• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ahmedinajad Quotes about Israel

bin Laden actually distanced himself from the US support efforts.

And the US brought in actual support. We taught the mujaheddin how to hit and run. you know, actually survive encounters with the Soviets. we didn't give them a Semtex vest and to the men and chunk of money to their soon to be widows.

Also, the US stressed hitting military targets, not shopping centers.

Not to mention that Afghanistan was actually a country and not target practice for Egyptian and Syrian ordinance.
 
Was America cowardly when she provided the Afghan fighters with weapons to fight the Russians in a proxy war?
We didn't want to risk a nuclear war with the Soviets which had the potential to pretty much end all human life on the planet. There were plenty of covert US agents on the ground in Afghanistan.
 
... and training.

Some those fighters called the 'Afghan Arabs' were Bin Ladan and Zawahiri of course.
The US did not fund or train any of the Arab fighters in Afghanistan.

But it's good of you to write freely, the more you do so the more your ignorance is exposed.
 
You're one to talk about being in the closet about one's political beliefs.

And why is that then parky? What closet political beliefs do I have?

This should be a good one? I'm a closet believer in parliamentary democracy? or. I'm a closet criticizer of Anrachism?

Let's hear it parky.
 
The US did not fund or train any of the Arab fighters in Afghanistan.

But it's good of you to write freely, the more you do so the more your ignorance is exposed.

Didn't they? Well Milton Bearden, the CIA Field Officer for Afghanistan during those times talks of his dealings with them in the BBC Documentary. 'The Power of Nightmares'. It's in part2. You can hear it from the horses mouth.

Edited by Lisa Simpson: 
Edited to remove personal remarks.


Please keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use personal attacks to argue your point.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still waiting for someone to actually refute these quotes. I guess we all know he did actually say these things.

Though Tim has taken the interesting tactic of instead of refuting their legitimacy, stating that while they may be true, they are irrelevant due to Ahmedinajad's actual influence in Iran.

I would like to think that if he actually has little power in Iran, and was just a noisy yet powerless figurehead, the CIA and Mossad would be well aware of that.

Yet somehow, for some reason, they seem to think his views and statements are dangerous.

I'll be honest, I don't complete trust the Mossad. But I do trust our CIA. I have seen ZERO evidence that even some far off wing of the CIA considers Iran to be nothing to worry about. Even before the Iraq War started, we knew about CIA doubts about WMDs in Iraq.
 
bin Laden actually distanced himself from the US support efforts.

its' certainly true that Bin laden and Zawahiri weren't the best of friends with the US.

And the US brought in actual support. We taught the mujaheddin how to hit and run. you know, actually survive encounters with the Soviets. we didn't give them a Semtex vest and to the men and chunk of money to their soon to be widows.

Also, the US stressed hitting military targets, not shopping centers.

Evidence?

Not to mention that Afghanistan was actually a country and not target practice for Egyptian and Syrian ordinance.

And?
 
Still waiting for someone to actually refute these quotes. I guess we all know he did actually say these things.

Though Tim has taken the interesting tactic of instead of refuting their legitimacy, stating that while they may be true, they are irrelevant due to Ahmedinajad's actual influence in Iran.

What tactic. I refuted the legitimacy of the 'Wipte of the map' BS because I know that not to be true. I don't know if the above quotes are legitimate or not.

I dod knwo the extent of Ahmedeunjad's power though. Its' no secret


I would like to think that if he actually has little power in Iran, and was just a noisy yet powerless figurehead, the CIA and Mossad would be well aware of that.

Well of course the CIA and Mossad are aware of that. Why shouldn't they be?

Yet somehow, for some reason, they seem to think his views and statements are dangerous.

Oh dear. They're are telling you his views and statements are dangerous because it's a spin tool. Surely you are not blind to the PR game parky?

I'll be honest, I don't complete trust the Mossad. But I do trust our CIA. I have seen ZERO evidence that even some far off wing of the CIA considers Iran to be nothing to worry about. Even before the Iraq War started, we knew about CIA doubts about WMDs in Iraq.

You trust the CIA?

:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
 
Reported for personal attacks.

Counter reported for false reporting and pedantry.

Come on Parky, I've been called an anti-semite hundreds of times by you, Skeptic, gtc, abenja, and others. I've reported I think one of those, which was a particularly venomous bunch of attacks by Skeptic soon after I first joined this forum.

Do you now want me to report every time you ADL police cadets call me an anti-semite. After all that's a defamatory personal attack because there' no evidence of it whatsoever.

NO won't report you I'll just laugh at you.

Surely most of us have the maturity to fight our own battles without crying to the mods for something so insignificant
 
Well of course the CIA and Mossad are aware of that. Why shouldn't they be?

Oh dear. They're are telling you his views and statements are dangerous because it's a spin tool. Surely you are not blind to the PR game parky?

I know, as a truther this may be difficult to comprehend, and your response will most likely be something to the extant of "I don't have to prove anything..you have to prove I am wrong".......but...

Do you have any evidence for your above statements?

:jaw-dropp:eek::confused::o:(:crowded:
 
Counter reported for false reporting and pedantry.

Calling someone ignorant is a personal attack. I strongly believe that this forum should be free of personal attacks. You are free to report any personal attacks as well. I urge you to in fact.
 
Calling someone ignorant is a personal attack. [/qoute]

No 'ignorance' means they don't hold certain knowledge. We are all ignorant of something. it wasn't a personal attack at all

I strongly believe that this forum should be free of personal attacks.

Then why keep churning out the same old "anti-semite" attacks then?

You are free to report any personal attacks as well. I urge you to in fact.

Although I've reported a couple I prefer the adult approach of tackling them myself
 
I know, as a truther this may be difficult to comprehend, and your response will most likely be something to the extant of "I don't have to prove anything..you have to prove I am wrong".......but...

Do you have any evidence for your above statements?

:jaw-dropp:eek::confused::o:(:crowded:

The political structure of Iran is no secret. If the CIA and Mossad were unaware of the limit of Ahmedinejad's power then they would be pretty ignorant. I do not believe the CIA and Mossad are ignorant.
 
And now back to the topic.

It has been argued by "some" that Ahmedinajad has no violent intentions towards Israel...and only seeks its administrative and political dissalusion. I believe the quotes in the OP prove this to be wrong.
 
And now back to the topic.

It has been argued by "some" that Ahmedinajad has no violent intentions towards Israel...and only seeks its administrative and political dissalusion. I believe the quotes in the OP prove this to be wrong.

Like many people who are ignorant of the Iranian political system ...

I respect the Iranian people, but this man cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. If the West doesn't have the stomach for the job...the Jews will handle it.

Ahmedinejad can never have a nuclear weapon. Even if Iran ever developed such a weapon Ahmedinejad would have no power to use it.

And Ahmedinejad will be out of office this year. So there isn't generally any importance on what he says except for propaganda purposes to fire people up against Iran.



And what do you mean by the "Jews Will handle It? Is their going to be a mass coming together of Jews across the world to attack Iran.

And you talk of Ahmedinejad having violent intentions towards Israel. It think the opposite is certainly true. if anyone attacks anyone it will be ISrael attacking Iran and not the other way around, so it's obvious who is the agressor here.
 
Ahmedinajad is one of the worlds greatest leaders.

He has the guts to tell the truth about Israel and the Zionist Nazis.
Considering he is a Holocaust denier, is that an insult or a compliment towards the state of Israel?
 
Considering Ahmadinejad has stated his views repeatedly?

You should read your sources before linking to them.


I couldn't find any of what you would call 'repeatedly' from Armedinejad. and neither does your article, which is a transparent politically bias piece of rhetoric, provide a correct translation.

Armedinejad's jave been translated properly by experienced Farsi speakers and been shown that his "Wipe Israel off the Map" was nonsense.

And as I've pointed above, the guy is insignificant. he's out of officet his year and didn't and would never have had the power over IRan's military and nukes.

These facts show the huge failings of the Western propaganda in their use of Armedinejad statements. Although obviously some are fooled by the spin, it doesn't take much effort to tear it apart as being BS
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom