The Central Scrutinizer
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2001
- Messages
- 53,099
Scalia and Thomas have exactly the same thing to drink.
Thomas doesn't speak a word...
Scalia and Thomas have exactly the same thing to drink.
I'll thank you to google your lesbians behind closed doors, fella.A bit of googling hints that she is a lesbian. We'll see.
Thomas doesn't speak a word...
No, no. They need to walk into a bar.Three Jews and Six Catholics would be sitting on the Court.
Grr. Serves me right for not reading the entire thread first.They all walk into a bar....
The opposition didn't lose consecutively. Kagan's side lost in district court, won in the circuit and then lost again in the Supreme Court.
Anyway, let's look at what I said:
Not the bold part. I followed that with:
Okay, I stand corrected on the order of wins and losses. Still, my point stands that "annihilated" is hyperbolic.
Well, she could have lost in the Appellate Court, too. The Appellate decision was a split decision, 2-1. So, all in all, 10 judges disagreed with her and two agreed. Not a great record, but at least she can say that two sitting judges agreed with her.
You get a feeling that lot of the people who are opposed to the Military Recruting on Campus just don't like the military, and it it was not the gay issue they would find another reason to want to kick the military off campus.
If just about any company can come and recruit on campus, why not the US Military?
If just about any company can come and recruit on campus, why not the US Military?
You get a feeling that lot of the people who are opposed to the Military Recruting on Campus just don't like the military, and it it was not the gay issue they would find another reason to want to kick the military off campus.
Every time I see this thread, I can't help but think 'Obama nominated Jack Chick?'
Is the US Military "just another company?"
You heard correctly. Three Jews and Six Catholics would be sitting on the Court.