That isn't what I, or Coulter, said.
Coulter did not confuse the draft with registering for Selective Service. You did.
Zig.
Zig Ziglar?
That isn't what I, or Coulter, said.
Zig.
Truth gives you butthurt?
Coulter did not confuse the draft with registering for Selective Service. You did.
Zig Ziglar?
What is Selective Service for? That's right, I remember. It's for the draft.
Coulter did not confuse the draft with registering for Selective Service. You did.
"Adopted in 1971 at the tail end of the Worst Generation's anti-war protests, the argument for allowing children to vote was that 18-year-olds could drink and be conscripted into the military, so they ought to be allowed to vote."
Truth gives you butthurt?



Is it true that Skanky Ann was a guy who had a sex change operation?
Did you know that a sex change operation from man to woman is only about half the cost of the sex change operation from woman to man?
Did you know that the sex change operation from woman to man is called an addadictomy?


If I could make it so, only people over 21 who actually pay income tax, and/or are serving in the armed forces, would be eligible to vote.
What's not to like?The horrible thing is I believe you would.
What's not to like?
All I can say is ...
How's that hopey changey thing workin out for ya?![]()
I must agree with you on this one. You were wrong about what constitutes owning a house v. owning it "free and clear," but registering for a potential draft does not mean there is one.You are still confused. It is a registration should there be another draft. The fact that those who have registered for selective service have not been drafted should have been the tipoff that there isn't any draft. Difficult to make it any clearer than that.
And who are these folks who in your estimation argue these points well?
What's not to like?
None of those things necessarily stop one from paying income tax; 18-20 yr olds can join the military if they feel their need to vote outways their need to party as they ignore reality.The contraction of enfranchisement. I am against removing the vote from retirees, those between 18-20, and those who make their money through capital gains, those who are unemployed temporarily or not, and so on.
None of those things necessarily stop one from paying income tax; 18-20 yr olds can join the military if they feel their need to vote outways their need to party as they ignore reality.
Well, you do not speak for a lot of disabled working class retired soldiers who helped build what the useless class has eaten up with their Wall Street Ponzi schemes.I feel I can speak for all US citizens by noting dumb Canucks (and even smart ones) don't, anyway .... Eh?