Cont: All things Trump + Russia Part 3

[Childlike Empress]

If you can ever figure out what it is that you are bitching about, then please let the rest of us know.

It seems like you are trapped in some strange loop. There isn't a "rest of us", it's only you. And you seem to have forgotten how to parse basic English. For your orientation, I would guess it is the 11th time you used that confused return on me now.

 

[Crossbow]

It seems like you are trapped in some strange loop. There isn't a "rest of us", it's only you. And you seem to have forgotten how to parse basic English. For your orientation, I would guess it is the 11th time you used that confused return on me now.

In case you have not noticed, your postings can be seen by literally everyone who has access to the Forum. Therefore, there is an "us".

In any event, you have bitching about a subject where you get your information from crap sources of information. And now you are bitching about a book that you have not even read.

So if you can ever figure out just what it is that you are bitching about, then please let the rest of us know.

 

[Childlike Empress]

^ makes the dozen full, which is when Trump will be brought down by pre$$titutes as Killary announced in Russian language in a cave under a pizza booth in DC two years to the day ago.

 

[Ambrosia]

you seem to have forgotten how to parse basic English.

^ makes the dozen full, which is when Trump will be brought down by pre$$titutes as Killary announced in Russian language in a cave under a pizza booth in DC two years to the day ago.

Any chance of you using basic English in your posts?

calling people stupid names, 'edgily' altering names by switching letters for $¥m&õ£$ and using portmanteau just makes you look childish.

I'd also recommend looking into some better quality source material if you'd prefer to be taken seriously.

 

[Polaris]

Any chance of you using basic English in your posts?

calling people stupid names, 'edgily' altering names by switching letters for $¥m&õ£$ and using portmanteau just makes you look childish.

I'd also recommend looking into some better quality source material if you'd prefer to be taken seriously.

Translation of CE's posts: Russia is always right and good, Western press is always lying (and well paid for it, too), and Western leaders are always criminals and murderers unless they suck Putin's ****.

 

[Crossbow]

^ makes the dozen full, which is when Trump will be brought down by pre$$titutes as Killary announced in Russian language in a cave under a pizza booth in DC two years to the day ago.

Instead of posting gibberish try making sense.

Or as I have said before:

If you can ever figure out what it is that you are bitching about, then please let the rest of us know.

 

[LSSBB]

Any chance of you using basic English in your posts?

calling people stupid names, 'edgily' altering names by switching letters for $¥m&õ£$ and using portmanteau just makes you look childish.

I'd also recommend looking into some better quality source material if you'd prefer to be taken seriously.

I have two words to.assist in interpretation.

"No planer"

For further research into this peculiar world view, please consult the 9/11 Conspiracy sub-forum

 

[CapelDodger]

No, he stole material from the subversive English-language Moscow-based eXile magazine back in the days when he was The Guardian's Moscow correspondent and published it there under his name. It was so obvious that the propaganda rag even apologized. Harding then fled Moscow in a hilarious nervous breakdown (he wasn't "kicked out" like he claims in the video).

You didn't wtiness that "hilarious nervous breakdown", did you? You just read about it and clutched it to your breast. Not just because it denigrates the author, and so, by your lights, discredits the book, but because it actually gives you pleasure to hear and believe it. Be honest, it does, doesn't it?

 

[CapelDodger]

I have two words to.assist in interpretation.

"No planer"

For further research into this peculiar world view, please consult the 9/11 Conspiracy sub-forum

I suspect the "no collusion" movement will have similar longevity.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Any chance of you using basic English in your posts?

calling people stupid names, 'edgily' altering names by switching letters for $¥m&õ£$ and using portmanteau just makes you look childish.

I'd also recommend looking into some better quality source material if you'd prefer to be taken seriously.

Thanks for your concern. If you are unable to decipher my humour in response to the parrots, I recommend you stick to my "source material" to learn something, as the "source material" of the parrots is what has apparently deceived you in the first place and constantly emerges from every medium you likely use in addition to these fine threads.

 

[Childlike Empress]

You didn't wtiness that "hilarious nervous breakdown", did you? You just read about it and clutched it to your breast. Not just because it denigrates the author, and so, by your lights, discredits the book, but because it actually gives you pleasure to hear and believe it. Be honest, it does, doesn't it?

I witnessed it as it is still on the Guardian website in all its "enemy of the state" glory. And I wouldn't enjoy it if I would take it seriously and wouldn't know what he was up to before (including stealing Ames and Taibbi's work). He's a "hack in the purest sense" as I think Assange called him. Or "story teller" as he called himself in the video interview I posted.

 

[phiwum]

I witnessed it as it is still on the Guardian website in all its "enemy of the state" glory. And I wouldn't enjoy it if I would take it seriously and wouldn't know what he was up to before (including stealing Ames and Taibbi's work). He's a "hack in the purest sense" as I think Assange called him. Or "story teller" as he called himself in the video interview I posted.

Ah, so you read that and inferred, all by your lonesome, a hilarious nervous breakdown rather than what the article explicitly said.

Which makes your clinging to this description even more pathetic than had you read it elsewhere and wanted to believe.

 

[Crossbow]

Thanks for your concern. If you are unable to decipher my humour in response to the parrots, I recommend you stick to my "source material" to learn something, as the "source material" of the parrots is what has apparently deceived you in the first place and constantly emerges from every medium you likely use in addition to these fine threads.

Do yourself a favor by writing posts that that actually make sense as opposed to posting stupid crap that you find to be amusing.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Ah, so you read that and inferred, all by your lonesome, a hilarious nervous breakdown rather than what the article explicitly said.

Rule of so. Ever heard of eXile? I read his breakdown in context when it happened. And you are mouthing off about something you never heard of before, just because you feel insecure about the boomerang. I'm here for you to feel better.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Do yourself a favor by writing posts that that actually make sense as opposed to posting stupid crap that you find to be amusing.

Don't tell me what to do, buddy. Why would that do me a favour (forgot about that English thing already?) anyway? Writing posts that make sense to you? And I don't find amusing? Sound like a crappy plan to me.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Perhaps you could explain what you think the significance of your latest line of posting is, Empress? So far you linked to an interview with the author of a book that says things you disagree with, then you've said that the author is a plagiarist, and that he had a mental break down in the past. Okay, so what? Nobody had mentioned him before you brought him up. If everything in that book is plagiarised or is something he invented, what significance would that have to anything that's going on?

It seems to me that the only real take away, if we take every post of yours at face value and accept all the arguments therein, is not to cite this particular author as a cite. Okay, nobody will going forwards, just as nobody did before you brought him up. So what?

 

[Crossbow]

Don't tell me what to do, buddy. Why would that do me a favour (forgot about that English thing already?) anyway? Writing posts that make sense to you? And I don't find amusing? Sound like a crappy plan to me.

In the first place, I did not tell you what to do. Instead, I gave you some advice on how to avoid writing crap postings.

There is a substantial difference between these two concepts.

In the second place, you can expect me to continue to call out crap when I see it.

 

[Upchurch]

With the holidays, I've fallen behind in my lurking.

I take it there are folks who don't believe that the Trump campaign was working with the Russians, but are any still denying that there was contact between the two? Is anyone denying that the Russians were actively helping the Trump campaign and the GOP in general?

 

[BobTheCoward]

With the holidays, I've fallen behind in my lurking.

I take it there are folks who don't believe that the Trump campaign was working with the Russians, but are any still denying that there was contact between the two? Is anyone denying that the Russians were actively helping the Trump campaign and the GOP in general?

The primary groups making those arguments (intelligence agencies) do not present all their evidence in an open and honest way. So I dismiss their argument until they do.

 

[Crossbow]

With the holidays, I've fallen behind in my lurking.

I take it there are folks who don't believe that the Trump campaign was working with the Russians, but are any still denying that there was contact between the two? Is anyone denying that the Russians were actively helping the Trump campaign and the GOP in general?

As far as I can tell, even the ardent Trump supporters have conceded the now obvious fact that there were at least a few highly placed people in the Trump campaign who were in collusion with the Russians in order to help Trump win the election.

However, since there is no 'smoking gun' (as least one has not been discovered thus far) which shows that Trump himself was in collusion with the Russians, therefore the ardent Trump supporters like to claim that there was not any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

I know that the logic of the Trump supporters is rather odd, but that is the best sense that I can make of it.