Another Chick Added To The Supreme Court

[Kthulhut Fhtagn]

Of course he knows her and her views. Afterall, she's a socialist.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Of course he knows her and her views. Afterall, she's a socialist.

I can only hope.

 

[fishbob]

I wonder, if the pick had been male, would the title of this thread be:

"Another Man/Dude Added To The Supreme Court"

Or does the sex of the person only come to the front of one's mind when it is female.

Is this one of those "It was just a [bad] joke" situations?

Just Scrut being a scrote.

 

[sphenisc]

I'm disappointed to find this isn't about Jack Chick.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm disappointed to find this isn't about Jack Chick.

I am too.

 

[ZirconBlue]

I agree with this. I would have liked to see Obama nominate Ann Williams of the 7th Circuit, who was rumored to be on the short list.

I would have liked to see him nominate Ann Wilson of Heart. Or maybe Nancy.

 

[BeAChooser]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2...ourt-justice-kagan-s-role-obamacare-defense-s

Washington, DC -- May 18, 2011

Judicial Watch … snip … announced today that it has obtained documents suggesting Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan helped coordinate the Obama administration’s legal defense of the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) while she served as Solicitor General. Kagan has said she was not involved in Department of Justice (DOJ) preparations for legal challenges to Obamacare. Moreover, the Supreme Court justice did not recuse herself from the High Court decision in April 2011 not to “fast-track” for Supreme Court review Virginia’s lawsuit challenging Obamacare.

The following are highlights from the documents obtained by Judicial Watch pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on February 24, 2011. … snip …

From this article (read all of it rather than just the quoted excerpt), it appears clear that Kagan and members of her staff LIED during the nomination process and hearings. So in my opinion, this lying socialist "chick" should now be IMPEACHED.

 

[A'isha]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2...ourt-justice-kagan-s-role-obamacare-defense-s


From this article (read all of it rather than just the quoted excerpt), it appears clear that Kagan and members of her staff LIED during the nomination process and hearings. So in my opinion, this lying socialist "chick" should now be IMPEACHED.

Oh My God! Elena Kagan received and sometimes forwarded emails saying that other people in the office she was in charge of were working on and meeting to discuss HCR legislation! And your link quotes CNS News!

Obviously a slam-dunk for impeachment.

 

[BeAChooser]

Oh My God! Elena Kagan received and sometimes forwarded emails saying that other people in the office she was in charge of were working on and meeting to discuss HCR legislation!

You shouldn't make your dishonesty so transparent. You should be more like the Obama adminstration and try to hide your dishonesty, ANTPogo. The documents indicate that Kagan herself was involved. As one of those emails stated: "Elena would definitely like OSG [Office of Solicitor General] to be involved in this set of issues…we will bring in Elena as needed." And even if it were only other people in her office who attended the meetings, Katyal told a Department of Justice investigator that "[Elena] has never been involved in any of it. I’ve run it for the office, and have never discussed the issues with her one bit.” Which based on the emails is an obvious lie. Afterall, there is an email chain entitled “Health care litigation meeting,” which references an “internal government meeting regarding the expected litigation”, where Kagan is both author and recipient in the chain. It's amazing the number of issues where you have your head in the sand, ANTPogo.

 

[Kopji]

Help me a little here. The documentation says that she was never asked about recusal during the questioning.

In this email exchange, Ms. Kagan and the White House
staff members formulated and revised a draft answer to an anticipated
question that Ms. Kagan might have been asked by Senators during the
confirmation process. The anticipated question and draft answer related to
Ms. Kagan’s recusal decisions as Solicitor General. OSG staff reviewed
the record of Ms. Kagan’s hearing before the Senate Committee on the
Judiciary, including the questions to the record posed by members of the
Committee, and ascertained that Ms. Kagan was not asked the question
contemplated in the email exchange and that Ms. Kagan did not provide
any version of the draft answer during the confirmation process.
pg 11-12

http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/mrc-kagan-vaughn-declaration-docs.pdf

Bold mine. And this just a question. This seems to imply that no lie took place because the question was never asked if she would recuse herself or not.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2...ourt-justice-kagan-s-role-obamacare-defense-s


From this article (read all of it rather than just the quoted excerpt), it appears clear that Kagan and members of her staff LIED during the nomination process and hearings. So in my opinion, this lying socialist "chick" should now be IMPEACHED.

EXECUTE her first, then IMPEACH her.

 

[DavidJames]

So in my opinion, this lying socialist "chick" should now be IMPEACHED.

Edited by jhunter1163: 

Edited for Rule 12.