Adm: I desperately need help

The Don said:
[mode = pedant] I think you mean sewage. Sewerage is the network of pipes in which sewage is carried[/mode]
I sit corrected. :)
 
Qureshi1_78 said:
If this is your claim then you would be having no hesitation of taking cyanide 2x? Don't you? :con2:
Even reading and comprehension escapes you, doesn't it...

At this point you have earned a priviledged position in the pantheon of people I refer to as "raving nutters". Right up there with the leader of the troupe, Gene Ray. There's little point in putting you on Ignore - what's to ignore? My only real concern from here on in is that JREF is continuing to burn up electrons to showcase your idiocies. I only hope that you serve as an object lesson in How NOT To Be A Homeopath.
 
Qureshi1_78 said:
If this is your claim then you would be having no hesitation of taking cyanide 2x? Don't you? :con2:
Qureshi: So you are talking about the dose-dependent effect of cyanide?

Yes, there is a dose-dependent effect of cyanide. We can agree on that. Now, please continue.

Hans
 
Sooo, the evil skeptics are willing to drink 30C cyanide? Then ask them about 6C!!

Oops, they are willing to drink that, too! Surely it must be possible to scare them into admitting the wonderful magical effect of homoeopathy! Try 2C of cyanide!

Better yet, try 1C or even 0C! Then there will be no skeptics left! Hahahahaha!!
 
Rolfe said:
One of the reasons I'm here is that I want to debate with the sort of homoeopath who is capable of having a rational discussion.............Thus, I'm reliant on some suitable homoeopathic company turning up here.

Rolfe.

Here I am. The problem is that a number of people have already launched a campaign to get me booted off the forum.

Zep in particular.

(although i am not a homeopath, instead, a person who knows that ultra-dilute solutions are bioactive and I have the evidence)
 
I will be the first to admit that homeopathy sounds as goofy as all heck.

But just because something sounds crazy does not mean it IS crazy.

History is overfowing with numerous examples of scientific discovery being unmercifully ridiculed only to later be accepted as fact.

The in vitro studies and Louis Rey's thermoluminescence is where you will discover the truth once you eliminate your bias.
 
Olaf/QII said:
Here I am.
Don't flatter yourself. You couldn't manage a sane conversation on H'pathy (load of screaming about Kleijnen, Boissel and Linde, degenerating into "The Queen of England" and "100,000 medical doctors", before going completely off-planet into some Himalayan monks, as I recall), and so far you've been even less rational here.

Bugger off, Qlafxangold.

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:


Bugger off, Qlafxangold.

Rolfe.

you tell me to get lost, yet all you do is bring me up (or at least who you think i am).

I am none of those that you think; however, i am here to expose you to the truth of ultra-dilute solutions as long as the powers that be let me stay.

Admit it, you NEED me!!!
 
Olaf/QII said:
History is overfowing with numerous examples of scientific discovery being unmercifully ridiculed only to later be accepted as fact.
... but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
 
Rolfe said:
One of the reasons I'm here is that I want to debate with the sort of homoeopath who is capable of having a rational discussion.............Thus, I'm reliant on some suitable homoeopathic company turning up here.


Rolfe.

This is just classic. I need to start a separate file of Rolfe quotes that I can refer back to from time to time.

A freudian analyst could have a field day with this comment.

She is "reliant". I love it!!!

I fulfill rolfe's needs!!! glad to be of service.

The only problem is that I think my studies scare her (why else would she launch into the personal attacks on their characters); she prefers the easypickings of ( i won't name names).
 
Olaf/QII said:
You need me Rolfe, you need me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, I imagine she has a wobbly table that needs something thin and dense like you she can wedge under its foot to prop it up straight...

Incidentally, when are you going to share with us these fabulous revelations you claim you have? I don't mean the now thoroughly debunked Ennis stuff you keep rattling on about. Maybe she has something new we can read instead of that? Hmmm?
 
MRC_Hans said:
:roll: ...Reminds me of "A day at the races": "I don't like the part about 'the party of the foist part'" - "OK, we'll take that away [rrrip!]. Now, the party of the second part...." etc..

Hans

With homeopathy you have to take out the 'Sanity Clause' :)

Go on, you know you want to. :)
 
delphi_ote said:
Yea. Then he could look up "sexism" and "misogyny!"
Er, I'm about 80% sure that Xanta is female. (I like the "Ofal" appellation, but since she's been Xanta for so long on the H'pathy forums and it seems to be the one relative constant in a well-stuffed sock drawer, I'm inclined to stick with it.)

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:
Er, I'm about 80% sure that Xanta is female. (I like the "Ofal" appellation, but since she's been Xanta for so long on the H'pathy forums and it seems to be the one relative constant in a well-stuffed sock drawer, I'm inclined to stick with it.)
Actually, I find the choice of "Nerr" as a name intriguing. I haven't heard this word used for rather a long time, but when I was at school it was a (rather juvenile) expression of derision and/or ridicule, generally used by rather stupid people of about 15 and under to indicate that they thought they had won an argument (as in "So nerr!"), or just in general taunting (as in "Nerr nerr ni nerr nerr").
 
Rolfe said:
Er, I'm about 80% sure that Xanta is female. (I like the "Ofal" appellation, but since she's been Xanta for so long on the H'pathy forums and it seems to be the one relative constant in a well-stuffed sock drawer, I'm inclined to stick with it.)

Rolfe.

Hmm... then why all the freaky Freudian weirdness above? Should I have added "homophobia" and "anti-lesbian" to my above post? Or should I just stop trying to understand why sock-of-the-day thinks what he/she/it said was insulting?
 
delphi_ote said:
Hmm... then why all the freaky Freudian weirdness above? Should I have added "homophobia" and "anti-lesbian" to my above post? Or should I just stop trying to understand why sock-of-the-day thinks what he/she/it said was insulting?
I don't know. On one of her previous sock incarnations here she fastened on to some joking posts that Suezoled was making, professing undying love for me. Now this was a fairly longrunning joke, both Suez and I knew exactly where we were, and were each aware that the other was female. However Xanta the Ofal Oaf suddenly realised that I was female and started screaming at Suez for being some sort of a pervert. I think. Something like that. I think it was the original Olaf sock, but I can't be bothered doing a search.

Rolfe.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom