ACORN filmmaker arrested

Attacking disabled persons is a well known tactic used by Lefty and his fellow truthers.

Cease and desist. I am not a twoofer, and insisting that I am is absurd beyond reason. I am not accepting the word of a total jerk just because he attacks people I do not like, the way that you have accepted and fawned on the pimp. Try to think critically even of your own heroes. Some of them are far less than heroic.
 
Seriously, with detractors like this Salon.com article, O'Keefe doesn't need me to defend him. Lurker, you should be ashamed of introducing such a thing to a skeptical forum.

Um, I didn't introduce it, I commented on it and even expressed some skepticism of the article by pointing out a lot of guilt by association taking place in it. I also even expressed an early notion of dismissing the Planned Parenthood prank as not being motivated by racism.
 
I believe he meant "deaf", not "deft". Lefty was attacking Limbaugh for having suffered hearing loss as a result of an auto-immune disorder. Attacking disabled persons is a well known tactic used by Lefty and his fellow truthers.

Thank you for correcting my typo. But surely describing Limbaugh as deaf (and fat, too) is merely descriptive. The "eunuch" remark is untrue as we have no evidence Limbaugh has been castrated, either chemically or surgically.

And aren't you indulging in some Limbaugh-like slander yourself by calling Lefty a truther, a statement you know to be untrue, and comparing him to a truther who allegedly assaulted a young girl in a wheelchair?
 
Auto-immune disorder my wrinkly old kundingi.
The lard blob gets no sympathy from me for self-inflicted ills,

*AHEM*

Limbaugh's hearing loss occurred in the course of three months. The House Ear Clinic and Institute in Los Angeles diagnosed him with autoimmune inner-ear disease (AIED). It usually is treated with a combination of medications (the steroid prednisone and the anti-inflammatory etanercept) in an effort to save residual hearing.


The website of the House Ear Institute corroborates the story:

House Ear Institute has received a $500,000 gift from Rush Limbaugh in memory of Antonio De la Cruz, M.D. The gift will be used to help the House Ear Institute continue its mission of advancing hearing science through research and education to improve quality of life.

Mr. Limbaugh had known Dr. De la Cruz since 2001 when Limbaugh became his patient after experiencing sudden hearing loss. Dr. De la Cruz, along with another House Clinic physician, diagnosed Limbaugh with auto-immune inner ear disease (AIED).


You truthers never get anything right.
 
And aren't you indulging in some Limbaugh-like slander yourself by calling Lefty a truther, a statement you know to be untrue, and comparing him to a truther who allegedly assaulted a young girl in a wheelchair?

I specified previously the sub-species of truther that Lefty falls under:

Truthers come in several "flavours". 9/11 truthers, Obama birth truthers (commonly shortened to "birthers"), Trig Palin truthers (once a large portion of the liberal blogosphere, now consists almost solely of Andrew Sullivan) and now, Green Polo Shirt truthers.

If you're going to act like a truther, expect to be called on it.... truther


Cease and desist.

No.

(see above)

I am not a twoofer, and insisting that I am is absurd beyond reason.

A person who sees grandiose conspiracies behind mundane everyday occurrences and brags about carrying loaded weapons to political rallies is pretty much exactly what a truther is.
 
Wow. That Salon article seems to be long on conclusions about how evil that conference was, and how evil the attendees and organizers are, and short on actual evidence.

What was the conference actually about? Salon doesn't tell you. What was actually discussed? Salon doesn't tell you. What was O'Keefe actually doing there? Salon has some hearsay, but that's about it. Did Salon send a reporter? No. Did Salon corroborate anything? No. Did Salon instead pack the article with namecalling of epic proportions? Why yes, yes they did.

For all the actual, factual reporting in that Salon article, O'Keefe might just as likely been at a run-of-the-mill Republican party fundraiser (which, no doubt, some opinion columnist at Salon would be happy to tell us is an ultra right-wing neo-Nazi organization).

According to Max Blumenthal:

[A]n activist organization that monitors hate groups has produced a photo of O’Keefe at a 2006 conference on “Race and Conservatism” that featured leading white nationalists. The photo, first published Jan. 30 on the Web site of the anti-racism group One People’s Project, shows O’Keefe at the gathering, which was so controversial even the ultra-right Leadership Institute, which employed O’Keefe at the time, withdrew its backing.

O'Keefe was one of the organizers of the event.

O’Keefe and [Marcus] Epstein planned an event in August 2006 that would wed their extreme views on race with their ambitions. Epstein invited white nationalist Jared Taylor and homophobic white-grievance peddler John Derbyshire of the National Review to speak at the Leadership Institute’s Northern Virginia headquarters, at a mock symposium called “Race and Conservatism.”

According to a post on the white supremacist Web site Stormfront, Taylor and Derbyshire debate “the role of race in policy decisions and the racial future of the Republican party.”

The main speaker was a white supremacist.

The event’s headline speaker, Jared Taylor, is the publisher of one of the white supremacist movement’s foremost journals, American Renaissance, which seeks to apply an academic gloss to the racialist screeds contained on its pages. According to a report on the conference published in Taylor’s magazine, Taylor argued that a taboo against discussing the alleged criminal behavior and lower intelligence of blacks and Latinos twisted political discourse, and he advocated a strong white nationalism to counter it. Derbyshire denounced “this whole rickety apparatus of affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, corporate shakedowns, profiling protests and ’speech codes.’” But the National Review editor expressed doubt that a sufficiently large white nationalist movement could be mustered to do much about it.

The photograph of O'Keefe at the event was taken by a photographer who goes by the name Isis.

Photo by Isis of the literature table Resistance O'Keefe was sitting at featuring Taylor's publication American:

http://ladylibertyslamp.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/imgp1649.jpg

Blumenthal:

“I saw O’Keefe seated at the literature table,” Isis told me. “He was there and he was supporting the event."

Isis observed that the audience treated Kevin Martin, a black conservative speaker added at the last moment to provide cover for Taylor and Derbyshire, with palpable hostility. “So many of the people in that event were like [racial separatist] Michael Hart; they were the Jared Taylor crowd. And when Kevin Martin was trying to speak you could sense the hostility. Besides, how you are going to have a fair debate with two white supremacists and one black conservative who didn’t even know what he was getting into?”

Isis said she had a long conversation with Martin after the event. “He was not happy at all. He said Epstein told him to dress down and dress casual. And the other two speakers were in suits, looking like two professional white guys and poor Kevin, he was totally set up. Jared Taylor spent the whole time talking about statistics about racial differences and how blacks were less intelligent. He said it in front of Kevin,who was freaked out.”
 
Last edited:
According to Max Blumenthal:



O'Keefe was one of the organizers of the event.



The main speaker was a white supremacist.



The photograph of O'Keefe at the event was taken by a photographer who goes by the name Isis.

Photo by Isis of the literature table featuring Taylor's publication American Resistance O'Keefe was sitting at.

http://ladylibertyslamp.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/imgp1649.jpg

Blumenthal:

See post 293. Congratulations on just repeating Blumenthal's lies that had already been debunked earlier in the thread.
 
According to Max Blumenthal:
O’Keefe and [Marcus] Epstein planned an event in August 2006 that would wed their extreme views on race with their ambitions. Epstein invited white nationalist Jared Taylor and homophobic white-grievance peddler John Derbyshire of the National Review to speak at the Leadership Institute’s Northern Virginia headquarters, at a mock symposium called “Race and Conservatism.”

White supremacists are now responding to requests from guys named "Epstein"?
 
See post 293. Congratulations on just repeating Blumenthal's lies that had already been debunked earlier in the thread.

The "debunking" merely consisted of calling O'Keefe who said Blumenthan and Salon were lying.

So we spoke with James O’Keefe today. This is what he tells us:

1. He was not “manning a table” at the event
2. He was not involved with the organization or operations of the event.
3. He attended the event with many of his Leadership Institute co-workers since it was right across the street from their building in Arlington, Va., and it was organized by other LI associates.
4. The organizer who is being called a “White Supremacist” is half Jewish and half Korean.
5. One of the panelist was an African-American named Kevin Martin.
6. The event was forced to move to a Georgetown University building in Arlington, not at a cross-burning.

Butter wouldn't melt in this kid's mouth.
 
The "debunking" merely consisted of calling O'Keefe who said Blumenthan and Salon were lying.

...AND calling the "journalist" who "broke" the story to get his sources, AND following up on the sources who deny saying what the journalist claims they said.
In other words, actual journalism. Something Blumenthal didn't do.
So, again, Max Blumenthal is wrong, and his article is full of lies.

Butter wouldn't melt in this kid's mouth.

So I assume that you can establish, definitively, that at least ONE of those six statements are inaccurate?
No? How unsurprising.
 
Last edited:
The "debunking" merely consisted of calling O'Keefe who said Blumenthan and Salon were lying.

Your "rebunking" appears to consist entirely of taking Blumenthals side and insisting it's O'Keefe who is lying.

Kudos, however for refraining from using the words "maggot", "pimp", "slut" or "poopy-headed neener-brain".
 
White supremacists are now responding to requests from guys named "Epstein"?


Marcus Epstein is of Jewish-Korean descent. He has a history of a racially motivated assault on an African-American woman in Washington, DC.

marcus-epstein-racist-karate-chop.jpg
 
Last edited:
Marcus Epstein is of Jewish-Korean descent. He has a history of racially motivated assaults on African-Americans.

[qimg]http://www.forstudentpower.org/images/marcus-epstein-racist-karate-chop.jpg[/qimg]

And for some reason, the prosecution decided not to pursue the charges. I'd like to hear more about the case before passing any judgement.

I don't particularly like Epstein, I think he's a moron. That doesn't necessary make him a person who uses violence against black people.
 
Your "rebunking" appears to consist entirely of taking Blumenthals side and insisting it's O'Keefe who is lying.

Given that it is a known fact that O'Keefe lies professionally, and that his fellow organizer is a sociopath, this is not an absurd assumption.
 
And for some reason, the prosecution decided not to pursue the charges. I'd like to hear more about the case before passing any judgement.

Start with Walter Ego's link. The prosecutor dropped charges conditionally, requiring that he see the shrink. Just the kind of "useful idiot" the Organization loves.

He's nuts.
 
Last edited:
Your "rebunking" appears to consist entirely of taking Blumenthals side and insisting it's O'Keefe who is lying.

Blumenthal spoke to several sources whom he quoted. The "debunking" consisted of calling O'Keefe who said everybody but him was lying. Presumably everyone Blumenthal spoke to is lying, too, according to O'Keefe.

I never said O'Keefe's was lying, but his MO as an alleged "journalist" consisting of telling people he's something he's not (a pimp, a telephone repairman, whatever.) In other words, lying.

And I have never referred to O'Keefe as a "maggot" or "pimp," etc. You're slipping into Rush Limbaugh territory by insinuating that I have.
 
Blumenthal spoke to several sources whom he quoted.

No, he didn't. Blumenthal quoted Jenkins only.
And Jenkins apparently got his information from one man, who when contacted insists that O'Keefe was not an organizer and did not man a literature table at the event.
But God forbid we allow actual facts to get in the way of your repeating Blumenthal's lies.
 

Back
Top Bottom