Status
Not open for further replies.
You talk about circumstantial evidence is piling up because you lack direct evidence or strong circumstantial evidence. It would be real nice if you could present that.

Are you missing the point on purpose? That circumstantial evidence is why Mueller's investigation needs to run to completion.
 
Are you missing the point on purpose? That circumstantial evidence is why Mueller's investigation needs to run to completion.

I'm making a related point. It would be really nice if you had better evidence right now. I thought that was a point you would agree with.

I don't know if I have given an opinion on the investigation.
 
I'm making a related point. It would be really nice if you had better evidence right now. I thought that was a point you would agree with.

I don't know if I have given an opinion on the investigation.

Yeah, "related points" are your specialty.
 
The Guardian propagandist Luke Harding went on The Real News to talk about his new book "Collusion". I posted a critical review last week. I don't think it was a good idea for Luke to go where real journalists, not "story-tellers" live, but maybe it looks differently from another perspective. Half an hour:


And did you actually read the book Collusion?

Or are you once again simply parroting other stupid sources?
 
And did you actually read the book Collusion?

Or are you once again simply parroting other stupid sources?


Hahaha, reading a Luke Harding book? Dude, you must be joking. That guy has quite a history (that I know and you apparently don't) which makes it absolutely revealing that he is still allowed to write for the Guardian. They should have kicked him out after he stole real journalists' work back in Moscow before he had his paranoid breakdown. Ask Mark Ames. Could have been their last apology for that clown. As I mentioned earlier, that's the man who caused all the Manning cables landing on the internet unredacted after he printed the password in one of his other laughable books, making money off of wikileaks. Keep that in mind while you watch his freaky visage squirm in the video. ;):rolleyes:
 
Hahaha, reading a Luke Harding book? Dude, you must be joking. That guy has quite a history (that I know and you apparently don't) which makes it absolutely revealing that he is still allowed to write for the Guardian. They should have kicked him out after he stole real journalists' work back in Moscow before he had his paranoid breakdown. Ask Mark Ames. Could have been their last apology for that clown. As I mentioned earlier, that's the man who caused all the Manning cables landing on the internet unredacted after he printed the password in one of his other laughable books, making money off of wikileaks. Keep that in mind while you watch his freaky visage squirm in the video. ;):rolleyes:

Unlike you, I actually did read the book and I thought that it was quite good.

Therefore, if you can ever manage to figure out what it is that you are bitching about, then please let the rest of us know.
 
Hahaha, reading a Luke Harding book? Dude, you must be joking. That guy has quite a history (that I know and you apparently don't) which makes it absolutely revealing that he is still allowed to write for the Guardian. They should have kicked him out after he stole real journalists' work back in Moscow before he had his paranoid breakdown. Ask Mark Ames. Could have been their last apology for that clown. As I mentioned earlier, that's the man who caused all the Manning cables landing on the internet unredacted after he printed the password in one of his other laughable books, making money off of wikileaks. Keep that in mind while you watch his freaky visage squirm in the video. ;):rolleyes:

Sorry, I haven't been watching the RT History channel -- are you implying that Harding stole the Collusion stuff from some other journalist?
 
I thought bringing up the past work and honesty of people being cited was "weakmindedness", nothing but an "ad hominem" and "sinking to their level"? Seems that's only true when the person being spoken about is someone Childlike Empress agrees with.
 
I thought bringing up the past work and honesty of people being cited was "weakmindedness", nothing but an "ad hominem" and "sinking to their level"? Seems that's only true when the person being spoken about is someone Childlike Empress agrees with.

Seconded!

While I have by no means examined every posting that 'Childlike Empress' has ever made, however I have noticed that every time she issues a citation to support her various ideas, the citation is always crap.

It sure is a shame that even in this day and age, there are still people who refuse to learn that crap information does not somehow turn crap conclusions into valid conclusions.
 
Unlike you, I actually did read the book and I thought that it was quite good.


:sdl: No surprise there. I suspect some others who have been quiet had it under the Christmas tree as well. After all the cover says "#1 NYT bestseller". Which is why I posted about him in the first place. If this and that creative writing twitter guru are your best informers, good luck in 2018. You'll need it.
 
You "reviewed" a book you haven't read?

That puts you in the same class as fundi religious wackos who protest against movies they've never seen.

Good company for you.


I didn't review it. I posted a review of it, and I posted a half an hour interview with the author by a guy who admits in the interview that he didn't read the book as well. Somehow it still doesn't go like Luke expected, and I invite you to claim that it was a technically bad interview. I can post a couple of reviews of the interview, if you want. Just none with that opinion. Not even close. Half an hour of Luke in person is just worth 23 million Russian trolls. Putin could raise the minimum wage again now with all that spared money.
 
Sorry, I haven't been watching the RT History channel -- are you implying that Harding stole the Collusion stuff from some other journalist?


No, he stole material from the subversive English-language Moscow-based eXile magazine back in the days when he was The Guardian's Moscow correspondent and published it there under his name. It was so obvious that the propaganda rag even apologized. Harding then fled Moscow in a hilarious nervous breakdown (he wasn't "kicked out" like he claims in the video).
 
:sdl: No surprise there. I suspect some others who have been quiet had it under the Christmas tree as well. After all the cover says "#1 NYT bestseller". Which is why I posted about him in the first place. If this and that creative writing twitter guru are your best informers, good luck in 2018. You'll need it.

Good luck with what? Indicting some more TrumpCo people? I'd guess that Mueller doesn't need their help. Convincing most Americans that the Trump/Russian connection stinks? Done. Winning Congress? They don't need luck to win the House, at least, and that will be enough to stop the "Trump agenda" until 2020, even without impeachment.

But good luck with Mark Basile finding those thermite chips in 2018.
 
No, he stole material from the subversive English-language Moscow-based eXile magazine back in the days when he was The Guardian's Moscow correspondent and published it there under his name. It was so obvious that the propaganda rag even apologized. Harding then fled Moscow in a hilarious nervous breakdown (he wasn't "kicked out" like he claims in the video).

And your point is... ? No Collusion?
 
:sdl: No surprise there. I suspect some others who have been quiet had it under the Christmas tree as well. After all the cover says "#1 NYT bestseller". Which is why I posted about him in the first place. If this and that creative writing twitter guru are your best informers, good luck in 2018. You'll need it.

If you can ever figure out what it is that you are bitching about, then please let the rest of us know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom