Ethan Thane Athen
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
- Messages
- 3,033
I've seen your explanations of this post, but I chose to respond to it anyway. You spend a lot of time beating down people who who have crazy notions in the fields in which you claim to have expertise. In this thread we have a picture of an aborted animal. The species has a head, two ears, two eyes, a nose with two nostrils, and a mouth. So do humans and an arkload of other species on the planet. The photo shows a malformed head while everything else looks pretty much like it belongs. That's meaningless on its face, pardon the pun.
We have the known issue of pareidolia coupled with the fact that humans have evolved to be especially good at recognizing faces. Of course we're going to see some meaning where none belongs.
Then you have experts in the field (pardon this second pun) saying that what is shown is not at all unusual.
As someone with medical experience I would expect you to take the two seconds to find out that sheep have 54 chromosomes and already know that humans have 46. I'm no expert in the field, but I'm thinking that presents a wee bit of a problem.
Yet despite all this, you felt the evidence was strong enough to say "maybe it is worth looking at the DNA in this case." I find that simply amazing considering how you deal with anti-vaxxers trying to find meaning in somebody falling ill a week after a flu shot. And considering the reputation you try to build for yourself as a skeptic and medical expert, it's even more disheartening.
Well said indeed (see also the thread on smacking children).