The Central Scrutinizer
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2001
- Messages
- 53,099
Maybe not judicial experience in the narrow definition of the term, but someone with Solicitor General experience would seem eminently qualified.Chick or no, I'm not sure I like the fact she has no judicial experience.
Okay, I'll start. She must be a socialist. Hasn't she been employed by government?Demonization in 5......4.....3.....2....
Demonization in 5......4.....3.....2....
That's two of us. Bush had a lady he appointed who had no bench experience, not sure how her resume and this latest "chick" compare, but I was grateful when she was taken off the list.Chick or no, I'm not sure I like the fact she has no judicial experience.
Aren't we past that?I am curious whether any member of the Senate Judiciary Committee will ask her, directly or indirectly, about her sexual orientation.
I am not curious about her sexual orientation, mind you; I am curious as to whether any of the Senators will have the stunningly bad taste to bring up the issue in a public hearing.
Her and that looser Earl Warren.Chick or no, I'm not sure I like the fact she has no judicial experience.
I am curious whether any member of the Senate Judiciary Committee will ask her, directly or indirectly, about her sexual orientation.
I am not curious about her sexual orientation, mind you; I am curious as to whether any of the Senators will have the stunningly bad taste to bring up the issue in a public hearing.
Kagan... sounds Jewish. Clearly a puppet of the Israel lobby and the NWO.
Terrible choice.