statistics are made up.

And as the sage Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain) postulated. "There are lies, damn lies and statistics."

 

[NYCEMT86]

Look I should just remind you what the ae911truth policy is on fire, and the questions that really need to be asked. Just look at our web site.

We have answered them, you just choose to ignore them.

If you look at the top 14 reasons to believe in CD, many of them are related to fire.

All of which can be answered, but they refuse to listen.

The "pyroclastic-like" dust clounds prove enormous heat. Some form of thermite-like detonation I guess

This is old...no heat superheated gasses in the dust movement since people survived the dust flow.

And according to us, we did find several tons of molten metal. So I dont know what you guys are talking about that this is a lie.

What type of metal? Certain metals have lower melting points than others.

And of course the third reason is that there is no precedent of tall buildings So statistically it must be very unlikely for 3 towers to fall down in one day.

Yes and yet this still doesn't prove an inside job. Keep trying.

If you add in the thermite dust evidence, then the fire issues constitute 5 out of our 14 main reasons to believe in CD. These are the questions that ae911truth want answering. "Its the shout that will be heard around the world."

And yet after 8 years, nobody cares about the Truth Movement.

 

[PhantomWolf]

There is one part of that word that makes your conclusion completly nill and void.

It is the latin word for "Fire" btw, just in case you need to brush up on your language studies.

Just to be really picky, Pyroclastic means "Fire-Cloud" in latin, not just fire (which would be just "Pyro".)

 

[twinstead]

Just to be really picky, Pyroclastic means "Fire-Cloud" in latin, not just fire (which would be just "Pyro".)

In tri's defense, he did say he was talking about only part of the word

 

[PhantomWolf]

In tri's defense, he did say he was talking about only part of the word

Hmm, fair enough, he probably did mean that. To my waking up brain I was thinking two parts "Pryoclastic" and "like".

 

[jaydeehess]

Hmmm, one goes away for a few days and look what happens to this thread. I'd been lurking but not posting in this thread, prior to my vacation because I had nothing to add.

However, in recent days I noticed something that may not have been mentioned. In the Associated Press" article carried by the Edmonton Sun, about that natural gas explosion at the power plant in recent days, many people described how the explosion shook their houses even miles away. One woman saying that she thought "a tree had hit my house"!!

OMG!!! The spooks felled a tree on her house then spirited it away before she could run outside and see the smoke from the power plant and then reconstruct her assumptions of what had happened.
Obviously there was no actual gas explosion!

 

[BigAl]

MIDDLETOWN, Conn. The blast was heard at an estimated 50km.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hGj2gNQc3XMWovZP9HQeD4QTvpJgD9DORNU84



On a lighter note, maybe the writers at The Spoof read JREF.

Pants bomber says Iran used thermite in Connecticut gas blast
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i68521​

 

[jaydeehess]

The "pyroclastic-like" dust clounds prove enormous heat. Some form of thermite-like detonation I guess

Please provide a link to any indication that there were hundreds of severe burns to the onlookers caught in the 'pyroclastic clouds' of dust containing "enormous heat". I assume that some of them died from these injuries too?

And according to us, we did find several tons of molten metal. So I dont know what you guys are talking about that this is a lie.

Please provide the link stating that there were several tons of molten metal and then contrast this with the length of steel column used in the towers that would make up such a quantity.

And of course the third reason is that there is no precedent of tall buildings So statistically it must be very unlikely for 3 towers to fall down in one day

.

Well, you would have to include other significant parameters such as the number of high rise [/b]long span[/b] structures that have been on fore and how many of them had been hit by large aircraft with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel which became an acellerant and in a few seconds produced an office fire that would 'normally' take several hours to be generated.

Given that these very significant factors all make the statistical sample extremely small(once one includes impact damage its actually non-existant) it also reduces your arguement to absurdity.

If you add in the thermite dust evidence, then the fire issues constitute 5 out of our 14 main reasons to believe in CD. These are the questions that ae911truth want answering. "Its the shout that will be heard around the world."

Its the whimper that few even bother with.
"thermite dust evidence"? Sulphur? Is that it? Sulphur that is found in, among other things, ABS plumbing pipe and gyprock?

 

[beachnut]

Look I should just remind you what the ae911truth policy is on fire, ...

"ugh... fire good!"

 

[tfk]

JD,

Allow me to explain what you're not understanding...

Please provide a link to any indication that there were hundreds of severe burns to the onlookers caught in the 'pyroclastic clouds' of dust containing "enormous heat". I assume that some of them died from these injuries too?

What you're saying would be true for normal thermite. But not for SooperThermite.

You see, if you really need something to get really hot, but don't want it to stay hot, then there is the special "LTFHB" blend of SooperThermite. Especially designed to "Leave The Farking Heat Behind".

Please provide the link stating that there were several tons of molten metal and then contrast this with the length of steel column used in the towers that would make up such a quantity.

What you're saying would be true for normal thermite. But not for SooperThermite.

You see, if you really need lots of molten material, then there is the special "MYOMM" blend of SooperThermite. Especially designed to "Make Your Own Molten Material". At the request of the EPA, there was a special "Green" version of MYOMM that left no molten material residue that needs to be cleaned up (designated "MYOMM(G)"). It was quite the breakthrough. But you know the military has those huge R&D budgets...

Well, you would have to include other significant parameters such as the number of high rise long span structures that have been on fore and how many of them had been hit by large aircraft with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel which became an acellerant and in a few seconds produced an office fire that would 'normally' take several hours to be generated.

What you're saying would be true for normal thermite. But not for SooperThermite.

You see, if you really need a first time seen in years, then there is the special "NSIY(X)" blend of SooperThermite. Especially designed to produce physical effects "Not Seen In (X) Years", where "X" designates the number of years since last observance of the phenomenon. If you want a "First Time Ever" effect, then you'd simply add a LN ("Like Never") designator.

Given that these very significant factors all make the statistical sample extremely small (once one includes impact damage its actually non-existant) it also reduces your arguement to absurdity.

There are the -LP ("Low Probability"), -ELP ("Extra Low Probability") and -SLP ("Sooper Low Probability") variants.

Its the whimper that few even bother with.
"thermite dust evidence"? Sulphur? Is that it? Sulphur that is found in, among other things, ABS plumbing pipe and gyprock?

If you need an extra amount of some element, SooperThermite has special "X_ _" formulations. You simply insert the element symbol for the "_ _". For example, if you need extra Sulphur, you'd add "X-S". Extra Barium? "X-Ba".

If you need to eliminate an element from the residue for some reason, then you'd specify the "x _ _" (notice the SMALL "x") variant.

If you need the element to be around for a short period of time, then there is a "T" ("Temporary") variant.

There are currently 115 "X" variants, and 114 "x" variants (they are having trouble getting "Francium" to go away. It seems to stubbornly want to stick around, smoke & talk politics. There was talk of renaming element 87 to see if that would help, but "Europium" & even "Germanium" were already taken. And nobody liked "deGallium". Negotiations are currently at a standstill.)

From the characteristics that you've described, I think that it pretty clear that the towers were brought down with Military Grade SooperThermite of the -LTFHB -MYOMM(G) -NSIY(LN) -SLP -XS -xBa variety.

Glad I could help.

Tom

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Haven't we covered the subject about Thermite/Super Thermite a long time ago?

Truthers,

Please get with the times & reality. Alot of us don't have time to play games that aren't relevent to anything about 9/11. If you want to nit-pick about a tiny detail do so on your own time & stop wasting other peoples time with the same mindless BS that comes naturally to those who don't understand what really happened on 9/11.