From an architectural history POV, showing that various cultures developed corbelled vaulting is like marveling that so many cultures started using a post-and-lintel system, or making containers out of clay.
well I was going to post pictures of the burial vaults of all the thousands of cultures that didn't get as far as working out corbelling, but theres been a problem
![]()
Nobody went strait for arches?
Its currently the paradigm that the arch developed from corbelling, so to answer your question
errr No
![]()
anyone know of any similarities that can't be easily explained ?
The use of swords?
Obsidian ones sounds like a rather perverse engineering feat when compared to bronze or iron/steel.
I have just read up a bit on it, those obsidian "sword" were quite effective and must have been worth the effort to make them.
As for the warfare it seems that the prisoner taking happened mostly after the battle as an alternative to cutting down the fleeing losers.
Sorry your dietyship, I should have said it was meant for KotA, I ask in the name of Ast and Hetheru that you extend mercy upon me.
Form follows function, would be my first suggestion. Of course, IANAE.
The Egyptians give the biggest clue to why the arch isnt universal, they used it in tombs and in small constructions but never for temples. I'm guessing that Arch's don't do too well when the earth shakes or when its being attacked. It wasn't until the invention of concrete that it had enough stability for larger projectsIn terms of art, the usual woo suspects trotted out are the (very superficial) similarities in motifs between the NWPC peoples (Tlingit, Haida, Kwakiutl) and the Olmec and (eek) the Shang and now Sanxingdui finds. (ETA: and the Ainu-- between them and the NWPC might not be TOO far fetched)
Does the fact that the "true" arch was so NON-universal in ancient cultures put a big damper on claims of far-flung geographical dispersions? If corbelling and trabeate architecture was dispersed in that way, why not the arch?
Obsidian's awesome and you sort of just find it on the ground-- smelting metal is crazy complicated. Catal Huyuk made its fortunes on obsidian trade (as Marduk noted there WAS a lot of obsidian use in Eurasia, but maybe not sword-sized chunks. Were Mesoamerican obsidian swords "common" or ritual?)
they were effective against other people armed with obsidian swords, spanish steel, plate armour and cannon not so much, and iirc they were only wielded by noblemen. They were notoriously fragile as well, you couldn't go through a prolongued battle and expect them to last
At least when it broke, you would still have sharp pieces you could cut someone with. Of course, as the battle went on, it would become closer and closer-quarter fighting...![]()
Somewhat off-topic, but the same principle holds true in biological evolution: convergence.
Organisms that have to deal with the same type of environment end up with similar-looking adaptations. Eyes are extremely useful and have evolved many times. Fish, marine mammals and marine birds (penguins) all have similar body shapes and appendages.
But there are three of them.... OMG the triple breasted whore of Eroticon Six visited ancient Egypt!
Don't let that hold you back, after all IANAP.
![]()