DC
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,064
This story is from 2007?
the OP? no from April 2010
This story is from 2007?
Well if the Chavez fanbois say so it must be true!approval rating.
Pro Chavez:
dropped from 62% to 60%
http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/5049
opposition:
dropped to 47%
http://english.eluniversal.com/2010/04/08/en_pol_esp_poll:-hugo-chavezs_08A3710971.shtml
ratings most European politicans are dreaming of.
the OP? no from April 2010
Well if the Chavez fanbois say so it must be true!
And Ron Paul's polls always show him to be by far the most popular US politician ever.
Your NYT story was from 2007.
Anyway, if Chavez wants to spend billions on inferior Russian arms while grocery store shelves are bare that's what he should do. Maybe the poor Venezuelans can eat fighter planes.
Your NYT story was from 2007.
Anyway, if Chavez wants to spend billions on inferior Russian arms while grocery store shelves are bare that's what he should do. Maybe the poor Venezuelans can eat fighter planes.
How was it a lie? Does Venezuela spend more money on arms than any other Latin American country?and yes the NYtimes articel was from 2007. and like my post indicates i was merely pointing out the headline, wich was a lie.
How was it a lie? Does Venezuela spend more money on arms than any other Latin American country?
On 15 September 2009 US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that Venezuela’s recent arms acquisitions outpaced those of any other country in South America and raised questions about whether an arms race was looming in the region. While it is important to draw attention to disturbing military trends, identifying workable solutions to them depends on characterizing them correctly. So are Clinton’s fears justified?
Two recent events sharpened concerns about South American arms acquisitions: Venezuela’s plan to acquire air defence systems and battle tanks, supported by a $2.2 billion loan from Russia, and Brazil’s agreement with France, worth $12 billion, for a submarine development programme and for the construction of helicopters. Both were signed in September 2009.
The NYT story was in 2007. Brazil didn't sign the deal with France until 2009.
The NYT story was in 2007. Brazil didn't sign the deal with France until 2009.
Was it "lies and propaganda" in 2007, when the story was written?
How about you just show a factual error in the NYT story. Can you do that?and in case you want to do the NYTimes job, and backup their claims.
here ya go
yearbook2008.sipri.org/files/SIPRIYB08summary.pdf
but its a waste of time, because you cant backup their lie.
How about you just show a factual error in the NYT story. Can you do that?
Venezuela Spending on Arms Soars to World’s Top Ranks
yeah from over 60% to over 50% .
The 15 countries with the highest military
expenditure in 2007 in market exchange
rate terms
Rank Country Spending ($ b.) World share (%)
1 USA 547 45
2 UK 59.7 5
3 China 58.3 5
4 France 53.6 4
5 Japan 43.6 4
6 Germany 36.9 3
7 Russia 35.4 3
8 Saudi Arabia 33.8 3
9 Italy 33.1 3
10 India 24.2 2
11 South Korea 22.6 2
12 Brazil 15.3 1
13 Canada 15.2 1
14 Australia 15.1 1
15 Spain 14.6 1
yearbook2008.sipri.org/files/SIPRIYB08summary.pdf
and now compare to the title of the NYT.
CARACAS, Venezuela, Feb. 24 — Venezuela’s arms spending has climbed to more than $4 billion in the past two years, transforming the nation into Latin America’s largest weapons buyer and placing it ahead of other major purchasers in international arms markets like Pakistan and Iran.
Yet, it is still dropping even with his supporters polls. Month on month. Thats what I claimed and I was correct.
Care to comment on the state of the country? Or do you just ask me for stuff to ignore it? You just like to talk about made up stuff like stealing elections that I do not even claim?
yes and now deliver evidence to backup that claim. show me how they are anywhere near the WORLDS TOP spenders!!I'm gonna a cut you a break here and assume this was a mistake and not deliberate. The article was written in early 2007. It talks about spending in the previous 2 years. If you want to call the article lies then you have to look at the 2 year period prior to 2007. That would be 2005 and 2006.
OK?
Try again.
![]()